On Sun, 2012-11-11 at 10:56 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> I have no problems with it either, but LFS/BLFS people seem to reject
> systemd (for now).
Understandable. I like the concept, but it's not exactly ideal from the
point of view of a project trying to teach people how their system works
- the tr
Fernando de Oliveira wrote:
> Em 11-11-2012 00:05, James Pinto escreveu:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> Im using the book Beyond Linux^® From Scratch - Version 2012-07-10
>
> [Armin, there is an old small typo in the "Warning":
>
> s/when untaring as root:/when untaring as root/]
>
> Should I/you create a ticket to
--- Em dom, 11/11/12, Fernando de Oliveira escreveu:
> De: Fernando de Oliveira
> Assunto: Re: [blfs-support] Libre office 3.5.4.2
> Para: "BLFS Support List"
> Data: Domingo, 11 de Novembro de 2012, 8:56
> Em 11-11-2012 00:05, James Pinto
> escreveu:
>
> > Hi
> >
> > Im using the book Beyond Li
Em 11-11-2012 00:05, James Pinto escreveu:
> Hi
>
> Im using the book Beyond Linux^® From Scratch - Version 2012-07-10
[Armin, there is an old small typo in the "Warning":
s/when untaring as root:/when untaring as root/]
Should I/you create a ticket to remember when upgrading to the next
versi
On 11/11/2012 10:10 AM, Simon Geard wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 00:00 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
>> I forgot to mention that it is becoming more and more integrated with
>> systemd for user session management, so it is just matter of time where
>> systemd will be required.
>
> Yeah, that's true enou
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 02:17 +0100, Aleksandar Kuktin wrote:
> Funny, a few months back, my system HDD (the one with the root
> directory and /usr directory) died while the system was in operation.
> You know how I noticed? Barely did at first, since all existing
> programs which were already in mem
On Sat, 2012-11-10 at 00:00 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> I forgot to mention that it is becoming more and more integrated with
> systemd for user session management, so it is just matter of time where
> systemd will be required.
Yeah, that's true enough. I don't necessarily see that as a bad thing
t
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 23:34 +0100, Armin K. wrote:
> And as I've read somewhere, GNOME 3.10 or 3.12 might actualy become
> GNOME 4 and it will be used for GNOME OS - an operating system mostly
> for touch devices.
Be careful what you read about such things - there's a huge difference
between the
On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 14:18 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote:
> Yes, I used to run that when I had to run Windows at work. I got some
> very humorous reactions to those seeing it for the first time.
>
Likewise. However, I stopped using that screensaver after some helpful
person rebooted the affected co
