Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

Supporting consistent IDs for supported pens sounds great. Sahir & Ben: wondering why a new deviceId field seems more logical now against the original proposal of repurposing the pointerId field? Is it because of the compat concern you raised in w3c/pointerevents/issues/353

[blink-dev] Re: PSA: Simultaneous touch-drag and context-menu is getting enabled on Android 100+

The Android team is apparently seeing reports like yours. Please comment on this bug about your experience. On Wed, Jun 29, 2022 at 4:22 AM Creature Feature wrote: > Hello, I have recently became aware of this and I am having a slight issue > - when I am trying to

[blink-dev] PSA: Simultaneous touch-drag and context-menu is getting enabled on Android 100+

On Android we are soon enabling touch-dragging following a long-press, which could subtly affect custom context-menu closing behavior in certain websites. We are not exposing any events that didn't exist before but we are changing when these events may fire on some devices/content. This can

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Fullscreen Capability Delegation

Hi Mike: Sorry for the delay due to vacation etc! Below are my answers to your queries. Note that we are still asking for M103, so we will be prompt now :) > Does this only work for standard requestFullscreen, or will it work for webkitRequestFullscreen as well? This covers all forms: we are

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Capability Delegation with Payment Request

Looks like we missed asking for the official position of Webkit. Just sent the request . On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 12:02 PM Chris Harrelson wrote: > > > On Fri, Jan 28, 2022 at 9:01 AM Stephen Mcgruer > wrote: > >> > Am I

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Calling PaymentRequest.show without user activation

On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 11:16 AM Chris Harrelson wrote: > LGTM2 for the extension to 102, but comments below. It would be very good > to make progress on landing additional spec pieces. > > On Tue, Feb 15, 2022 at 8:09 AM 'Mustaq Ahmed' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chromium.

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Calling PaymentRequest.show without user activation

I think [1] would be useful for developers but I see two blockers here: first we need to land the Capability Delegation patch in HTML spec as a "reference point" for this idea, then the PR for

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Capability Delegation with Payment Request

Hi Mike: Appreciate your feedback. My answers are inline. Mustaq On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 6:03 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > Hi Mustaq, > > On 1/25/22 4:45 PM, Mustaq Ahmed wrote: > > Contact emails > > mus...@chromium.org, smcgr...@chromium.org > Explainer > >

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Capability Delegation with Payment Request

Thanks Yoav, my answers to your questions are inline below. Mustaq On Wed, Jan 26, 2022 at 10:42 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > Thanks for pushing this useful feature! > > On Tuesday, January 25, 2022 at 10:46:12 PM UTC+1 Mustaq Ahmed wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> mus...@chromium.org,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Capability Delegation

Thanks for your feedback, Jun. That's an important point that calls for clarification: This is spec is probably written with the assumption that Permission > Delegation > > is implemented (or