Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Aleksandar Kuktin wrote: > > AFAIK, what is knows as USB 2.0 is called EHCI in kernelworld. Judging [...] > As you have a VIA based motherboard, you should enable UHCI and EHCI to > get "basic" USB functionality and then maybe enable aditional kernel > options (mouse? keyboard? printer?). Exter

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Trent Shea wrote: [some good stuff] > If you can run lspci -v from a running known 'good' configuration you should > get some usefule info, too. Thanks! Mike -- p="p=%c%s%c;main(){printf(p,34,p,34);}";main(){printf(p,34,p,34);} Oppose globalization and One World Governments like the UN. This

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Aleksandar Kuktin
>On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:02:56 -0600 >Mike McCarty wrote: > > Andrew Benton wrote: > > On 16/03/10 03:54, Mike McCarty wrote: > >> OHCI -- UHCI > >> > >> Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? > > > > lspci from pci-utils > > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/pciut

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Matthew Burgess wrote: > The kernel's menuconfig help text for EHCI says: [...] > For OHCI it states: > > "On most non-x86 systems, and on x86 hardware that's not using a USB > controller > from Intel or VIA, this is probably appropriate." It even suggests that > 'lspci -v' > will provide the

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Trent Shea
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 14:02:56 Mike McCarty wrote: > Obviously, UHCI is necessary. However, what about the devices simply > listed as USB 2.0 (rev xx) where xx is either 65 or 82? They are > seemingly not the same devices as the UHCI USB 1.1, as the USB > "level" shows. However, the required pro

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Tue, 16 Mar 2010 14:02:56 -0600, Mike McCarty wrote: > Is one just to "know" by some means that all USB 2.0 conform to > one or the other of UHCI or OHCI? The kernel's menuconfig help text for EHCI says: "If you configure EHCI, you should probably configure the OHCI (for NEC and some other

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Mike McCarty
Andrew Benton wrote: > On 16/03/10 03:54, Mike McCarty wrote: >> OHCI -- UHCI >> >> Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? > > lspci from pci-utils > http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/pciutils.html I'm aware of lspci; however, it does not provide all the informati

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread Andrew Benton
On 16/03/10 03:54, Mike McCarty wrote: > OHCI -- UHCI > > Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? lspci from pci-utils http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/view/svn/general/pciutils.html Andy -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratc

Re: OHCI vs UHCI

2010-03-16 Thread lux-integ
On Tuesday 16 March 2010 03:54:51 am Mike McCarty wrote: > OHCI -- UHCI > > Ok, how does one determine which of these he needs? Is it possible > that one would need both, with some hardware setups? I normally have the more popular UHCIi in kernel and OHCI as a kernel module -- http://linuxfroms