Re: Firefox-3.0.1

2008-08-03 Thread DJ Lucas
Lupine wrote: > I've read in here that there has been success with compiling FF3.0.1 > from scratch, as long as you have the APNG patch found in CBLFS. I've > followed that advice, and also followed the steps found here: > http://cblfs.cross-lfs.org/index.php/Firefox > ...but I continue to get the

Firefox-3.0.1

2008-08-03 Thread Lupine
I've read in here that there has been success with compiling FF3.0.1 from scratch, as long as you have the APNG patch found in CBLFS. I've followed that advice, and also followed the steps found here: http://cblfs.cross-lfs.org/index.php/Firefox ...but I continue to get the following error: make[

Re: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 Segmentation Fault [SOLVED]

2008-08-03 Thread Dan McGhee
Chris Staub wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > >> Dan McGhee wrote: >> >> >>> Googling reveals many reasons for segmentation faults and a similar >>> situation for me three years ago. I solved it by installing fontconfig >>> as root--I use the more_control package system. I'm more experienced

Re: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 Segmentation Fault

2008-08-03 Thread Dan McGhee
Dan Nicholson wrote: > I think moz_pis_startstop_scripts is probably a function in > run-mozilla.sh. So I don't think the script part is the problem. This > would need to be run under a debugger to see what's crashing > thunderbird. strace won't help much since the crash is happening > within thund

Re: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 Segmentation Fault

2008-08-03 Thread Dan Nicholson
On Tue, Jul 29, 2008 at 6:41 PM, Dan McGhee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I compiled and built Thunderbird, on my laptop, in accordance with the > instructions in BLFS-svn-20080712. There were no errors. When I try to run > it as root, I get: > > /usr/lib/thunderbird-2.0.0.12/run-mozilla.sh line 1

Re: Thunderbird 2.0.0.12 Segmentation Fault

2008-08-03 Thread Dan McGhee
Chris Staub wrote: > DJ Lucas wrote: > >> Dan McGhee wrote: >> >> >> Well, font problems do have a history of making Firefox choke, so I'm >> not so sure your "band-aide" wasn't a proper fix. I don't recall >> specifically Thunderbird having issues with fonts, but it is usually >> insta