Nathan's email reminded me that there's also a dubious statement on the current
ffmpeg page. The page references using qt-faststart to 'flatten' files by
moving the index to the front of the file.
Indeed, qt-faststart does move the moov atom (which contains metadata about the
video) to the fron
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:50:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> My only concern is to keep something like the /etc directory at a
>> reasonable number of entries. Right now I have 90. Compare that to
>> ubuntu that has 217 or RHEL with 199. I think of the /etc directory as
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 17:25:30 -0800
Nathan Coulson wrote:
> Just noticed it references yasm, but does not point to the BLFS page
>
My fault. Yasm wasn't in the book when I did the ffmpeg page. I'll fix
it now. Thanks for the heads up.
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-de
Just noticed it references yasm, but does not point to the BLFS page
--
Nathan Coulson (conathan)
--
Location: British Columbia, Canada
Timezone: PST (-8)
Webpage: http://www.nathancoulson.com
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:50:31PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> My only concern is to keep something like the /etc directory at a
> reasonable number of entries. Right now I have 90. Compare that to
> ubuntu that has 217 or RHEL with 199. I think of the /etc directory as
> a place where I m
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On my partial-gnome installation (apart from the gnome2 packages
> previously mentioned, I built gcalctool, gucharmap,
> epiphany{,-extensions}, gstreamer/plugins, totem, yelp from 3.2 -
> plus their many required dependencies) I have the following
> directories in /etc/gnome:
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:46:14PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
> > I don't see Gnome as a package. GConf is a package, libgnome is a package,
> > Gnome is a Suite of packages.
>
> That's true AFAICT. In fact, I was looking at the Gnome sources
> yesterday at http://ftp.
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 10:33:44PM +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I was going to defer asking this (Andy only put 9.0 in the book
> today,
Oh Calamity! Wrong list - sorry for the noise.
--
das eine Mal als Tragödie, das andere Mal als Farce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-d
I was going to defer asking this (Andy only put 9.0 in the book
today, and [ for those who don't follow -dev ] at the moment only
the ftp works - until mozilla copy the tarball to the http link.
Plus, I'm not expecting to be able to use my machine much, if at
all, tomorrow (electricity meter chang
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 02:58:55PM -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
> > Just looking at my gnome 2.30.2 installation. You can also argue that
> > having /etc/gnome is not compliant because it has dbus in two locations
> > /etc/gnome/2.30.2/dbus-1 and /etc/dbus-1.
>
> Are they
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 14:58:55 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> In /etc/dbus-1 I have:
>
>session.conf session.d system.conf system.d
>
> where the two directories are empty.
Incidentally, even though /etc/dbus-1/session.d is empty, dbus won't
work if it doesn't exist.
Andy
--
http://linuxfro
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> Just looking at my gnome 2.30.2 installation. You can also argue that
> having /etc/gnome is not compliant because it has dbus in two locations
> /etc/gnome/2.30.2/dbus-1 and /etc/dbus-1.
Are they the same? In /etc/dbus-1 I have:
session.conf session.d system.conf
On 21/12/11 07:22, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>> Only issue is the FHS says that if possible *always* keep
>> same-package sysconf data in a subdirectory of /etc. Such
>> as /etc/gnome.
> I don't see Gnome as a package. GConf is a package, libgnome is a package,
> Gnome is a Suite of packages.
> J
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 21/12/11 05:36, Randy McMurchy wrote:
>> On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Andrew Benton wrote:
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
> just
On 21/12/11 05:36, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
>>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>>
My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
just to name a few)
>>>
>>> +1 for t
On 12/20/2011 3:10 AM, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> As in my version of the book, (Option 5) I opted to have a
> $GNOME_SYSCONFDIR variable rather than a semi hard coded path. That way,
> the user can decide what path they choose to use, just like with
> $GNOME_PREFIX.
I also think this is good. All t
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:59:31 -0600
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>> Doesn't --sysconfdir=/etc imply /etc/gnome? I thought the problem was
>> moving it away from /usr/etc/gnome.
>
> It's /etc/gconf
That's fine.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 12:59:31 -0600
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Doesn't --sysconfdir=/etc imply /etc/gnome? I thought the problem was
> moving it away from /usr/etc/gnome.
It's /etc/gconf
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Randy McMurchy wrote:
> On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
>>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>>
My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
just to name a few)
>>> +1 for this. I install my gconf
On 12/20/2011 11:24 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>
>>> My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
>>> just to name a few)
>>
>> +1 for this. I install my gconf stuff --sysconfdir=/etc
>
>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:12:38PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:44:25 +
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> Actually, I should rephrase the question - *how* do you get the
>>> release tarball ?
>> Sorry, I used the ftp link. I didn't realise the http link
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 05:12:38PM +, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:44:25 +
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> >
> > Actually, I should rephrase the question - *how* do you get the
> > release tarball ?
>
> Sorry, I used the ftp link. I didn't realise the http link was a 404.
> Sh
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>
>> My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
>> just to name a few)
>
> +1 for this. I install my gconf stuff --sysconfdir=/etc
I agree.
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 15:44:25 +
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Andy, is the release tarball available yet ? on lynx I get a 404,
> and if I go to the 9.0 directory I get:
>
>Thanks for your interest in Firefox 9
>
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 07:14:20AM -0700, a...@linuxfromscratch.org wrote:
> Author: andy
> Date: 2011-12-20 07:14:09 -0700 (Tue, 20 Dec 2011)
> New Revision: 9125
>
> Modified:
>trunk/BOOK/general.ent
>trunk/BOOK/introduction/welcome/changelog.xml
>trunk/BOOK/x/lib/xulrunner.xml
>
On Tue, 20 Dec 2011 20:10:48 +1100
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> My preference is option 4) /etc (Something that Fedora and Ubuntu uses,
> just to name a few)
+1 for this. I install my gconf stuff --sysconfdir=/etc
Andy
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxf
On 20/12/11 11:46, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm starting to gather my data to update the gnome2 packages that I
.
>
> So, my own preference is for /etc/gnome, or failing that to move
> the legacy packages I mentioned the other day to using /etc/gnome2
> or -2 or -2.32. But what do other people,
27 matches
Mail list logo
