Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-06 Thread Matthew Burgess
Jörg W Mittag wrote: Matthew Burgess wrote: So, another case of NIH syndrome. Rather than report bugs/offer patches to existing projects (tar vs. star, make vs. smake, etc.) he goes and reinvents the wheel. Oh well, I guess it's his time to waste :-) So, yes there *is* a case of NIH synd

Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-06 Thread Jörg W Mittag
Matthew Burgess wrote: > So, another case of NIH syndrome. Rather than report bugs/offer patches > to existing projects (tar vs. star, make vs. smake, etc.) he goes and > reinvents the wheel. Oh well, I guess it's his time to waste :-) I don't like Jörg Schilling very much, but you are being p

Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-05 Thread Arnie Stender
Ken Moffat wrote: As a user of architectures other than x86, cdrecord itself is a pain in the proverbial to build. Ken Hi Ken, As I remember cdrecord didn't give me any grief at all. I decided to use it because k3b was giving me so much trouble. I never did get that one working. Arnie -

Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 9/5/06, Ken Moffat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/libs/security/linux-privs/kernel-2.4/ > Does that mean this is obsolete 2.4 stuff ? /me doesn't have any non-debian|ubuntu distros handy. I don't really know. Fedora and SuSE are still installing it... http:

Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-05 Thread Ken Moffat
On Tue, Sep 05, 2006 at 03:14:02PM -0700, Dan Nicholson wrote: > On 9/5/06, Alessandro Alocci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > >Hi, sys/capability.h is installed from libcap and in this version of > >capability.h are also defined CAP_EFFECTIVE and CAP_SET. > >Maybe you want to have a look at the fi

Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-05 Thread Dan Nicholson
On 9/5/06, Alessandro Alocci <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Ken Moffat wrote: > In cdrecord/cdrecord.c it includes sys/capability.h. I don't have > one of these (on a clfs box). The defines it uses are CAP_SYS_RAWIO > (in linux/capability.h), CAP_EFFECTIVE and CAP_SET (neither is > present on thi

Re: cdrkit, yet another cdrecord fork

2006-09-05 Thread Alessandro Alocci
Ken Moffat wrote: > In cdrecord/cdrecord.c it includes sys/capability.h. I don't have > one of these (on a clfs box). The defines it uses are CAP_SYS_RAWIO > (in linux/capability.h), CAP_EFFECTIVE and CAP_SET (neither is > present on this box). I don't know if this will be a problem with > old