I have just gone through bugzilla and marked packages for BLFS 6.1.
Right now there are 56 (out of 83 open) showing a target milestone of 6.1
If anyone thinks that a bug's target milestone should be upgraded to 6.1
(or delayed back to future), please discuss it here.
Once we get these outstanding
Bruce Dubbs wrote these words on 07/24/05 16:38 CST:
> I have just gone through bugzilla and marked packages for BLFS 6.1.
> Right now there are 56 (out of 83 open) showing a target milestone of 6.1
>
> If anyone thinks that a bug's target milestone should be upgraded to 6.1
> (or delayed back to
On 07/24/05 16:42:27, Randy McMurchy wrote:
In my opinion, the book is stable now, and could be released as
is (just a couple of package updates first). Adding almost 50
package updates right before a *major* release is just asking
for trouble.
I agree, only known broken and security fixes are
On 7/24/05, David Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 07/24/05 16:42:27, Randy McMurchy wrote:
> >
> > In my opinion, the book is stable now, and could be released as
> > is (just a couple of package updates first). Adding almost 50
> > package updates right before a *major* release is just aski