Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Current status as of Fri Sep 12 01:31:20 CDT 2014
lfs75 packages 476
lfs76 packages 177
About 27% checked.
Six open tickets, but we could move several of the tickets for milestone
7.7 to 7.6 without affecting work already done.
Sat Sep 13 00:16:05 CDT 2014
lfs75 packages
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 04:15:09PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >On 12-09-2014 17:32, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> >
> >>
> >>Starting from scratch.
> >>
> >>Thanks for the help, Bruce.
> >>
> >
> >Forgot to say: disabled all tests in jhalfs build, they are worthless.
On Fri, Sep 12, 2014 at 05:46:02PM -0500, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Ken,
>
> I've got a couple of problems when checking clisp. First you have:
>
> mkdir build &&
> cd build &&
> ./configure ...
>
>
> That needs to be ../configure ...
>
> I can easily fix that when I tag the package.
>
Bruce,
Ken,
I've got a couple of problems when checking clisp. First you have:
mkdir build &&
cd build &&
./configure ...
That needs to be ../configure ...
I can easily fix that when I tag the package.
Secondly, you have
install -v -m644 doc/clisp.man /usr/share/man/man3/clisp_malloc.3 &&
ln -s
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 12-09-2014 17:32, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
Starting from scratch.
Thanks for the help, Bruce.
Forgot to say: disabled all tests in jhalfs build, they are worthless.
With -j1 they are good for editors to check the instructions when new
package versions a
On 12-09-2014 17:32, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>
> Starting from scratch.
>
> Thanks for the help, Bruce.
>
Forgot to say: disabled all tests in jhalfs build, they are worthless.
--
[]s,
Fernando
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/
On 12-09-2014 16:11, Armin K. wrote:
> On 12.9.2014 21:01, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 12-09-2014 14:30, Armin K. wrote:
>>> On 12.9.2014 19:18, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization
On 12-09-2014 16:19, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> On 12-09-2014 14:42, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
>>> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 12-09-2014 14:42, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
seemed to not be recognized, at least after jhalfs chrooted
On 12.9.2014 21:01, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
On 12-09-2014 14:30, Armin K. wrote:
On 12.9.2014 19:18, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
seemed to not be recogn
On 12-09-2014 14:30, Armin K. wrote:
> On 12.9.2014 19:18, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
>> LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
>> seemed to not be recognized, at least after jhalfs chrooted to c
On 12-09-2014 14:42, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
>> I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
>> LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
>> seemed to not be recognized, at least after jhalfs chrooted to chapter
>> 6).
>>
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
seemed to not be recognized, at least after jhalfs chrooted to chapter 6).
I am starting to suspect that rebuilding per would sol
On 12.9.2014 19:18, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
seemed to not be recognized, at least after jhalfs chrooted to chapter 6).
I am starting to suspect that rebu
I'm not finding where the following messages are coming from. Built
LFS7.6-rc-1 with jhalfs. Only optimization was to use -j4 (although it
seemed to not be recognized, at least after jhalfs chrooted to chapter 6).
I am starting to suspect that rebuilding per would solve it, and I would
not need to
On 12.9.2014 18:32, John Burrell wrote:
s/-session optionalpam_systemd.so/
session optional pam_systemd.so/
jb.
No, it's fine. - before session means that it should ignore the fact
that module may be absent for whatever reasons.
--
http://
s/-session optionalpam_systemd.so/
session optional pam_systemd.so/
jb.
--
http://lists.linuxfromscratch.org/listinfo/blfs-dev
FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html
Unsubscribe: See the above information page
On 12-09-2014 07:29, Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> On 11-09-2014 19:36, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:50:48AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:22:47AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
Thanks, I'll give that a go - maybe not "tonight" (I'm trying to
On 11-09-2014 19:36, Ken Moffat wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 02:50:48AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 01:22:47AM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>>> Thanks, I'll give that a go - maybe not "tonight" (I'm trying to
>>> catch up with two cycle races from Wednesday's TV, build
19 matches
Mail list logo
