Congrats to all of the members of the LFS team. This is really a great
achievement for us.
" Gossip is like a photograph. It starts with a negative, then is developed
and enlarged"
---
Regards
Mukesh Kaushal
- Original Message -
From: "Justin R. Knierim" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Devel
On 12/2/05, Nupur <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I am trying to install Gnome on my computer. And while doing make with
> Scroll keeper, I get the following error:
>
> make[3]: Entering directory
> `/home/nupur/downloads/Xfree-4.3/Gnome/scrollkeeper-0.3.14/cl/templates'
> ../../buildtoo
The LFS LiveCD Team is proud to announce the release of the x86-6.1.1-1
version of the LFS LiveCD. This version is built using LFS 6.1.1 and
BLFS packages from the svn branch. Packages for LFS 6.1.1 are included
on the LiveCD. Other new features:
* XFCE Terminal with helpful menus, includi
Dear All,
I am trying to install Gnome on my computer. And while doing make with
Scroll keeper, I get the following error:
make[3]: Entering directory
`/home/nupur/downloads/Xfree-4.3/Gnome/scrollkeeper-0.3.14/cl/templates'
../../buildtools/scrollkeeper-tree-separate scrollkeeper_cl.xml
../../cl/
Luca Dionisi wrote:
> given an installation that wants to save configuration in gconf2 or in the
> scrollkeeper database, is the behaviour of that installation similar to
> the
> one I described?
Yes. Or atleast, any differences there are don't seem to change things any.
> 2- If yes,
Hi peeps !
Heimdal broke my WVStreams Build !
when building WvStreams 4.0.1 (from latest BLFS), this happens :
libwvstreams.so: undefined reference to `fnmatch(char const*, char
const*, int)'
after some googling, I came across this :
http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports/2003-Nov
Hi Lennon
On 11/23/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Luca Dionisi wrote:
> > If I got it, you mean that any pkg installation that
> > wants to add things to that database will use this program. Right?
> Yes. It works in a similar way to gconf - package provides raw files,
> runs that ap
On 12/1/05, Jeremy Monnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Finally I get it ! OO2 works !
Last problem I had :
When I started OO2 as user I got
[EMAIL PROTECTED] # soffice
[Java framework] Error in function createUserSettingsDocument
(elements.cxx).javaldx failed!
[Java framework] Error in function creat
On 12/1/05, Dan Nicholson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just a funny thing (well, if I can say so) : it seems there's no ldap
> > support with FF 1.5. I've tried and recompile the 1.0.7, with the same
> > arguments, and I have ldap headers only with 1.0.7. I am ust a
> > beginner in that game, so
On 12/1/05, Jeremy Monnet <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 12/1/05, Stef Bon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > What you want. If Firefox is found, the OO configure script assumes you want
> > the ldapheaders from firefox, which are in a /usr/include/firefox*/ldap
> > directory. If you did not compile f
On 12/1/05, Stef Bon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> What you want. If Firefox is found, the OO configure script assumes you want
> the ldapheaders from firefox, which are in a /usr/include/firefox*/ldap
> directory. If you did not compile firefox with ldapsupport, there is no such
> directory.
> You
On 12/1/05, Stef Bon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > But I don't think I have any ldap support in firefox ? I installed all
> > and only the required softwares ...
> >
> > I have found no way to disable this ldap support in OO2, should I install
> > it ?
> What you want. If Firefox is found, the O
> I have faced similar problems with rsync from a linux box to a
> M$ box in the past till I hit upon 'unison'. I have been using
> this on a daily basis for over a year now, without any hitch:
>
> http://www.cis.upenn.edu/~bcpierce/unison/
>
> This is a GPL-ed software, written in Objective Caml
> But I don't think I have any ldap support in firefox ? I installed all
> and only the required softwares ...
>
> I have found no way to disable this ldap support in OO2, should I install
> it ?
What you want. If Firefox is found, the OO configure script assumes you want
the ldapheaders from fir
On 12/1/05, S. Anthony Sequeira <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:52 +0100, Luca Dionisi wrote:
> > That is: I've got a setuid-root bash script. It prints out the
> > effective
> > and real uid.
> > But when I run it, I won't have root privileges... Why?!?
>
> A security feature
Jeremy Monnet wrote:
I followed that to compile firefox 1.5 :
http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/xsoft/firefox.html
But I don't think I have any ldap support in firefox ? I installed all
and only the required softwares ...
You don't have ldap support in firefox because the instruc
Hi all,
I get an error compiling OO2 :
/sources/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/extensions/source/config/ldap/ldapuserprof.hxx:44:23:
ldap/ldap.h: No such file or directory
which results in
ERROR: Error 65280 occurred while making
/sources/OOo_2.0.0rc3_src/extensions/source/config/ldap
dmake: Error code 1, whil
On Wed, 30 Nov 2005, David Rosal wrote:
I've rebuilt the kernel, enabling only the two specific drivers for the
two network cards, and now eth0 is brought up, but not eth1. This looks
like a more logical behaviour.
As far as I know you're never going to get eth1 without first having eth0.
It
On Thu, 2005-12-01 at 09:52 +0100, Luca Dionisi wrote:
> That is: I've got a setuid-root bash script. It prints out the
> effective
> and real uid.
> But when I run it, I won't have root privileges... Why?!?
A security feature. Check out Google.
> Is my system acting normally?
Yes.
I'd go for
On 11/24/05, Lennon Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> And now I think of it, you can limit scrollkeeper-update to being used
> by install users by adjusting it's permissions so:
> chgrp install $(which scrollkeeper-update) && chmod o-rx $(which
> scrollkeeper-update)
Hi Lennon
I'm trying to do som
20 matches
Mail list logo
