> The compiler doesn't know which "shape" you are referring to. The struct
> definition is in the style of C programming. In C++ when you define a
> struct, the name of the struct is automatically type qualified. So you now
> have a private type called "shape".
>
Actually that's not really cor
On Tuesday 12 March 2002 14:50, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> On 12-Mar-2002 Eric Christian Carlsen wrote:
> > I tried to compile blackbox 0.62.1 for hpux and I had some problems. The
> > configure script went fine (we have gcc and c++) but right when it
> > started to compile it gave the following
On Friday 22 February 2002 12:45, Andy Kopciuch wrote:
> > Someone with experience with the bbtools code should be able to write
> > this in 2 or 3 days. A newbie to the code but not to coding should be
> > able to knock it out in a week or so.
> >
> > Either bbpa
>
> Someone with experience with the bbtools code should be able to write this
> in 2 or 3 days. A newbie to the code but not to coding should be able to
> knock it out in a week or so.
>
> Either bbpager or bbkeys has most of this written, so you could also start
> by field stripping one of thes
>
> note it is a warning, not an error. What is actually happening is the
> bblaunch code is rather sloppy. The fix is easy.
>
> The reason it is complaining is because it tries to read its own window
> which does not have all of the hints set.
>
> The message is spurious anyways. What is actua
Hi,
With the recent session management/bblaunch discussion, I did some playing
around.
I can use bblaunch for say aterm in workspace 4
bblaunch -w 4 aterm
That works fine, but when I use a KDE application, it fails
bblaunch -w 4 konsole
I get this error:
"Warning: XGetCommand can't allocate
On Wednesday 06 February 2002 15:39, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> There has been some concerned raised and I want to discuss this on its own
> thread so no one misses it.
>
> In the upcoming weeks there is going to be a major change in the blackbox
> internals. Part of this is to remove the home
On Monday 10 December 2001 17:42, Mark Weinem wrote:
> Hi Sean!
>
> On Sun, 09 Dec 2001, Sean 'Shaleh' Perry wrote:
> > Welcome to the blackbox world where a simple feature request leads to
> > 8 different ways to skin the proverbial cat that do not involve
> > changing blackbox.
>
> Will you real
On Saturday 08 December 2001 20:21, you wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 07:18:10PM -0700, Andy Kopciuch wrote:
> > On Saturday 08 December 2001 19:04, you wrote:
> > > On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 06:00:56PM -0500, Paul Kincaid wrote:
> > > > I'm looking for a way
On Saturday 08 December 2001 19:04, you wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 08, 2001 at 06:00:56PM -0500, Paul Kincaid wrote:
> > I'm looking for a way that if you select "Exit" from the Blackbox Menu
> > that you are prompted to exit rather than it just killing everything and
> > kicking me out to the console.
> It's based on mozilla, and as such, I've found that Galeon (also based on
> mozilla) was a dog. When I load Konq... I'm happy... it's responsive, and
> there's definately no lame interface choices... so why change? Konq is good
> (well, i'll s/good/great/g; just as SOON as I can get flash/javasc
> >
> > 1. Is there a better way than putting the call to xpmroot in my
> > xinitrc file to load up a background image? Does Blackbox have somewhere
> > that you can list commands to automatically run on initialization. I
> > want to also put bbkeys in there as well.
> >
try bsetbg. It is a s
On Sunday 28 October 2001 15:56, Hurgh wrote:
> Just a quetsion about the background in blackbox.
>
> I know that you use the Esetroot command to change the background, the
> question that i have though is how do u make it stay like that.
>
> If i use Esetroot, and then i restart blackbox or somet
On Sunday 16 September 2001 22:44, Jason Kasper wrote:
> Just so this problem can be correctly interpreted as being fixed, we found
> the problem and have corrected it in the CVS version. If anybody else
> is running into these kind of errors, please checkout the CVS version
> and see if that fix
> * The File Manager would be XML/XSLT based, allowing users to 'walk the
> tree' AND because of the XSLT be completely skinable (I have no idea how
> gtk+ works, this could be another option). '/' would be the over seeing
> class with everything below it being a child (see below for a short, thin
On Friday 17 August 2001 12:22, Will Bohan wrote:
> OK, so I did a fresh install of the entire OS last
> night to see if I could get Kmail working with
> blackbox...
