Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted

2010-01-13 Thread Fernando Oliveira
--- Em ter, 12/1/10, William Tracy escreveu: > De: William Tracy > Assunto: Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted > Para: "BLFS Support List" > Data: Terça-feira, 12 de Janeiro de 2010, 21:41 > On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:00 AM, > Matthew Burgess > > w

Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted

2010-01-12 Thread William Tracy
On Mon, Jan 11, 2010 at 2:00 AM, Matthew Burgess wrote: > Actually, I believe that upstream are moving toward a config-less X. And they are making significant headway. I looked at the xorg.conf for a recent Ubuntu install and was shocked at how empty it was. -- William Tracy Work: wtr...@cisc

Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted

2010-01-12 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:27:18 -0600, Bruce Dubbs wrote: > Matthew Burgess wrote: >> Actually, I believe that upstream are moving toward a config-less X. I > find this >> much easier but the book currently doesn't support it out of the box due > to some >> incompatible configure switches used betwe

Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted

2010-01-11 Thread Bruce Dubbs
Matthew Burgess wrote: > On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:06:29 +, Ken Moffat > wrote: >> 2010/1/11 Bruce Dubbs : >>> Xorg -configure >>> >>> will tell you what kind of video card X finds. Look at ~/xorg.conf.new > > Actually, I believe that upstream are moving toward a config-less X. I find > thi

Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted

2010-01-11 Thread Matthew Burgess
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 01:06:29 +, Ken Moffat wrote: > 2010/1/11 Bruce Dubbs : >> >>  Xorg -configure >> >> will tell you what kind of video card X finds.  Look at ~/xorg.conf.new Actually, I believe that upstream are moving toward a config-less X. I find this much easier but the book current

Re: Xorg desktop viewed through fog - Sorted

2010-01-10 Thread Ken Moffat
2010/1/11 Bruce Dubbs : > Ken Moffat wrote: >> 2010/1/10 Bruce Dubbs : >>> What are you doing?  If it's xorg -config  , did you add the -retro >>> flag? > >>         Driver      "ati" > > This is really the only important part. > >> Also forgot to mention that this is a TFT monitor. >> >> Will try