On Mon, Jul 9, 2012 at 2:20 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>> On 07/09/2012 10:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Armin K. wrote:
>>>
I have gegl-0.2.0 installed already, and I just configured and built it
in order to run the testsuite. It failed first time because of jpeg2000
Armin K. wrote:
> On 07/09/2012 10:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> Armin K. wrote:
>>
>>> I have gegl-0.2.0 installed already, and I just configured and built it
>>> in order to run the testsuite. It failed first time because of jpeg2000
>>> loader (libjasper) error, but I disabled it and then testsui
On 07/09/2012 10:50 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Armin K. wrote:
>
>> I have gegl-0.2.0 installed already, and I just configured and built it
>> in order to run the testsuite. It failed first time because of jpeg2000
>> loader (libjasper) error, but I disabled it and then testsuite passed. I
>> use i68
Armin K. wrote:
> I have gegl-0.2.0 installed already, and I just configured and built it
> in order to run the testsuite. It failed first time because of jpeg2000
> loader (libjasper) error, but I disabled it and then testsuite passed. I
> use i686, so no, it is not i686 error.
It must be some d
On 07/09/2012 07:40 PM, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:23:44PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
>>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>>
Has anyone else seen this problem?
>>>
>>> No, I wonder if it's because I've installed gegl and then tried to run
>>> the tests?
>>>
>>>
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:23:44PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
>> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>
>>> Has anyone else seen this problem?
>>
>> No, I wonder if it's because I've installed gegl and then tried to run
>> the tests?
>>
>> Andy
>
> A good suggestion (I found several examples
On Mon, Jul 09, 2012 at 12:23:44PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
> > Has anyone else seen this problem?
>
> No, I wonder if it's because I've installed gegl and then tried to run
> the tests?
>
> Andy
A good suggestion (I found several examples like that in gnome when
I w
On Sun, 08 Jul 2012 23:11:18 +0100
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm building gegl as a dependency for gimp and ran into a test problem.
> There are 8 failures, but they are all the same. The are doing:
>
> GEGL_PATH=../operations ./img_cmp file1.png file2.png
>
> The program is seg faulting. Whe
Ken Moffat wrote:
> I'm moderately surprised that you seem to be running tests on
> everything (I thought you had taken a similar stance to myself and
> Andy for *blfs* tests, and I suspect that LFS-7.2 will turn out to
> be sufficiently different from current -svn to make any results
> meaningl
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 06:19:19PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken Moffat wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 05:11:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> >> I'm building gegl as a dependency for gimp and ran into a test problem.
> >>There are 8 failures, but they are all the same. The are doing:
> >
Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 05:11:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>> I'm building gegl as a dependency for gimp and ran into a test problem.
>>There are 8 failures, but they are all the same. The are doing:
>>
>> GEGL_PATH=../operations ./img_cmp file1.png file2.png
>>
>> The
On Sun, Jul 08, 2012 at 05:11:30PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> I'm building gegl as a dependency for gimp and ran into a test problem.
> There are 8 failures, but they are all the same. The are doing:
>
> GEGL_PATH=../operations ./img_cmp file1.png file2.png
>
> The program is seg faulting.
I'm building gegl as a dependency for gimp and ran into a test problem.
There are 8 failures, but they are all the same. The are doing:
GEGL_PATH=../operations ./img_cmp file1.png file2.png
The program is seg faulting. When I test manually, I get:
file1.png and file2.png are identical
Seg
13 matches
Mail list logo
