The 0.0028% number is low, but I wonder what the effect will be on the
sites that use webkit-pictograph today. Will they get another font
containing the same glyphs, or is there a risk a symbol won't show at all?
If they "just" gets a differently looking font, then the risk is even
smaller.
We discussed this at the API Owners meeting and we did not see that the
move to a special tab in devtools changes the how to look at
deprecations of an indeterminate length.
The problem with deprecations of an indeterminate length is two-fold:
* They can be around for a long time which will
Hello :)
> Could you maybe write a few lines that explain what this does and how
developers are expected to use it?
The change standardize the following 2 things:
- the condition to open minimal popup
- whether to open popup or not isn't normative. browsers can:
- provide
LGTM3
/Daniel
On Wednesday, 10 November 2021 at 20:13:16 UTC+1 yoav...@chromium.org wrote:
> Sounds good! LGTM2
>
> On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:03 PM Christian Biesinger
> wrote:
>
>> Yes, dholbert's concerns should be addressed by relying on resize
>> observer timing, which the spec now uses.
Sounds good! LGTM2
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 8:03 PM Christian Biesinger
wrote:
> Yes, dholbert's concerns should be addressed by relying on resize
> observer timing, which the spec now uses. I'll ping him to comment in
> the issue.
>
> With regards to WPT tests, I will of course write them, I
On Wednesday, November 10, 2021 at 2:29:17 AM UTC+1 Mason Freed wrote:
> Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org
>
> Explainerhttps://arai-a.github.io/window-open-features/proposal.html
>
That not really an explainer, in the sense that it outlines the algorithmic
changes to HTML, but not the
Yes, dholbert's concerns should be addressed by relying on resize
observer timing, which the spec now uses. I'll ping him to comment in
the issue.
With regards to WPT tests, I will of course write them, I thought I
had a note to that effect in chromestatus; it must have gotten lost
somewhere.
Removal seems reasonable with those numbers. What's the deprecation
timeline you're looking for?
On Monday, November 8, 2021 at 9:50:42 AM UTC+1 ssi...@igalia.com wrote:
> Hi Yoav,
>
> https://chromestatus.com/metrics/feature/timeline/popularity/3986
>
> Monthly average on 1 Nov: 0.002803%
>
On Friday, October 29, 2021 at 9:19:58 PM UTC+2 Christian Biesinger wrote:
> Contact emails
>
> cbiesin...@chromium.org, vmp...@chromium.org
>
> Explainer
>
> https://gist.github.com/cbiesinger/f2378dbcd215495c3a1daf9696a8e91f
>
> Specification
>
>
How long of a delay are we talking about here? Weeks? Months? Years?
On Monday, October 25, 2021 at 11:00:46 PM UTC+2 Harald Alvestrand wrote:
> The scalability modes (being able to set them) are the point of the launch.
> Figuring out which of the desired ones are available seems like it would
Hola Yoav,
We've gone through several iterations of the WCO spec reviewed by Joshua
Bell from Google, and while we are still making changes to it, we believe
it is in a much better state and want to resubmit for consideration of the
approvals needed for I2S. See the updated spec below:
Chromium has been running HTTP cache partitioning for a while (which is
amazing, thanks team!), but we know that blink cache is still not
partitioned and can be used for cross-site tracking.
We see that some work has been done in that direction [1], but it wasn't
finished and the issue state
12 matches
Mail list logo