>
> after the OS install I got the latest versions of
> blackbox and bbkeys and set up everything, started X
> and tried Kmail, perf
O.K. I went on a bit of a tangent. I'll stop posting code now.
feh.
> - the code should probably store strlen(buf) rather than
> always recomputing it, especially if you allow the chance
> of 16K lines
> - there's a bit of excessive malloc'ing going on... there's
> no need to re-malloc buf, at least.
>
> For simplicity's sake, I'd probably just put
>
> Here's my 'quick' way of implementing the ability to break lines...
>
I modified your code slightly. My rendition is attached for interested
parties.
> There are a few problems with this code snippet: 1) a large amount of code
> repetition,
Repetiton is not always a no-no. It depends o
I recently downloaded a bunch of themes. (hooray for themes.org back in
action).
Anyways:
There are several different ways the themes are setup. For example some in
"Styles" some in "styles" some using *.jpg, some using *.png. and different
rootCommand entries for setting the background
On Tuesday 10 July 2001 15:28, Bartek Kostrzewa wrote:
> Ok, after some trying I found out the really correct method, taken from a
> mail to this list.
>
> .
> .
>
> exec bbkeys -i &
> exec blackbox
>
> .
> .
>
> Only this will do the trick perfectly on my machine, I don't know why, but
> if I st
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 20:00, Jamin Collins wrote:
> Considering the flame war that started (and may still be raging) this might
> not be a wise question, but here we go.
>
> Does anyone know of a good quality but very slim IDE for any of the
> following: C,C++, or Java?
>
> I'm asking here be
I have been in the forefront of the current email discussion about blackbox.
Along with quite a few others.
Bill Beal brought up a good point to which I was pondering myself:
No bb developers ( Brad Hughes ... ) have had anything to say on the matter.
And most likely for good reason, they don'
> Absolutely!
>
> Jamin W. Collins
>
> PS. With our views being so similiar, people may start to think one of us
> actually controls both accounts on the mailing list.
heh
> Those who like it light want all the extras to be kept outside of BB, in
> order to keep the binary small. On the other hand, for those who like
> the extras, having separate applications running at the same time is not
> very efficient: there is the X-middleman problem, and I guess the total
>
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 09:35, Eric Hanson wrote:
> Andy Kopciuch wrote:
> > 3. Blackbox isn't for a beginner-average user. If it was, then why
> > don't you see the kids from Dawson's Creek using it to write their love
> > poetry?
>
> Do you
On Wednesday 13 June 2001 03:20, you wrote:
> Hi.
>
> On Tue, Jun 12, 2001 at 12:21:11PM -0600, Andy Kopciuch wrote:
> > As for the newbies ease of use. IMO blackbox is very specialized WM, and
> > not for a linux newbie. They would sit around on their hands for 2 hours
> I'm not so sure that it's just for 'veteran' users either. I've seen people
> use BB as their first WM and stay with it because they liked it. (I used to
> have an AS setup that really was for veterans only: different menu patterns
> and never once did anything but a program window or a graphic
>
> Why does everyone seem to think that Lunix is the only OS that BB runs on?
> I mean, for 's sake, the BB code has provisions to run
> on OS/2 EMX! Not to mention getting it to work on Sun's "ANSI-Compatible"
> systems.
>
How many people do you know who run a Sun sytem as their home computer?
> now my other problem... it's not window manager specific afaik... but
> _very_ annoying.. maybe somebody can help ntl... i use a shell which is
> called 'powershell' which opens many shells in one window, with a tab to
> switch through the different shells... this worked fine until i switched to
On Tuesday 12 June 2001 09:25, you wrote:
> there seems to be alot of differing opinions wrt integrating or packaging
> all the bbtools with blackbox. i'd have to say that, although it can be
> tedious to dl/build a bunch of apps rather than just one, i'm in favor of
> keeping things as they are
31 matches
Mail list logo
