Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Vladimir Levin!

Congrats!! :) On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:46 PM Ken Russell wrote: > Congratulations Vlad! > > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:43 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Congrats Vlad! >> On 5/15/24 12:22 PM, danakj wrote: >> >> Congrats, Vlad :) >> >> On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:19 PM Chris Harrelson >> wrote

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Tabbed web apps

To follow up, there's a nice shout out at Google I/O about this feature and also mentions that Figma is trying it: https://youtu.be/KFeuEMAaKfM?si=pr71c4hfxhI5RbT0&t=1039 On Sun, May 12, 2024 at 6:08 PM Matt Giuca wrote: > Thanks everyone. This is now enabled on ToT in 126. > > On Fri, 10 May 2

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate Mutation Events

I recall that some of this usage was feature detected: if mutation events are supported, use them; otherwise, use something else. Unfortunately, that makes it difficult to estimate the expected number of breakages. I agree though that it would be nice to understand the type of usage that still exis

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Web Translation API

On Thu, May 16, 2024 at 1:14 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Ah, thanks. I'd missed that. > > I don't see any considered alternatives in that doc. > They're in the section titled "Alternatives considered and under consideration"

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate Mutation Events

On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:03 PM Mason Freed wrote: > Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/uievents/#legacy-event-types > > Summary > > Mutation Events, including `DOMSubtreeModified`, `DOMNodeInserted`, > `DOMNodeRemoved`, `DOMNodeRemovedFromD

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Automatic Fullscreen Content Setting

LGTM as an IWA OWNER (3x LGTM from Blink API OWNERS are still required according to the IWA-specific API launch process ). Thank you for working with the IWA and Security reviewers to figure out the right restrictions to prevent

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Automatic Fullscreen Content Setting

Our team can commit to adding Permissions API query integration, with the requisite approvals. That would provide feature detection, and also clarify requestFullscreen method steps in the spec. I'm requesting approval to ship the feature in its current state, given our commitment to follow up. Th

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Vladimir Levin!

Congratulations Vlad! On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 10:43 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Congrats Vlad! > On 5/15/24 12:22 PM, danakj wrote: > > Congrats, Vlad :) > > On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:19 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> I'd like to welcome Vlad as our newest API owner. He is a long-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Support Video Chapter in MediaMetadata

Thanks Domenic and Mike for the reply! I see. It looks like we have an LGTM on the Mozilla review . Could we please add some reviewers for the TAG review as well? If not, I'm happy to ping this thread again in two weeks :] Best, Jiaming

[blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Deprecate Mutation Events

Contact emailsmas...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/uievents/#legacy-event-types Summary Mutation Events, including `DOMSubtreeModified`, `DOMNodeInserted`, `DOMNodeRemoved`, `DOMNodeRemovedFromDocument`, `DOMNodeInsertedIntoDocument`, and `DOMCharacterDataModifie

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Vladimir Levin!

Congrats Vlad! On 5/15/24 12:22 PM, danakj wrote: Congrats, Vlad :) On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:19 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: Hi all, I'd like to welcome Vlad as our newest API owner. He is a long-time member of the Blink community that many of you know well, and has quite a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Conversion to RGB in VideoFrame.copyTo()

LGTM3 On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 6:02 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > /Daniel > On 2024-05-15 07:13, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > LGTM1. > > I have a small non-blocking request: update your Chrome Status entry to > avoid using ClassName.staticMethod() syntax for what appears to be an > instance

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Automatic Fullscreen Content Setting

No, this content setting does not have Permissions API integration at this time. That seems like a great future improvement, especially if user control of the setting is extended to more contexts. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:37 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Will the status of the permission be reflecte

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

>From my understanding, we need to wait for the PointerEvents spec V3 to be published before the PR can be merged; this change is slated for the 4th iteration of the spec. On Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 9:02:52 AM UTC-7 Chris Harrelson wrote: > Hi, > > I see the spec PR is still pending. Is ther

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Automatic Fullscreen Content Setting

Will the status of the permission be reflected in the Permissions API? I see Permissions Policy integration, but not the Permissions API reflection that I'd expect. Best, Alex On Tuesday, May 14, 2024 at 3:54:24 PM UTC-7 Mike Wasserman wrote: > Thanks! I pinged the PR, and hope for some feedb

Re: [blink-dev] New API owner: Vladimir Levin!

