Re: [blfs-support] Gnome dependency hell...

2012-09-11 Thread Armin K.
Dana 11.9.2012 5:54, Michael C. Robinson je napisao: > I'm in dependency hell trying to install the core packages for gnome :-0 > > NetworkManager is recommended which recommends ConsoleKit which > recommends Pam. I can't get Pam to compile let > alone install and I don't think I need it anyways.

Re: [blfs-support] XFCE4 Power Manager howto

2012-09-11 Thread Kenno Han
Okay... I'm compiling upower now. All I got is a lot of lines telling undefined reference to `g_udev_device *blah* *blah* *blah* Of course, I have gudev installed. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See th

Re: [blfs-support] Gnome dependency hell...

2012-09-11 Thread John Burrell
> NetworkManager is recommended which recommends ConsoleKit which > recommends Pam. I can't get Pam to compile let > alone install and I don't think I need it anyways. Another issue, Pam-1.1.5 needs a patch or a sed which I posted on blfs-support last month. See the archives for it. jb

[blfs-support] patch names

2012-09-11 Thread John Burrell
Bruce - Thanks for removing the \ in the mysql commands. Much better now. One last tiny request. The names of patches have a convention - the source name and version followed by some descriptor .patch I think all the LFS and BLFS patches conform to this - except one (that I've found, anyway)

Re: [blfs-support] Gnome dependency hell...

2012-09-11 Thread Ken Moffat
On Mon, Sep 10, 2012 at 08:54:45PM -0700, Michael C. Robinson wrote: > I'm in dependency hell trying to install the core packages for gnome :-0 > > NetworkManager is recommended which recommends ConsoleKit which > recommends Pam. I can't get Pam to compile let > alone install and I don't think

Re: [blfs-support] patch names

2012-09-11 Thread Armin K.
On 11.09.2012 16:10, John Burrell wrote: > Bruce - > > Thanks for removing the \ in the mysql commands. Much better now. > > One last tiny request. The names of patches have a convention - > > the source name and version followed by some descriptor .patch > > I think all the LFS and BLFS patches co

Re: [blfs-support] patch names

2012-09-11 Thread Armin K.
On 11.09.2012 17:18, Armin K. wrote: > On 11.09.2012 16:10, John Burrell wrote: >> Bruce - >> >> Thanks for removing the \ in the mysql commands. Much better now. >> >> One last tiny request. The names of patches have a convention - >> >> the source name and version followed by some descriptor .pat

Re: [blfs-support] patch names

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Armin K. wrote: > On 11.09.2012 17:18, Armin K. wrote: >> On 11.09.2012 16:10, John Burrell wrote: >>> Bruce - >>> >>> Thanks for removing the \ in the mysql commands. Much better now. >>> >>> One last tiny request. The names of patches have a convention - >>> >>> the source name and version follow

Re: [blfs-support] patch names

2012-09-11 Thread John Burrell
> Generally, the naming is tarball_stem dash tarball_version dash > descriptor (without dashes) dash patch_version (usually 1) dot patch. > >-- Bruce > Thanks for the full description. That's perfectly clear. jb. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/

[blfs-support] Gnome and Hunspell

2012-09-11 Thread Michael C. Robinson
I installed Hunspell, but when it came to installing a dictionary I found the link to be broken... Trying to compile enchant which detects Hunspell, the compile bombs on can not find hunspell.cxx. Background for people confused about my goals concerning Gnome: As far as installing Gnome in a

Re: [blfs-support] Gnome and Hunspell

2012-09-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Michael C. Robinson wrote: > I hope the Gnome people realize that Gnome is getting to be like > Windows 98 was back in the day where everyone screamed about Internet > Explorer being integrated when they wanted Netscape instead. I > realize that evolution usually comes with Gnome, but I don't nee

Re: [blfs-support] Gnome and Hunspell

2012-09-11 Thread Michael C. Robinson
Quoting Bruce Dubbs : > Michael C. Robinson wrote: > >> I hope the Gnome people realize that Gnome is getting to be like >> Windows 98 was back in the day where everyone screamed about Internet >> Explorer being integrated when they wanted Netscape instead. I >> realize that evolution usually com

[blfs-support] Glib-1.242 not at given url

2012-09-11 Thread John Burrell
Please note that the available versions of the perl module Glib are now 1.260 and 1.261 jb. -- http://linuxfromscratch.org/mailman/listinfo/blfs-support FAQ: http://www.linuxfromscratch.org/blfs/faq.html Unsubscribe: See the above information page