>Am I the only one having problems with this because of a bunch of
>endlines stuck in places where they shouldn't be? Could you possibly
>send this as an attachment instead?
Sure thing. Here you go.
-Roy
bbkeys_patch.txt
Description: Binary data
Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
to speak up!
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your
> chance to speak up!
In most cases, I've simply left the slit in it's default bottom center
location. I've never really bothered mo
On 16-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry"
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your
>> chance to speak up!
>
> In most cases, I've simply left the slit in it's default bot
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT) "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry"
> > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your
> >> chance to speak up!
> >
>
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:26:26 -0700 (PDT) "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 16-Jul-2002 Jamin W. Collins wrote:
> > In most cases, I've simply left the slit in it's default bottom center
> > location. I've never really bothered moving it to a new location.
>
> you mean Bottom
On Tue, Jul16,02 10:18, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
> to speak up!
Well, it would be a useful option if the toolbar could be disabled, or if
multiple slits were allowed.
*shrug* I don't currently use it though... and
On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
"Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
> to speak up!
>
I don't use it now but I have in the past. Why do you want to remove it?
I still think the toolbar and slit
On 16-Jul-2002 Es Bee Ex wrote:
> On Tue, 16 Jul 2002 10:18:47 -0700 (PDT)
> "Sean 'Shaleh' Perry" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your
>> chance
>> to speak up!
>>
>
> I don't use it now but I have in the past. Why do you want t
It's OK with me if you remove it. (Shaleh, didn't you just know I'd agree
with a feature removal .)
My daughter says "oh, you can move it around?" I don't think she
cares either.
Best,
--Brigham Young
--- Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Does anyone actually use either option an
> Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
> to speak up!
Yes. I'd be unhappy to see this go away as I make daily use of it.
Cheers,
Kit
--
'Dreams aren't dangerous, or thrilling, until we think of them as real
possibilities.' -Jonathon Carroll, _S
I made the mistake of not reading the rest of the thread. I think I
confused the slit and the toolbar as well. I have in the past put the slit
in the top center and liked having it there, but I don't do that now and I
guess I wouldn't miss it so much as I suggest below.
Kit
On Tue, 16 Jul 20
Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
>to speak up!
>
>
>
>
I never use those slit positions and suspect I never will.
On Tue, Jul16,02 21:47, Øyvind Stegard wrote:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> >Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
> >to speak up!
> >
> I never use those slit positions and suspect I never will.
The thing is... I must protest the removal of those posit
El Tue, 16 Jul 2002 21:47:01 +0200
Øyvind Stegard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> escribió:
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
> >Does anyone actually use either option and would miss it? Now is your chance
> >to speak up!
> >
> >
> >
> >
> I never use those slit positions and suspect I never will.
Neither
I received enough feedback and useful rationale to leave these options in.
Code is now fixed to properly support them as well (-:
Thanks all.
Monday, July 15, 2002, 12:32:59 PM, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15-Jul-2002 Ciprian Popovici wrote:
>> provided any arguments. In certain cases (like using Gimp) I still say they
>> would be useful. They provide a way to save desktop space. Well?
> As for why. Mostly aeth
>
> The thing is... I must protest the removal of those positions. If we
> eventually have the ability to disable the toolbar (and/or the slit, but
> that's beside the point i'm trying to make) then the slit would be a very
> good place to stick an application launcher, and other replacement tool
Kolbe Kegel declaimed:
> the scroll lock one sounds good... i don't even know what the hell
> scroll lock is supposed to do.
>
> scroll lock on = no black box key bindings would be pretty novel
>
> Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
>
Here's another vote for scroll lock, which I have never used in Lin
19 matches
Mail list logo
