Hi:
I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before releasing 6.1:
* http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
* http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1020
* http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1458
* http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromsc
Tushar Teredesai wrote:
> Hi:
>
> I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before releasing
> 6.1:
> * http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the
bug, but I don't see anything definitive.
> * h
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Tushar Teredesai wrote:
>> Hi:
>>
>> I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before
>> releasing 6.1: *
>> http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
> Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the
> bug, but I don't s
Like Randy suggested in a thread before, since version updates are a
never ending process, we should fix the non-package update bugs and
the security related bugs for 6.1.
--
Tushar Teredesai
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~tushar/
--
http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>
>
>>Tushar Teredesai wrote:
>>
>>>Hi:
>>>
>>>I would like to propose that we resolve the following bugs before
>>>releasing 6.1: *
>>>http://blfs-bugs.linuxfromscratch.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1019
>>
>>Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple
DJ Lucas wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Do we have a proposed fix? There are a couple of suggestions in the
bug, but I don't see anything definitive.
I propose writing a dev.d handler instead of the start section of thecurrent
alsa bootscript, and adding text that i
DJ Lucas wrote:
> No..it is not their problem. It is definately a distro problem.
Even if they supply the example dev.d script?
udev-064/etc/dev.d/snd/controlC0/alsa.dev:
#!/bin/sh -e
exec /usr/sbin/alsactl restore 0
IMHO a bug in the upstream example (that we would use otherwise without much
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>
>>No..it is not their problem. It is definately a distro problem.
>
>
> Even if they supply the example dev.d script?
>
> udev-064/etc/dev.d/snd/controlC0/alsa.dev:
>
> #!/bin/sh -e
> exec /usr/sbin/alsactl restore 0
>
> IMHO a bug in the u
DJ Lucas wrote:
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
DJ Lucas wrote:
No..it is not their problem. It is definately a distro problem.
Even if they supply the example dev.d script?
udev-064/etc/dev.d/snd/controlC0/alsa.dev:
#!/bin/sh -e
exec /usr/sbin/alsactl restore 0
IMHO a bug in the upstream examp
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>>
>> need to mention that if more than one sound card is
>> installed that you'll need to adjust the dev.d script and directory.
>
>
> No need to adjust the script if you replace "alsactl restore 0" with:
>
> DEV_BASENAME="${DEVNAME##*/}"
> case "
DJ Lucas wrote:
I have 4 or 5 SBLive! cards (all identical)...lets see
what happens. Never had more than 2 in a single PC before. :-)
For me to remove the FIXME, it would be sufficient to post
/etc/asound.state after setting different volumes on two identical cards
and "alsactl store".
-
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> I have 4 or 5 SBLive! cards (all identical)...lets see
>> what happens. Never had more than 2 in a single PC before. :-)
>
>
> For me to remove the FIXME, it would be sufficient to post
> /etc/asound.state after setting different volumes on t
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
> DJ Lucas wrote:
>
>> I have 4 or 5 SBLive! cards (all identical)...lets see
>> what happens. Never had more than 2 in a single PC before. :-)
>
>
> For me to remove the FIXME, it would be sufficient to post
> /etc/asound.state after setting different volumes on t
DJ Lucas wrote:
Just looked at asound.state. Two SBLive!s, that'll be long...almost 400
control blocks. Post back when I get the chance, but might not be till
tomorrow. I have to get up early. It's 23:40 here.
I have looked at http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/~dj/asound.state.bz2
The "FIXME
DJ Lucas wrote:
>
> Next issue with this is the sample soundfont loading.
Okay. The device specific scripts are run after the generic script are
run. So that /etc/dev.d/snd/alsa.dev is run, then for each card
(control?) ex:0 /etc/dev.d/snd/control0/alsa.dev is run. In this case,
all soundcard
DJ Lucas wrote:
> Bruce. This bug too was dropped to 6.2. Are we okay to pretty this one
> up and get it into the 6.1?
I see that you and Alexander have worked quite hard on this bug. We are
still going to have a week or two as a -pre release. Go ahead and update.
-- Bruce
--
http://linux
16 matches
Mail list logo
