TheOldFellow wrote:
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:33:30 +0100
Jeremy Henty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
... the Wiki is mostly supplemental information for packages that
are in the book - alternative configurations, optional
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 04:31:59PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
I didn't know
that the firefox code can build xulrunner, and I still don't
understand that - in particular, where do you get the .pc files
which epiphany and yelp will look for ?
Sorry, a bad 'find' on my part - I was looking for
BLFS has two sources of extra information outside the book itself:
Hints and the Wiki. What's the difference between the two? Have
hints been obsoleted by the Wiki? If not, when is it appropriate to
create a Hint instead of a Wiki page?
Regards,
Jeremy Henty
--
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 00:01 +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
For anyone else tempted to try the webkit renderer with epiphany
(and with the yelp branch) - expect problems. Sure, it all builds
without any issues, but the text is somewhat small (or too small
to read in yelp), and the Save As option in
On Wed, 2008-10-15 at 10:08 +0100, Jeremy Henty wrote:
BLFS has two sources of extra information outside the book itself:
Hints and the Wiki. What's the difference between the two? Have
hints been obsoleted by the Wiki? If not, when is it appropriate to
create a Hint instead of a
On Wed, 15 Oct 2008 12:33:30 +0100
Jeremy Henty [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
... the Wiki is mostly supplemental information for packages that
are in the book - alternative configurations, optional dependencies,
etc. Whereas
On Wed, Oct 15, 2008 at 11:41:14PM +1300, Simon Geard wrote:
... the Wiki is mostly supplemental information for packages that
are in the book - alternative configurations, optional dependencies,
etc. Whereas the hints are mostly for things that just aren't
covered by the books at
