BLFS 6.1 release strategy

2005-07-24 Thread Bruce Dubbs
I have just gone through bugzilla and marked packages for BLFS 6.1. Right now there are 56 (out of 83 open) showing a target milestone of 6.1 If anyone thinks that a bug's target milestone should be upgraded to 6.1 (or delayed back to future), please discuss it here. Once we get these outstanding

Re: BLFS 6.1 release strategy

2005-07-24 Thread Randy McMurchy
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/24/05 16:38 CST: > I have just gone through bugzilla and marked packages for BLFS 6.1. > Right now there are 56 (out of 83 open) showing a target milestone of 6.1 > > If anyone thinks that a bug's target milestone should be upgraded to 6.1 > (or delayed back to

Re: BLFS 6.1 release strategy

2005-07-24 Thread David Jensen
On 07/24/05 16:42:27, Randy McMurchy wrote: In my opinion, the book is stable now, and could be released as is (just a couple of package updates first). Adding almost 50 package updates right before a *major* release is just asking for trouble. I agree, only known broken and security fixes are

Re: BLFS 6.1 release strategy

2005-07-24 Thread Tushar Teredesai
On 7/24/05, David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 07/24/05 16:42:27, Randy McMurchy wrote: > > > > In my opinion, the book is stable now, and could be released as > > is (just a couple of package updates first). Adding almost 50 > > package updates right before a *major* release is just aski