On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 02:45:16PM +0100, Ken Moffat wrote:
>
> Meanwhile, if you do get an ICE and
> it does repeat - even after falling back to make -j1 - then before
> saying it's a real compiler problem (or if it used to work on the
> same compiler and package versions!), try dropping the ca
On Tue, Jun 12, 2012 at 01:31:52PM +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:32:15 +0100
> "Armin K." wrote:
>
> >
> > Hm, I have experienced same problem twice in last 24 hours. First time
> > it was with gcc building ffmpeg (not sure if ffmpeg 0.11, ffmpeg bundled
> > with mplayer
On Tue, 12 Jun 2012 11:32:15 +0100
"Armin K." wrote:
> On 06/11/2012 06:18 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> > On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:05:58 +0100
> > Andrew Benton wrote:
> >
> >> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:32:09 +0100
> >> Matthew Burgess wrote:
> >>
> >>> There's useful info at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#
On 06/11/2012 06:18 PM, Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:05:58 +0100
> Andrew Benton wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:32:09 +0100
>> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>>
>>> There's useful info at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#detailed as to what they'd
>>> expect your report to contain.
>>
>> Tha
On Thu, 07 Jun 2012 23:05:58 +0100
Andrew Benton wrote:
> On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:32:09 +0100
> Matthew Burgess wrote:
>
> > There's useful info at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#detailed as to what they'd
> > expect your report to contain.
>
> Thanks to your suggestion I took the plunge and opened a
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:32:09 +0100
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> The ICE is definitely a bug in GCC, so should be reported upstream (I did
> a quick search at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ for force_move_args_size_note
> and didn't get any hits).
>
> There's useful info at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#det
On Wed, 06 Jun 2012 12:32:09 +0100
Matthew Burgess wrote:
> The ICE is definitely a bug in GCC, so should be reported upstream (I did
> a quick search at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/ for force_move_args_size_note
> and didn't get any hits).
>
> There's useful info at http://gcc.gnu.org/bugs/#det
On Wed, 6 Jun 2012 12:21:02 +0100, Andrew Benton wrote:
> I have previously built Libre Office 3.5.3 on i686 with Gcc 4.7, what
> was different this time was that I used a git pull of the Gcc 4.7
> branch. Ie, Gcc had changes that had been checked into the Gcc 4.7
> branch since gcc-4.7.0 was rel
Hello All,
Libre Office 3.5.3 compiles fine for me with Gcc 4.7 on x86_64 but on
i686 the build dies with this error:
Making:all_uno-skeletonmaker.dpobj
Compiling: unodevtools/source/skeletonmaker/skeletonmaker.cxx
Compiling: unodevtools/source/skeletonmaker/skeletoncommon.cxx
/home/andy/save/
