Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

LGTM1 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:26 PM Tommy Steimel wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:43 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:55:09 AM UTC+2 chri...@google.com wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Please update your chromestatus entry to trigger the other 5 review >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Zstd Content-Encoding

Hi Lee, I'm glad you were able to patch the error ahead of a more general rollout! Regarding your second point, there's two ways you can explicitly turn on the feature: 1. If there's a "Flag name on chrome://flags" in the Intent to Experiment, you can manually turn on the feature by navigating

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:51 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:34:21 AM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote: > > Hi, > > While Alex's concerns are totally valid to consider from a feature design > perspective, I think they are better to be discussed on the WHATWG issues > for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:43 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:55:09 AM UTC+2 chri...@google.com wrote: > > Hi, > > Please update your chromestatus entry to trigger the other 5 review > categories for this intent. I think it's probably the case that you ended > up with

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

For the 3 review categories in chromestatus (security, privacy, and debuggability), I have clicked on request review but have not found a way to post comments from the UI. For security and privacy, we have a self-review at:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

We would like to start running this experiment from 120 through 123 inclusive, but may have to delay start to 121 running through 124. On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 7:54:51 AM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote: > Please also fill out the 3 other review categories (security, privacy, >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

Chris, is there any way to grant Corentin edit access to the Chromestatus entry? Ryan's OOO the rest of this week and we'd like to progress this before then. Thanks. On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:44 AM Corentin Wallez wrote: > Thank you for the guidance. I commented on each of these, but >

[blink-dev] We’re just 1 week away from BlinkOn 18!

bcc: blink-dev@ and BlinkOn 18 attendees Hi all, We’re just days away from BlinkOn 18! With one week remaining, there are just a few housekeeping items to share. If you’re still needing to register to attend virtually, do so here

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Prototype: Third-Party Cookie Phaseout

Please see this blog post discussing how sites can prepare for third-party cookie phaseout: https://developer.chrome.com/blog/cookie-countdown-2023oct/ In particular, see this note regarding a deprecation trial:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

Thank you for the guidance. I commented on each of these, but unfortunately don't have edit rights on the feature status so I can't mark the reviews as started. On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:20 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Hi Corentin, > > The reviews I'm talking about are the "chips" UI in your

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

Thank you all! On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:07 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM3 that is :) > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:55 AM Alex Russell > wrote: > >> Given that the TAG didn't respond in two weeks, I'm going to LGTM1 >> >> On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 10:50:14 PM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Zstd Content-Encoding

This actually triggered a small internal incident at Datadog on a private API that wasn't set-up to handle Zstandard encoding properly. So two things: 1. Firstly, thanks for bringing this this our attention! We were able to patch the error ahead of a more general roll-out to public users. 2.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

Hi Corentin, The reviews I'm talking about are the "chips" UI in your chromestatus entry . Screenshot below. Once the reviews have begun the gray chips will turn blue or green. This is a recent change to chromestatus, see here

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

You mention 5 reviews, there's Security / Privacy / TAG but I'm not sure what the others are. We believe that the three reviews we know of are not applicable both because this feature doesn't impact them, and because any review would be a rehash of parts of the reviews for the original WebGPU

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

Great thank you! On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 9:32 AM Nan Lin wrote: > Thanks Chris. > > I kicked off those reviews in chromestatus, and will ping this thread when > those reviews are complete. > > Thanks, > Nan > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> Please fill out the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

Thanks Chris. I kicked off those reviews in chromestatus, and will ping this thread when those reviews are complete. Thanks, Nan On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Please fill out the 5 other review categories (security, privacy, etc) in > chromestatus. Those will need

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

LGTM to experiment in 120 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 6:11 PM Patrick Meenan wrote: > Sorry, forgot to mention the milestone - 120 for running the experiment. > The code is in place to run the experiment as of 119 but since it hasn't > run enabled in dev channel and 119 is in Beta now, the plan is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

