[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Remove Authorization header upon cross-origin redirect

Contact emailsba...@chromium.org Specificationhttps://fetch.spec.whatwg.org/#http-redirect-fetch Summary Remove Authorization header on cross origin redirects to scope a developer-controlled Authorization header to the origin of the initial request. Blink componentBlink>Loader

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FileSystemFileHandle.move() for local files

Thanks! Unnecessary LGTM4 :) On Thu, Feb 2, 2023, 00:23 Austin Sullivan wrote: > Thank you all! > > On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 8:52:21 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: > Thank you Austin. Sorry for my confusion and then my delay in response. So > since there's already broad support for FileSyst

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FileSystemFileHandle.move() for local files

Thank you all! On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 8:52:21 AM UTC-8 Rick Byers wrote: Thank you Austin. Sorry for my confusion and then my delay in response. So since there's already broad support for FileSystemHandle.move() and chromium has already approved a path for obtaining a FileSystemHandle

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Cookies Having Independent Partitioned State (CHIPS)

Hey all, Another quick update. Due to a partitioned cookies privacy bug that was discovered, we have to delay the launch of CHIPS to M110, which is the most recent release with the patch. Since M110 has been released to beta, we have

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: web-share permission policy

Thanks, Marcos. I’ll take care on the Chrome side. Cheers, Tom On Wed 1. Feb 2023 at 18:02 Marcos Caceres wrote: > Hi Blink-Dev friends, > > Over on the WebKit side we published a PSA for developers about the > permission policy change: > https://webkit.org/blog/13708/allowing-web-share-on-thir

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: web-share permission policy

Hi Blink-Dev friends, Over on the WebKit side we published a PSA for developers about the permission policy change: https://webkit.org/blog/13708/allowing-web-share-on-third-party-sites/ As this change affects all browsers and quite a few sites, it would be amazing if folks doing developer rel

[blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Battery status API gated by permissions policy

Contact emails wei4.w...@intel.com Explainer https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy Specification https://w3c.github.io/battery/#permissions-policy-integration Summary Battery status API gated by permissions policy provides developers with a way to co

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FileSystemFileHandle.move() for local files

Thank you Austin. Sorry for my confusion and then my delay in response. So since there's already broad support for FileSystemHandle.move() and chromium has already approved a path for obtaining a FileSystemHandle for a local file, this seems like a pretty minor delta to me to allow them together. T

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: animation-composition property

LGTM3 -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "blink-dev" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to blink-dev+unsubscr...@chromium.org. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/a/chro

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FileSystemFileHandle.move() for local files

LGTM2 On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:12 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Thanks Austin! > > Does the pull request cover both the OPFS and the local file system sides > of the API? > > > On Wednesday, February 1, 2023 at 1:44:42 AM UTC+1 ajayra...@google.com > wrote: > >> Hello API owners, >> >> The team is ta

Re: [blink-dev] Re: [discuss-webrtc] Deprecated "track" and "stream" stats are unshipped in M109.

Thanks so much for driving the rollback and Intent to Deprecate, Henrik. On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 12:41 AM Henrik Boström wrote: > Yes, the experiment has been rolled back on Stable. Note that users need > to restart their browser to get the new config. > > On Mon, Jan 30, 2023 at 11:22 PM Sudhee

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Updated dialog initial focus algorithm

LGTM3 On Thu, Jan 26, 2023 at 10:54 AM Joey Arhar wrote: > The HTML spec PR has been merged: > https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/8199#event-8362454584 > Firefox has given a positive signal: > https://github.com/mozilla/standards-positions/issues/734#issuecomment-1404755193 > > > It won't be ha

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: animation-composition property

LGTM2 On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 2:30 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1. Thanks for catching us up here! > > On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 2:23:24 PM UTC+1 Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org > > ExplainerAlready works as part of Web Animations API, adding the CSS > version no

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: WebRTC's RTCStats of type "track" and "stream".

Enabling by default on Canary and then turning it off right before branch could definitely be a good way to get lab testers that test on Canary be aware of this. At the same time, the release managers may not be excited about it, because it reduces Canary's testing relevance. Maybe we can settle o

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Implement & Ship: User-Agent Reduction Phase 6 (deviceModel and androidVersion reduction in Android)

Resolving the issues associated with automated testing prior to commencement of deployment and 14th February should be dependency. See this link. 1212793 - Client hints not sent in headless chrome - chromium The lack of functional

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: WebSQL in non-secure contexts

Hey Randy, On Tue, Jan 31, 2023 at 10:51 PM Randy Lauen wrote: > Speaking of nontrivial examples, I have a Chrome extension that relies > heavily on WebSQL. On my desktop, the WebSQL database for my extension is > almost 400 MB. I know some users have a database over 1 GB. I'm very > excited abo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: WebRTC's RTCStats of type "track" and "stream".

Ping. Does my proposal to do enabled-by-default (so that testing environments don't miss this again) prior to having ramped this up to 100% make sense or is that considered bad practise? Current status is ENABLED_BY_DEFAULT in M111 (currently Canary), which would need to be reverted if we either

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Add optional submitter parameter to FormData constructor

LGTM3 Glad to see you're pushing the platform towards where you need it to be. More of that please!! :D On Monday, January 30, 2023 at 10:27:18 PM UTC+1 jo...@netflix.com wrote: > Ok FYI issue filed: https://github.com/w3ctag/design-reviews/issues/812 > > Jon > > On Monday, January 30, 2023 at

[blink-dev] Re: Request to Review Proposal: fetch keepalive infra migration

+blink-dev +loading-dev for more visibility. On Wed, Feb 1, 2023 at 3:28 PM Ming-Ying Chung wrote: > Hi blink-network-dev team and platform-architecture-dev team, > > *Context* > We are planning an infra migration for fetch keepalive requests. The > current implementation suffers from delaying

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: animation-composition property

LGTM1. Thanks for catching us up here! On Thursday, January 26, 2023 at 2:23:24 PM UTC+1 Daniil Sakhapov wrote: Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org ExplainerAlready works as part of Web Animations API, adding the CSS version now. Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/csswg-drafts/css-animations-2/

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

On Wed, Feb 01, 2023 at 12:27:08AM -0800, obr...@igalia.com wrote: > For example, https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/5745 resolved to > accept the selector & everywhere, defaulting it to :scope. But from a quick > test it seems that querySelector and querySelectorAll just return null or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Nesting

Sorry for the delay, I will try to answer the various points raised: > Thanks for raising that there may be some spec changes that don't match the current implementation. Can you list which issues you think need to be resolved? There are already 3 listed upthread, and I agree that anything that