> if less information was presented on the main page (and I do understand
> that this is a work in progress) with the various sections linked off
> that page; then I would be very happy with it.
>
I will yank off some content tomorrow and present a gleaned version - I'll
steal the perl coding pr
On 02-Jan-2002 Alexandra Walford wrote:
> Originally, this message was to mention this: in this new version, if
> restart is chosen from the menu and windows are in multiple desktops and
> iconified, after the restart, all windows are now on the first desktop
> and uniconified. Has anyone else ex
I'm going to cast my vote for at the moment:
http://furt.com/blackbox/index.html
--
However, I do like the menu-less design of the site @
http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb/index.html
if less information was presented on the main page (and I do understand
that this is a work in progress) wi
Originally, this message was to mention this: in this new version, if
restart is chosen from the menu and windows are in multiple desktops and
iconified, after the restart, all windows are now on the first desktop
and uniconified. Has anyone else experienced this? I'd very much like
for new vers
> Personally I much prefer being able to immediately see which
> apps/windows I have iconized on the toolbar and to open them again
> from the toolbar then to have to pop up the "workspaces menu" every
> time just to see what I have iconized and to open them from there.
Try doing this. Open up t
On 02-Jan-2002 xOr wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:59:30PM -0500, Rajat Arya wrote:
>> in the theme of simplicity - here's a one page stab at the blackbox site.
>>
>> i'm a big fan of one page sites, easy to maintain.
>> static html - nothing cleaner.
>>
>> http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya
On Thu, Dec 27, 2001 at 09:59:30PM -0500, Rajat Arya wrote:
> in the theme of simplicity - here's a one page stab at the blackbox site.
>
> i'm a big fan of one page sites, easy to maintain.
> static html - nothing cleaner.
>
> http://speed.seas.upenn.edu/~rarya/bb/index.html
>
> -Raj.
So far,
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 07:35:41PM +0100, M.G. Houtman wrote:
> On Wednesday 02 January 2002 18:56, you wrote:
> > I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
> > far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible? here's what I'm
> > thinking:
> >
> > you have mul
On Wednesday 02 January 2002 18:56, you wrote:
> I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
> far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible? here's what I'm
> thinking:
>
> you have multiple overlapping xterms. if you just want to type in one,
> that's being
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 11:56, Lev Lvovsky wrote:
> you have multiple overlapping xterms. if you just want to type in one,
> that's being partially covered by another, you just move your mouse over
> to it...if however, you want to raise it, instead of clicking on the
> border, you just click anywh
I know that the option to enable both of them contradicts one another (as
far as I can tell), but nevertheless, is it possible? here's what I'm
thinking:
you have multiple overlapping xterms. if you just want to type in one,
that's being partially covered by another, you just move your mouse ov
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, xOr wrote:
> I'm not sure if you're aware or not but it seems the iconbar that
> people are requesting does not actually display "icons", but rather
> "iconified windows". Its basically adding buttons to the toolbar as
> windows are iconified, and removing them as they're unic
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 10:14:01AM -0600, xOr wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:01:56AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > On 02-Jan-2002 Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > > Personally I much prefer being able to immediately see which apps/windows
> > > I have iconized on the toolbar and to ope
>
> I'm not sure if you're aware or not but it seems the iconbar that
> people are requesting does not actually display "icons", but rather
> "iconified windows". Its basically adding buttons to the toolbar as
> windows are iconified, and removing them as they're uniconified, and
> then changing
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 08:01:56AM -0800, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 02-Jan-2002 Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have been using bb-0.61 on my laptop now for some time.
> > I have tried it with and without the 'blackbox-taskbar-patches'
> > of Ignacio Thayer.
> >
> > Personal
On 02-Jan-2002 Alexander Volovics wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I have been using bb-0.61 on my laptop now for some time.
> I have tried it with and without the 'blackbox-taskbar-patches'
> of Ignacio Thayer.
>
> Personally I much prefer being able to immediately see which apps/windows
> I have iconized o
On 02-Jan-2002 Alexander Volovics wrote:
> Hello,
>
> There are of course other non-GUI ways to get info about battery
> load when using a laptop.
>
> But is is nice to have a icon and or toolbar graphical display.
> So I tried to compile bbapm-0.0.1 (on RH 7.2 using gcc-2.96-98).
>
> Make giv
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:55:42PM +1030, John Kennison wrote:
>
> > P.S - I personally like the using the workspaces menu, it allows me to
> > minimise something and then open it up in a completely different
> > workspace & keeps my taskbar clean.
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 11:55:42PM +1030, John Kennison wrote:
> P.S - I personally like the using the workspaces menu, it allows me to
> minimise something and then open it up in a completely different
> workspace & keeps my taskbar clean.
Then what do you need a taskbar for anyway? It is actu
While I can make any promises about anything in the very near future. I
plan to take a look at bbapm and seeing if anything can be done to make it
useful once again.
--
Regards,
John Kennison
Bachelor of Business (Management Information Systems)
On Wed, 2 Jan 2002, Alexander Volovics wrote:
>
On Wed, Jan 02, 2002 at 06:48:00AM -0600, Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 06:42, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> > There are of course other non-GUI ways to get info about battery
> > load when using a laptop.
> >
> > But is is nice to have a icon and or toolbar graphical display.
I agree that waiting for patches to catch up, especially those
that are not constantly maintained is a pain in the ass. Especially for
those of us that do not have the technical knowledge or time to fix it.
However, I think what seperates blackbox from the crowds is its
VERY minimalist nature. I
On Wed, 2002-01-02 at 06:42, Alexander Volovics wrote:
> There are of course other non-GUI ways to get info about battery
> load when using a laptop.
>
> But is is nice to have a icon and or toolbar graphical display.
> So I tried to compile bbapm-0.0.1 (on RH 7.2 using gcc-2.96-98).
>
> Make g
Hello,
There are of course other non-GUI ways to get info about battery
load when using a laptop.
But is is nice to have a icon and or toolbar graphical display.
So I tried to compile bbapm-0.0.1 (on RH 7.2 using gcc-2.96-98).
Make gives the following "errors":
"/usr/local/bbapm001/share/bbto
Hello,
I have been using bb-0.61 on my laptop now for some time.
I have tried it with and without the 'blackbox-taskbar-patches'
of Ignacio Thayer.
Personally I much prefer being able to immediately see which apps/windows
I have iconized on the toolbar and to open them again from the toolbar
the
25 matches
Mail list logo