Sorry, forgot to mention the milestone - 120 for running the experiment. The code is in place to run the experiment as of 119 but since it hasn't run enabled in dev channel and 119 is in Beta now, the plan is to experiment in 120. On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:04 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > One last

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

LGTM3 that is :) On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 8:55 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Given that the TAG didn't respond in two weeks, I'm going to LGTM1 > > On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 10:50:14 PM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:27 PM Traian Captan >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Yoav, >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:04 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > > So this will be sent in both H2 and H3? > Yes. As it stands right now, the Priority header will be sent in all cases where we prioritize (and already send frame-level priorities) on multiplexed connections (HTTP/2 and HTTP/3). The benefit

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

Given that the TAG didn't respond in two weeks, I'm going to LGTM1 On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 10:50:14 PM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:27 PM Traian Captan > wrote: > >> Hi Yoav, >> >> I don't know of Gecko's and WebKit's concrete implementation plans for >>

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

LGTM2 On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 7:50:14 AM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:27 PM Traian Captan > wrote: > >> Hi Yoav, >> >> I don't know of Gecko's and WebKit's concrete implementation plans for >> Intersection Observer Scroll Margin. >> However, based on their

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:34:21 AM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote: Hi, While Alex's concerns are totally valid to consider from a feature design perspective, I think they are better to be discussed on the WHATWG issues for this feature. I chatted offline with Alex and he agreed about

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:36 AM 'Henrik Boström' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087376775053312 > > On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:09:32 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

LGTM3 On 10/11/23 10:45 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:32 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:41:48 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks Jason! And yes, Cammie (and team), please request approval bits in

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

One last question: what milestones are you planning to run this experiment on? On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 7:02:51 PM UTC+2 Patrick Meenan wrote: On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:18 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: Can you briefly describe what the header parts are good for, and how would developers use

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

Hi Chris, I don't see the other review categories (security, privacy, etc) in the Prepare to Ship stage in chromestatus. How shall I edit and request review for those? Thanks. Best, Nan On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 10:53 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Please fill out the 5 other review categories

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

Please also fill out the 3 other review categories (security, privacy, debuggability) in chromestatus. On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:13 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi there, > > Could you clarify which milestones you would like to run the experiment on? > > thanks, > Mike > On 10/11/23 6:05 AM, 'Lu

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

Please fill out the 5 other review categories (security, privacy, etc) in chromestatus. Those will need to be started before the API owners can review. On Fri, Oct 6, 2023 at 5:46 AM Nan Lin wrote: > Contact emails > > lin...@chromium.org, johni...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > Attribution

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

Please fill out the 5 other review categories (security, privacy, etc) in chromestatus. Those will need to be started before the API owners can review. On Thu, Oct 5, 2023 at 1:17 PM Ryan Harrison wrote: > +cc cwallez, since he is the WebGPU lead, and can respond authoritatively > if I am OOO >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:44 AM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2023-10-11 16:36, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > LGTM1 > > Thanks for the compat analysis! :) > > On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 3:28:03 AM UTC+2 David Baron wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:30 AM Yoav Weiss

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

I don't normally weigh in on these but I just wanted to say that I think this one is pretty unique for a whole bunch of reasons and it's not just an example of bikeshedding after shipping by a specific vendor or something. It's more than that. As much as I think this is important, and wanted

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

LGTM2 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:32 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:41:48 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > >> Thanks Jason! >> >> And yes, Cammie (and team), please request approval bits in Chromestatus >> - API OWNERs will wait on that (not approvals, just

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2023-10-11 16:36, Yoav Weiss wrote: LGTM1 Thanks for the compat analysis! :) On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 3:28:03 AM UTC+2 David Baron wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:30 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:04 PM David Baron

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:55:09 AM UTC+2 chri...@google.com wrote: Hi, Please update your chromestatus entry to trigger the other 5 review categories for this intent. I think it's probably the case that you ended up with the wrong feature category and need to update it, sorry for any

