Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 08/20/05 21:29 CST:
* Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-21 01:50]:
I haven't forgotten about your suggestions, Miguel. I'll be doing some
research about your suggestions and putting the stuff into the book. I
was hoping others would contribute some
Miguel Bazdresch wrote these words on 08/11/05 19:36 CST:
About suggestions for other packages: oprofile is a nice alternative to
valgrind: http://oprofile.sourceforge.net/news/
We might consider adding more RCS packages, since source control is a
basic developers' tool. We might add darcs,
* Randy McMurchy [EMAIL PROTECTED] [2005-08-21 01:50]:
I haven't forgotten about your suggestions, Miguel. I'll be doing some
research about your suggestions and putting the stuff into the book. I
was hoping others would contribute some more ideas, and I'd do it all
at once.
That's good to
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
On 8/9/05, David Fix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I don't have an install.log file... Is that standard?
(Aw crap, now I'm showing that I don't know how to create this file! :P)
See the last paragraph in
Archaic wrote:
On Wed, Aug 10, 2005 at 07:25:27AM +0100, Richard A Downing wrote:
My way now is never to type the commands directly, but create a
scriptlet for each package built from a template that is essentially
Bruce's script plus some checks.
And to take automation one step further,
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 08/10/05 22:53 CST:
[snip 435 lines of stuff about building LFS]
At this point, might it be best to move this thread over to a different
list? :-)
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2 20041220] [gcc (GCC) 3.4.3]
[GNU C Library stable release version
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/09/05 11:40 CST:
I'd like to propose a new section added to Chapter 12 - Programming.
A section titled Other Programming Tools
I have the section finished and will be committing it shortly. I'm too
lazy to copy it up somewhere, so it will not be
Hi all,
I'd like to propose a new section added to Chapter 12 - Programming.
A section titled Other Programming Tools
In this section would be nothing but links to the home pages for various
other programming tools such as Strace and GDB.
Granted, most programmers would already be aware of
In this section would be nothing but links to the home pages
for various
other programming tools such as Strace and GDB.
Granted, most programmers would already be aware of these tools, but
for folks coming from other platforms, it would be an quick and easy
source to the links for these
Randy McMurchy wrote:
What say the group?
It sounds alright, but if you're only providing links and not build
instructions, do you really need an entirely new section? Wouldn't one
page suffice?
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ:
David Fix wrote these words on 08/09/05 11:45 CST:
Definitely. :) I was quite surprised to find that there was no GDB in BLFS
whatsoever... :) I mean, yeah, I can easily download, build, and install
it, but for people who may not know where to find it... Great idea. :)
Which bring me to
Jeremy Huntwork wrote these words on 08/09/05 11:46 CST:
It sounds alright, but if you're only providing links and not build
instructions, do you really need an entirely new section? Wouldn't one
page suffice?
In BLFSspeak, section = page.
--
Randy
rmlscsi: [GNU ld version 2.15.94.0.2
Randy McMurchy wrote:
In BLFSspeak, section = page.
Right. Thanks. ;)
--
JH
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Randy McMurchy wrote:
And so forth and so on as I think of (and y'all provide) more ideas
to include on this page.
'ddd' I believe is the preferred (read stable currently
well-maintained) GUI frontend for gdb. Homepage:
http://www.gnu.org/software/ddd/ Download URL:
Randy McMurchy wrote these words on 08/09/05 13:32 CST:
And so forth and so on as I think of (and y'all provide) more ideas
to include on this page.
These items will also be included:
Numeric (python numerical extension)
Boost
FFTW
GOB
GTK bindings
SWIG
Valgrind
More ideas are welcome!
--
Notice the 'cd gdb' before 'make install'. This is how my build script
is laid out, and though my memory is fuzzy about this, I 'cd gdb' so
that the readline, libiberty, etc. libraries aren't installed along
with the gdb executable.
Or am I wrong about this and it is nothing more than CMMI?
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 03:04:36PM -0400, David Fix wrote:
First off, what's CMMI? :D Secondly, I didn't do the cd gdb before I did
CMMI:
Centre for Molecular Microbiology and Infection
or maybe,
Capability Maturity Model Integration
but I'm pretty sure in this instance Randy means
Configure
On 8/9/05, David Fix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Notice the 'cd gdb' before 'make install'. This is how my build script
is laid out, and though my memory is fuzzy about this, I 'cd gdb' so
that the readline, libiberty, etc. libraries aren't installed along
with the gdb executable.
Or am I
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote:
I don't install it using configure-make-make install. I use the
following:
configure
make
make check-gdb
cd gdb
make install
Notice the 'cd gdb' before 'make install'. This is how my build script
is laid out, and though my memory is fuzzy
Ken Moffat wrote these words on 08/09/05 14:57 CST:
On Tue, 9 Aug 2005, Randy McMurchy wrote:
Or am I wrong about this and it is nothing more than CMMI?
*!$%# ! (translate that as nice catch, Randy for those with sensitive
eyes). Actually, it's libbfd, libopcodes, and libiberty. I hadn't
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 11:40:28AM -0500, Randy McMurchy wrote:
What say the group?
Groovy. BTW, just taking a quick peek at my buildscript for strace (I
can't remember how long it was that I wrote it), strace is a cmmi
package.
--
Archaic
Want control, education, and security from your
David Fix wrote these words on 08/09/05 16:45 CST:
Actually, it's libbfd, libopcodes, and libiberty. I hadn't
spotted that in my logs. Fortunately, only static and
libtool versions.
Zounds! So since I installed gdb without cd'ing into the gdb directory
before doing a make install... What
or closely review your install.log file created during the GDB
installation (you do have one, right?).
Um... Ah... Of course I do. If I hadn't deleted my gdb install directory.
:P I guess I'll just reinstall binutils, or will it actually matter?
Dave
--
Static versions of the 3 libraries mentioned above are installed by
the Binutils package. I'm not sure what all else might have been
overwritten by installing GDB the way you did. Install GDB in a
private directory for a complete list of files that are installed,
or closely review your
Tushar Teredesai wrote these words on 08/09/05 18:25 CST:
On 8/9/05, David Fix [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Though I don't have an install.log file... Is that standard?
(Aw crap, now I'm showing that I don't know how to create this file! :P)
See the last paragraph in
See the last paragraph in
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/introduction/un
packing.html.
Tush's suggestion is good, however, if all you want to do is create
a log file without thousands of lines of stuff scrolling across your
screen just redirect the output using the
David Fix wrote these words on 08/09/05 18:45 CST:
Awesome. :) Thank you both. :) I always like to see stuff as I
compile/install/whatever it, just so I can see it's still doing something.
;) Thanks again, both of you!
You're welcome!
Note that you can redirect to a file in *append*
Note that you can redirect to a file in *append* mode by using
instead of . Example:
Yeah, I'd known that stuff... :) I just thought that make install in
most standard packages made this mysterious install.log file. *blush* Ah,
sometimes my naivete (and spelling errors) shine through! ;)
28 matches
Mail list logo
