Re: [blfs-dev] dovecot

2013-11-11 Thread Igor Živković
On 11/12/2013 07:04 AM, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Ken Moffat wrote: >> >>We could use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dovecot, but that puts the >> libexec files file in /usr/lib/dovecot/dovecot/ or we could follow >> CBLFS and use --libexecdir=/usr/lib/dovecot/exec which puts them into >> /usr/lib/dovecot/ex

Re: [blfs-dev] dovecot

2013-11-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Ken Moffat wrote: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:51:24AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: >> For me, dovecot-2.2.7 fails during it's install - >> >> Making install in auth >> make[2]: Entering directory >> '/scratch/working/dovecot-2.2.7/src/auth' >> make[3]: Entering directory >> '/scratch/working/dovecot

Re: [blfs-dev] dovecot

2013-11-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Nov 12, 2013 at 01:51:24AM +, Ken Moffat wrote: > For me, dovecot-2.2.7 fails during it's install - > > Making install in auth > make[2]: Entering directory > '/scratch/working/dovecot-2.2.7/src/auth' > make[3]: Entering directory > '/scratch/working/dovecot-2.2.7/src/auth' > /bin/mk

[blfs-dev] dovecot

2013-11-11 Thread Ken Moffat
For me, dovecot-2.2.7 fails during it's install - Making install in auth make[2]: Entering directory '/scratch/working/dovecot-2.2.7/src/auth' make[3]: Entering directory '/scratch/working/dovecot-2.2.7/src/auth' /bin/mkdir -p '/usr/lib/dovecot' /bin/sh ../../libtool --mode=install /usr/bin/

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600 > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c. > . . > The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated. > Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600 > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c. > . . > The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated. > Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
- subject line should've been '...ldns/libevent/doxygen...' and not '...ldns/libnice/doxygen...' - i.e. nice -> event . akh -- -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600 > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c. > . . > The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated. > Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600 > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c. > . . > The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated. > Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
> Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2013 11:49:29 -0600 > From: Bruce Dubbs > To: BLFS Development List > Subject: Re: [blfs-dev] typos, patches, &c. > . . > The corrections to the svn version of the book would be appreciated. > Either patches or an email identifying the issues would be OK.

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
akhiezer wrote: > Hi, > > While reading through blfs74 book, I noticed in passing several apparent > typos, > inconsistent-casing, packages referred to as external yet are now part of > book, > and so on. > > First: are you interested in applying these corrections to the book; of > course, > you

blfs-dev@linuxfromscratch.org

2013-11-11 Thread akhiezer
Hi, While reading through blfs74 book, I noticed in passing several apparent typos, inconsistent-casing, packages referred to as external yet are now part of book, and so on. First: are you interested in applying these corrections to the book; of course, you'll want to see them first - but at