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private State Tokens API

(sending as a late FYI update as we discovered we never updated the blink-dev thread post ramp-up) Private State Tokens have been enabled for 100% of Chrome 114+ users. The feature is also enabled by default on the Chromium tip-of-tree as of July, which corresponds to the Chrome 117 release. On

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:08:02 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/11/23 7:06 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > LGTM1 > > (Privacy and Security steps in Chromestatus are not completed but they are > unlikely to affect anything) > > /Daniel > On 2023-10-04 12:23, Rune

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023, 7:07 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/11/23 7:06 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > LGTM1 > > (Privacy and Security steps in Chromestatus are not completed but they are > unlikely to affect anything) > > /Daniel > On 2023-10-04 12:23, Rune Lillesveen wrote: > > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM3 once the PR lands :) On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:06:35 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2, same condition. > On 10/11/23 7:16 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) > > Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining > possible

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

https://chromestatus.com/feature/5087376775053312 On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:09:32 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various > review gate bits? > On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: > > LGTM2 > On 10/11/23 8:49 AM,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

LGTM1 Thanks for the compat analysis! :) On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 3:28:03 AM UTC+2 David Baron wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:30 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:04 PM David Baron wrote: >> >>> Summary >>> >>> This feature adds the ability to construct

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

LGTM1 On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:41:48 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks Jason! > > And yes, Cammie (and team), please request approval bits in Chromestatus - > API OWNERs will wait on that (not approvals, just beginning the process for > each) before approving. > > thanks, > Mike > On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

Hi there, Could you clarify which milestones you would like to run the experiment on? thanks, Mike On 10/11/23 6:05 AM, 'Lu Huang' via blink-dev wrote: Contact emails lu...@microsoft.com, luigo...@microsoft.com, alancut...@chromium.org Explainer

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

Also, could you please create a chromestatus entry and request the various review gate bits? On 10/11/23 10:08 AM, Mike Taylor wrote: LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM2 On 10/11/23 8:49 AM, Philip Jägenstedt wrote: LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: *Contant emails:* h...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

LGTM2 On 10/11/23 7:06 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 (Privacy and Security steps in Chromestatus are not completed but they are unlikely to affect anything) /Daniel On 2023-10-04 12:23, Rune Lillesveen wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:08 AM Rune Lillesveen wrote:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM2, same condition. On 10/11/23 7:16 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining possible showstoppers. I do find it both amusing and a bit Kafkaesque that the web community seems to have a process

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

FWIW we don't ship this (outside of the nightly channel), so not sure where the gecko status is coming from, but it's not accurate. (Not that I object to this change tho) -- Emilio On 10/4/23 11:08, Rune Lillesveen wrote: Contact emails futh...@chromium.org

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: MediaStreamTrack Stats

LGTM1, this is a minor addition to an existing API, was discussed in the WG at TPAC, and has a positive standards position from Mozilla. On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 4:16 PM Henrik Boström wrote: > *Contant emails:* > h...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org > > *Explainer:* > This is a small addition to

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

I see that various mandatory steps in chromestatus (privacy,security,enterprise,debuggability,testing) seems to be unstarted. It is possible they were made mandatory after you create the entry, but it would be good if you could get them started now at least. Also, it's unfortunate that TAG

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining possible showstoppers. I do find it both amusing and a bit Kafkaesque that the web community seems to have a process where the spec waits for implementers and implementers (at least us)

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

LGTM1 (Privacy and Security steps in Chromestatus are not completed but they are unlikely to affect anything) /Daniel On 2023-10-04 12:23, Rune Lillesveen wrote: On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:08 AM Rune Lillesveen wrote: Contact emails futh...@chromium.org,

[blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Web app scope extensions

Contact emails lu...@microsoft.com, luigo...@microsoft.com, alancut...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/manifest-incubations/blob/gh-pages/scope_extensions-explainer.md Specification None Design docs