Congrats, Vlad :) On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 12:19 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > Hi all, > > I'd like to welcome Vlad as our newest API owner. He is a long-time member > of the Blink community that many of you know well, and has quite a bit of > experience in graphics, Blink rendering and standards.

[blink-dev] New API owner: Vladimir Levin!

Hi all, I'd like to welcome Vlad as our newest API owner. He is a long-time member of the Blink community that many of you know well, and has quite a bit of experience in graphics, Blink rendering and standards. Welcome Vlad, and congratulations! -- You received this message because you are sub

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Web Translation API

Ah, thanks. I'd missed that. I don't see any considered alternatives in that doc. The streaming return value seems like it should, at a minimum, cause us to want to update the setHTML and innerHTML/innerText systems to handle stream assignments. Also, do streamed translations ever backtrack? E.g.,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Stop modifying author-defined selection colors

LGTM3 On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 9:08 AM Alex Russell wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 8:55:34 AM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> LGTM1 >> >> On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 1:41:40 AM UTC+2 Stephen Chenney wrote: >> >>> Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org >>> >>> ExplainerNone >>> >>> Spe

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Stop modifying author-defined selection colors

LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 8:55:34 AM UTC-7 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM1 > > On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 1:41:40 AM UTC+2 Stephen Chenney wrote: > >> Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/#highlight-selectors >> >> Summ

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

Hi, I see the spec PR is still pending. Is there a reason it can't land before shipping? On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 12:23 PM 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Done! I've updated the explainer as well as the links in the TAG review. > > On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 8:51:

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Conversion to RGB in VideoFrame.copyTo()

LGTM2 /Daniel On 2024-05-15 07:13, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM1. I have a small non-blocking request: update your Chrome Status entry to avoid using ClassName.staticMethod() syntax for what appears to be an instance method. (See e.g. this related discussion

Re: [blink-dev] Request for Deprecation Trial: Media Previews opt-out

Can you expand on how (if) this is different from the past intent with a similar title? On Monday, May 13, 2024 at 7:21:48 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > FWIW, a deprecation tr

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Stop modifying author-defined selection colors

LGTM1 On Thursday, May 9, 2024 at 1:41:40 AM UTC+2 Stephen Chenney wrote: > Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-pseudo-4/#highlight-selectors > > SummaryChromium currently checks all selection highlight colors against > the text color

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: Element Capture

LGTM3 On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 8:40 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM2 > > On Tue, May 14, 2024 at 11:36 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> OK - thanks for the clarification. I would ask that you get in touch with >> every registered origin - expiring the experiment early may be surprising. >> >> LGTM1

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Find-in-page highlight pseudos

I appreciate that someone is working on this because Chromium has atrociously bad search hit highlights. That said, I wonder if it would be better fixing Chromium than the web. There are a lot of web pages out and this could at best help those with very active ongoing development. /Daniel On

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC encoded transform - Constructor with custom Metadata (originally Modify Metadata functions)

LGTM3 /Daniel On 2024-05-15 15:47, Guido Urdaneta wrote: I just opened access to the doc. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:57 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: The document seems to be an internal one. Is there anything you can share publicly? /Daniel On 2024-05-15 07:34, Domenic Denicola w

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC encoded transform - Constructor with custom Metadata (originally Modify Metadata functions)

I just opened access to the doc. On Wed, May 15, 2024 at 2:57 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > The document seems to be an internal one. Is there anything you can share > publicly? > > /Daniel > On 2024-05-15 07:34, Domenic Denicola wrote: > > LGTM2 > > On Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 4:47:32 AM UTC+9 M

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebRTC encoded transform - Constructor with custom Metadata (originally Modify Metadata functions)

The document seems to be an internal one. Is there anything you can share publicly? /Daniel On 2024-05-15 07:34, Domenic Denicola wrote: LGTM2 On Wednesday, May 15, 2024 at 4:47:32 AM UTC+9 Mike Taylor wrote: Thanks for the doc. It sounds like the design evolved during the OT based o

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Protected Audience: reporting timeouts & multiple-bids

On Monday, May 6, 2024 at 10:03:16 PM UTC+2 Paul Jensen wrote: Contact emails pauljen...@chromium.org Explainer Protected Audience reporting timeouts: https://github.com/WICG/ turtledove/pull/1101 Protected Audience multiple-bids: https://github.com/WICG/ turtledove/pull/1048 Specificatio