Angel Tsankov wrote:
1. created the /etc/ppp/ip-up and the /etc/ppp/peers/pppoe files;
2. populated the /etc/ppp/pap-secrets and the /etc/ppp/chap-secrets files;
3. issued "ip link set eth0 up" (this produced no output on the terminal);
4. issued "pppd call pppoe" and I got:
Plugin rp-pppoe.so lo
Randy McMurchy wrote:
Justin The Cynical wrote these words on 06/05/06 05:14 CST:
I don't think that the OP would be able to get to a web site if the DNS
was incorrect. It sounds like the proxy isn't passing ICMP traffic.
Assuming somebody only has one PC these days is probably an incorrec
Then I executed
pppd eth0
which produced:
Plugin rp-pppoe.so loaded.
RP-PPPoE plugin version 3.3 compiled against pppd 2.4.3
Then I ping'ed an Internet host by IP address and got:
ping: sendto: Network is unreachable
Can someone help me setup a PPPoE connection using only the PPP package?
Yes,
On 6/6/06, Filip Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In appendix is two patches from Fedora, which resolve this problem.
Thanks for looking into this, Filip. These patches are already in
libxklavier-2.2. We should get that in the book. I'll open a bug.
Oh wait, there already is one. Randy,
On 6/6/06, Randy McMurchy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/06/06 11:54 CST:
> Could someone who builds the monolithic X's (Xorg-6.9.0 and
> Xfree86-4.6.0) please find out where the xkb data files go and where
> xkbcomp lives? Here's what the xkb data files look l
Dan Nicholson wrote these words on 06/06/06 11:54 CST:
> Could someone who builds the monolithic X's (Xorg-6.9.0 and
> Xfree86-4.6.0) please find out where the xkb data files go and where
> xkbcomp lives? Here's what the xkb data files look like on my system.
[EMAIL PROTECTED]: ~ > ls -l /usr/X1
On 6/6/06, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:55 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
>
> I wish I had a laptop. I'd love to give it a spin. I think Jeremy
> Utley uses NetworkManager (saw him mention it in the IRC logs). Maybe
> he can test drive it. Jeremy, do you read t
On 6/6/06, Filip Bartmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
After applying this patches, libxklavier, must be configured, witch this
switches:
-
./configure --prefix=/usr --with-xkb-base=/usr/share/X11/xkb
--with-xkb-bin-base=/usr/bin
-
On 6/6/06, Peter B. Steiger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now all the icons appear correctly, but yet again my contacts list is
gone! I cleaned out my test user's entire /home directory so there
would not be any previous config files in place, started up again so
Gnome could build whatever it want
On Tue, 2006-06-06 at 22:27 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
> I *have* had some issues with
> Evolution and contacts, but thought that to be a bug in Evo,
> particularly since it doesn't occur with 2.6 (i.e Gnome 2.14).
Funny you should mention that. I stayed up way too late last night
re-installing t
In appendix is two patches from Fedora, which resolve this problem.
Filip Bartmann
This patch is generated from running autogen.sh after applying
the upstream patch to configure.in (see libxklaver-2.1-xkb-path.patch)
and then removing the portions which are not relevant. These include
changes to w
It's caused because libxklavier isn't prepared for modular X.org.
Libxklavier search fo xkb in /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/xkb, which has been
moved in new modular X.org to /usr/share/X11/xkb, and libxklavier,
doesn't support new layout of this
directory(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=
On Fri, 2006-06-02 at 21:13 +1200, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Thu, 2006-06-01 at 16:08 +, Tasos Drosopoulos wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > I'm on my way through BLFS-svn-2006-05-28 and Xorg7.1. I have an nvidia
> > GeForce 6200 graphics card. On my previous built (~March 2005) with
> > Xorg7.0 the propr
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:00 -0600, Peter B. Steiger wrote:
> To make a long story short (too late!) what I finally realized after
> blowing the weekend on this project was that for whatever reason,
> Evolution (and possibly the Gnome panel) doesn't like having libexec
> processes in the /bin folder
On Mon, 2006-06-05 at 14:55 -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote:
> On 6/5/06, Simon Geard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > That's my intention, although I want to test it a little more thoroughly
> > first. Possibly a hint for LFS might be a good start, if anyone here
> > wants to try it out?
>
> I wish
15 matches
Mail list logo
