Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:51:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>> On 09/04/12 02:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
I do understand that some will be more comfortable with the tighter
permissions just on principle, but I'm trying to understand why rw
>>>
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 08:51:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> > On 09/04/12 02:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> >> I do understand that some will be more comfortable with the tighter
> >> permissions just on principle, but I'm trying to understand why rw
> >> access to /dev/d
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 09/04/12 02:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I do understand that some will be more comfortable with the tighter
>> permissions just on principle, but I'm trying to understand why rw
>> access to /dev/dri/card0 for a 'guest' user would be a problem.
> I'm not an expert hack
On 09/04/12 02:25, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>> On 08/04/12 11:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
OK, so it's udev rather than Mesa that determines the group name.
But, in all current LFS builds we *don't* have such a rule. To me,
it seems more reliab
On Sun, Apr 08, 2012 at 02:12:14AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/07/2012 05:13 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> >
> > The important stuff is the changes in xorg-config, changes in
> > clutter (apart from the link), metacity, mutter, totem are really
> > just minor rewording now that I understand the hw/s
Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> On 08/04/12 11:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> OK, so it's udev rather than Mesa that determines the group name.
>>> But, in all current LFS builds we *don't* have such a rule. To me,
>>> it seems more reliable to add users to the video group. After all,
Le 08/04/2012 03:19, Bruce Dubbs a écrit :
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:23:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> In mesa, I see three places that use card0. They are all of the form
>>> fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR);
>>>
>>> I see in rules.d/50-udev-default.rules an entry
>
On 08/04/12 11:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:23:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> In mesa, I see three places that use card0. They are all of the form
>>> fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR);
>>>
>>> I see in rules.d/50-udev-default.rules an entry
>>> S
On 04/07/2012 05:13 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> O
> Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:49:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> Which device is that? /dev/dri/card0? I'd think the kernel/udev would
>> create it at boot. I don't have an ATI graphics card to test, but I'm
>> interested. I'
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:23:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> In mesa, I see three places that use card0. They are all of the form
>> fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR);
>>
>> I see in rules.d/50-udev-default.rules an entry
>> SUBSYSTEM=="drm", GROUP="video"
>>
>> The defau
On Sat, 07 Apr 2012 22:49:38 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Note that I no longer need the chmod, the device and group appear
> > to be created in Mesa. I suppose someone could add a udev rule, but
> > then you would need to get that executed (e.g. by rebooting) before
> > a r
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 07:23:44PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> In mesa, I see three places that use card0. They are all of the form
> fd = open("/dev/dri/card0", O_RDWR);
>
> I see in rules.d/50-udev-default.rules an entry
> SUBSYSTEM=="drm", GROUP="video"
>
> The default udev permissions is
Ken Moffat wrote:
> Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:49:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>> Which device is that? /dev/dri/card0? I'd think the kernel/udev would
>> create it at boot. I don't have an ATI graphics card to test, but I'm
>> interested. I'll look at the source, but
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:27:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> It might be because it is a sect2 ?
>>>
>>> I'm not at the desktop at the moment, will try again later.
>> id and xreflabel are "common" tags and are valid for any element.
>>
>> http://ww
O
Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 04:49:18PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Which device is that? /dev/dri/card0? I'd think the kernel/udev would
> create it at boot. I don't have an ATI graphics card to test, but I'm
> interested. I'll look at the source, but I need to know what to
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:27:41PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > It might be because it is a sect2 ?
> >
> > I'm not at the desktop at the moment, will try again later.
>
> id and xreflabel are "common" tags and are valid for any element.
>
> http://www.docbook.org/tdg/e
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:29:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> Meanwhile, now that I've had to become a member of the video group
>>> to get *hardware* accelerated rendering to work (years ago, the
>>> 'chmod 0660' was enough for what was available). I t
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Ken Moffat wrote:
>>
>>> I don't particularly like the way it has decided to use 'the section
>>> called'
>> That can be controlled with xreflabel:
>>
>>
> It might be because it is a sect2 ?
>
> I'm not at t
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:29:49PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> >>
> > Meanwhile, now that I've had to become a member of the video group
> > to get *hardware* accelerated rendering to work (years ago, the
> > 'chmod 0660' was enough for what was available). I think the
> > ins
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 02:35:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > I don't particularly like the way it has decided to use 'the section
> > called'
>
> That can be controlled with xreflabel:
>
>
>
>-- Bruce
It might be because it is a sect2 ?
I'm not at the desktop
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I don't particularly like the way it has decided to use 'the section called'
That can be controlled with xreflabel:
-- Bruce
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above informati
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 12:30:34AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
>>> Ah yes, it didn't get transferred over to the single page. Will get on
>>> it in a sec.
>>>
>>> -- DJ Lucas
>> Actually, I wound up putting it on the server page. It really didn't
>> read well on the configuration pa
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 06:57:15PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> > Meanwhile, now that I've had to become a member of the video group
> > to get *hardware* accelerated rendering to work (years ago, the
> > 'chmod 0660' was enough for what
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 03:44:49PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
> Meanwhile, now that I've had to become a member of the video group
> to get *hardware* accelerated rendering to work (years ago, the
> 'chmod 0660' was enough for what was available). I think the
> instructions on membership of that gr
On Sat, Apr 07, 2012 at 12:30:34AM -0500, DJ Lucas wrote:
> >>
> > Ah yes, it didn't get transferred over to the single page. Will get on
> > it in a sec.
> >
> > -- DJ Lucas
> Actually, I wound up putting it on the server page. It really didn't
> read well on the configuration page as it is requi
On 04/06/2012 11:14 PM, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 04/06/2012 07:43 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:37:24PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>>> Apologies if I missed a previous discussion, but I noticed the
>>> x-setup.html page no longer exists (not linked).
>>> I was specifically look
On 04/06/2012 07:43 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:37:24PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
>> Apologies if I missed a previous discussion, but I noticed the
>> x-setup.html page no longer exists (not linked).
>> I was specifically looking for the following instructions:
>>
>> cat>
On Fri, Apr 06, 2012 at 02:37:24PM +1000, Wayne Blaszczyk wrote:
> Apologies if I missed a previous discussion, but I noticed the
> x-setup.html page no longer exists (not linked).
> I was specifically looking for the following instructions:
>
> cat >> /etc/sysconfig/createfiles << "EOF"
> /tmp/.I
Apologies if I missed a previous discussion, but I noticed the
x-setup.html page no longer exists (not linked).
I was specifically looking for the following instructions:
cat >> /etc/sysconfig/createfiles << "EOF"
/tmp/.ICE-unix dir 1777 root root
EOF
I gather that this is still relevant since I'
29 matches
Mail list logo
