Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HDR CSS Media Queries

LGTM1 to ship `dynamic-range` without the video prefixed variant. On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 4:42 AM Will Cassella wrote: > Sorry for the delay! I'm currently working on that, it'll most likely be > up some time tomorrow. That only covers the video-* media features, given > that Safari has already s

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Dark mode support for web apps

Contact emailsloubr...@google.com, glen...@chromium.org, mgi...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/manifest-incubations/blob/gh-pages/user-preferences-explainer.md Specification Summary Add a field to the web app manifest which allows apps to specify a different theme color and back

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

Given that the Handwriting Recognition OT ends with M97, and M98 branches today, it seems like it will be difficult to ship in M98 - a merge request to enable the feature is unlikely to be approved. Blink Owners: Would it be acceptable to extend the OT for 1 additional milestone (end in M98) and s

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HDR CSS Media Queries

Sorry for the delay! I'm currently working on that, it'll most likely be up some time tomorrow. That only covers the video-* media features, given that Safari has already shipped the regular (non-prefixed) dynamic-range media feature, should we go ahead with shipping that and follow up with video-d

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Handwriting Recognition API

Contact emails q...@chromium.org, hongli...@chromium.org, mgi...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/handwriting-recognition/blob/main/explainer.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/handwriting-recognition/ [in review] Design docs https://github.com/WICG/handwriting-recognition

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

Harald said: "It seems like we don't have a strong push towards either the MediaCapabilities or the Codec Capabilities solution in the issue on the sender side (https://github.com/w3c/webrtc-svc/issues/49). This is bad for quick resolution." [BA] On the receiver/decoder side (for WebRTC-SVC,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Remove: HTTP/2 and gQUIC server push

Clarification: I'm talking about the experiment evaluating the effect of using Early Hints. We have been collaborating with a CDN and their customers for the experiment. On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 9:08 AM Kenichi Ishibashi wrote: > We have early results that indicate improvements on FCP/LCP. We'd li

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Remove: HTTP/2 and gQUIC server push

We have early results that indicate improvements on FCP/LCP. We'd like to talk to some experiment participants to confirm these results. On Thu, Dec 9, 2021 at 3:06 AM yue li wrote: > It's 3 weeks now, we're waiting for the update. Anything I missed? > > 在2021年11月17日星期三 UTC+8 00:08:26 写道： > >> H

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Convert adoptedStyleSheets to use ObservableArray

Hi Camille, Thanks for the question. I guess I have two points/questions: 1. That sounds like a general question about adoptedStyleSheets (which we shipped a few years ago), and isn't at all particular to the conversion from FrozenArray to ObservableArray. But did I miss something relevant about t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Window Controls Overlay for Installed Desktop Web Apps

LGTM2 On Tue, Dec 7, 2021 at 2:36 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > *LGTM1* > Thanks for driving those discussions and making the spec interoperable in > the process. > > On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 11:07:21 AM UTC+1 Diego González wrote: > >> Just as a heads up, all concerns have been addressed and th

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl Enumeration API (for m99)

[for m99 AFTER m98 branching off Dec 9, 2021] Contact emailsft...@google.com Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-enumeration Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-intl-enumeration/ Design docs design doc h

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Intl Enumeration API (for m99)

Sorry, I intend to send out Intend to Ship email but copy/paste the wrong one. I will send another one On Wed, Dec 8, 2021 at 10:43 AM Frank Tang wrote: > [for m99 AFTER m98 branch off Dec 9 2021] > > Contact emailsft...@google.com > > Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-enumeration >

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Intl Enumeration API (for m99)

[for m99 AFTER m98 branch off Dec 9 2021] Contact emailsft...@google.com Explainerhttps://github.com/tc39/proposal-intl-enumeration Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-intl-enumeration/ Design docs design doc https

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Intl Locale Info in ECMA402 (for m99)

[for m99, AFTER branching off m98 Dec 9, 2021] Contact emailsft...@google.com, s...@google.com Specificationhttps://tc39.es/proposal-intl-locale-info/ Design docs https://docs.google.com/document/d/1OwEsvs8VQwvR-ug01xLyIwpgcvUfaP24u9owc7aBKJ4 Update slides for TC39 2021-Dec-15

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Remove: HTTP/2 and gQUIC server push

It's 3 weeks now, we're waiting for the update. Anything I missed? 在2021年11月17日星期三 UTC+8 00:08:26 写道： > Hi, > > We are waiting on results from an ongoing experiment to confirm that > Early Hints works and improves performance. There should be an update > in three weeks. > > Bence > > On Thu, Nov

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

The relevant tests are css/css-cascade/layer-*.html and css/css-cascade/revert-layer-*.html They are failing on wpt.fyi because the feature is not enabled there. The feature is not behind the "experimental web platform features" flag. All tests (except https://crbug.com/1277637) are currently pas

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

Am Mi., 8. Dez. 2021 um 17:52 Uhr schrieb Philip Jägenstedt < foo...@chromium.org>: > Hi Harald, > > Can you spell out what the uncontroversial parts of this would be? Looking > at the IDL in https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-svc/ it looks like it's all > about modes. > > My guess is that it's RTCRtpEn

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove font-family -webkit-standard

Friendly-pinging Mike's ping of Rick's suggestion. Is that analysis something you can spend some time on before we ship this? -mike On Mon, Nov 29, 2021 at 3:34 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > (sorry to disappear on PTO for much of this discussion) > > +1 to what Rick is suggesting here, the risk is l

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC Scalable Video Coding extensions

Hi Harald, Can you spell out what the uncontroversial parts of this would be? Looking at the IDL in https://w3c.github.io/webrtc-svc/ it looks like it's all about modes. My guess is that it's RTCRtpEncodingParameters's scalabilityMode, but is that right? Best regards, Philip On Mon, Dec 6, 2021

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CORS non-wildcard request-header

>From my perspective, it's a bit worrying that you found user-visible breakage in a random sampling of the otherwise small number of sites that fall into this category. As Yoav suggested, there's some additional likelihood that we're not seeing some breakage that requires sign-in. It might be w

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: NDEFReader makeReadOnly()

This is exciting! It'd be great to see the explainer expanded with a fuller discussion of this API, which problems it solves (with example code), and a discussion of potential UI treatments. Thanks for driving this. Alex On Tuesday, December 7, 2021 at 10:52:34 PM UTC-8 François Beaufort wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS cascade layers

Hi Xiaocheng, Can you identify the tests in https://wpt.fyi/results/css/css-cascade?label=master&label=experimental&product=chrome&product=firefox&product=safari&aligned that are for cascade layers? I think revert-layer-*.html are relevant to this intent, but is failing in Chrome Dev. Is this beca

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HDR CSS Media Queries

Friendly ping on Yoav's suggestion. Did y'all file a TAG review request? -mike On Wed, Dec 1, 2021 at 11:47 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Since we're talking about adding a full new class of MQs, that seems > worthy of a TAG discussion. > > On Tuesday, November 30, 2021 at 1:38:13 AM UTC+1 Will Casse