On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 01:28 -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> GConf will soon die! :-) Or at least that was planned, hopefully things
> haven't changed.
Yes, it's on it's way out, but not quickly. Packages are gradually
migrating to glib's settings API (backed by dconf), but since it's not
one of the "mus
On Mon, 2011-02-07 at 01:33 +, Ken Moffat wrote:
> I still remember the days when BLFS was close to the bleeding edge.
> So, FWIW, here is a list of the gnome and related packages I've just
> built to try out gnome-2.32 (without gtk+-3, since the only versions
> available are for development).
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 05:34:56PM -0500, Casey Daniels wrote:
> I finally was able to finish my first LFS system and it was a fun time.
> Now I have some questions. I plan on building my second build that I
> actually plan on using but didn't understand much about Package
> Management or Upg
I finally was able to finish my first LFS system and it was a fun time.
Now I have some questions. I plan on building my second build that I
actually plan on using but didn't understand much about Package
Management or Upgrading. From the Short info in the Book it looks like
the Symlink Met
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 01:28:57AM -0600, DJ Lucas wrote:
> On 02/06/2011 07:33 PM, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
>
> >gtk+-2.22.1
>
> Yes, I had forgotten about the legacy icon names. Sorry, I wish I
> had mentioned that earlier to save you some research time. Patch I
> used is attached, no need for auto
On Mon, Feb 07, 2011 at 07:46:58AM +, Jeremy Henty wrote:
>
> Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> > poppler-0.16.0 - not gnome, but is stable
> >
> > epdfview-0.1.7 - needs a patch for this version of poppler : I found
> > mine at pld, 'touch ChangeLog && autoreconf' worked for me.
>
> pld??? (I'm keen
