Re: Cams and videoconfferencing on LFS

2006-11-05 Thread Alberto Hernando
El Lunes, 6 de Noviembre de 2006 04:14, Arnie Stender escribió: >    I do have a /dev/video1394 directory with a special file '0' in it > and haven't got a clue what it is for. I tried to connect to it with the > video applications but I get nothing. Hi. video1394 is about connecting through

Re: Cams and videoconfferencing on LFS

2006-11-05 Thread Arnie Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alberto Hernando wrote: > > Hi. > > As usual, Dan is right. If you have udev working you will have a /dev/video0 > device as soon as you load the driver, and the cam is plugged in, of course. > Recently, I was given a cheap logitech quickcam webcam

Re: Opera 9.02

2006-11-05 Thread Matthew Burgess
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: It's a great web browser, but only available as a binary. Which, IMO, makes it not great at all. Free software is not about its initial cost (in monetary terms) it's about Freedom (see http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/free-sw.html). Then, since I don't have internet

Re: Cam connection to my system

2006-11-05 Thread Arnie Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan Lord wrote: > Arnie Stender wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA1 >> >> Al, >> Thanks for the input from google but it looks bad for me. It looks >> like >> the code for the driver hasn't been touched since 2003 or earlier

locales, nls...

2006-11-05 Thread Alberto Hernando
Hi. I have some problems with locales and nls, specially in vfat. Let's see: I'm Spanish, so I need locales starting in es_ES. As I want to write Japanese too, I need utf-8. So I have LC_CTYPE="es_ES.UTF-8". LANG is the same. I can create files with ñ, á é í ó ú (those were vowels with accents,

Re: Firefox 2.0 and mozconfig

2006-11-05 Thread Hans-Joachim Widmaier
Andrey Voropaev wrote: > Amazing. After building firefox on x86_64 with older version of BLFS, > I've tried it on i686 with newer version of BLFS. And it failed! The > mozconfig was exactly the same. Looks like the problem could be in the > fact that I have gtk-2.8 on the newer system. > [snip] > u

Re: Cam connection to my system

2006-11-05 Thread Alan Lord
Arnie Stender wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Al, Thanks for the input from google but it looks bad for me. It looks like the code for the driver hasn't been touched since 2003 or earlier. I don't think AMD64 CPUs were used much back then if they had been created...

Re: Cams and videoconfferencing on LFS

2006-11-05 Thread Alberto Hernando
El Sábado, 4 de Noviembre de 2006 22:37, Dan Nicholson escribió: > I don't have a video camera, but I think I understand what goes into > supporting it. First, you need to have Video For Linux support in your > kernel. That would be in Device Drivers -> Multimedia devices -> Video > For Linux. That

Re: Firefox 2.0 and mozconfig

2006-11-05 Thread Andrey Voropaev
Amazing. After building firefox on x86_64 with older version of BLFS, I've tried it on i686 with newer version of BLFS. And it failed! The mozconfig was exactly the same. Looks like the problem could be in the fact that I have gtk-2.8 on the newer system. Here's the error. c++ -I/usr/include -fr

Cam connection to my system

2006-11-05 Thread Arnie Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Al, Thanks for the input from google but it looks bad for me. It looks like the code for the driver hasn't been touched since 2003 or earlier. I don't think AMD64 CPUs were used much back then if they had been created at all. The code is geared

Re: Cams and videoconfferencing on LFS

2006-11-05 Thread Arnie Stender
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Alan Lord wrote: > > Why not just type "Intel CS330 & Linux" into Google. The first link from > the result set is: http://spca50x.sourceforge.net/spca50x.php?page=cams > > Do the same for "netmeeting & linux" and you get: > http://www.linux.org/docs/l