On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:04:02 -0700
Justin The Cynical [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an older system running LFS 6.1 (currently using kernel 2.6.16.32
P4), and I am finding the on-board SiS900 network chip to be lacking.
I have sitting around in my parts collection an HP J3171-60011 PCI
TheOldFellow wrote:
On Fri, 21 Sep 2007 12:04:02 -0700
Justin The Cynical [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I have an older system running LFS 6.1 (currently using kernel 2.6.16.32
P4), and I am finding the on-board SiS900 network chip to be lacking.
I have sitting around in my parts collection an
Justin The Cynical wrote:
I have an older system running LFS 6.1 (currently using kernel 2.6.16.32
P4), and I am finding the on-board SiS900 network chip to be lacking.
I have sitting around in my parts collection an HP J3171-60011 PCI LAN
10/100TX card (Intel 82557 based) and a 3Com
Justin The Cynical wrote:
I have an older system running LFS 6.1 (currently using kernel 2.6.16.32
P4), and I am finding the on-board SiS900 network chip to be lacking.
I have sitting around in my parts collection an HP J3171-60011 PCI LAN
10/100TX card (Intel 82557 based) and a 3Com
Alexander E. Patrakov wrote:
Justin The Cynical wrote:
I have an older system running LFS 6.1 (currently using kernel 2.6.16.32
P4), and I am finding the on-board SiS900 network chip to be lacking.
I have sitting around in my parts collection an HP J3171-60011 PCI LAN
10/100TX card (Intel
On Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:10:22 +0600
Alexander E. Patrakov [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Tests at the Urals State University show that on Pentium MMX 166 MHz
with 128 MB of RAM machines, 3COM 3C905B and Intel Pro 100 cards
behave approximately identically, and are both slower than a cheap
I have an older system running LFS 6.1 (currently using kernel 2.6.16.32
P4), and I am finding the on-board SiS900 network chip to be lacking.
I have sitting around in my parts collection an HP J3171-60011 PCI LAN
10/100TX card (Intel 82557 based) and a 3Com 3C905-TX.
I've looked around, and I
