On Tue, Jun 14, 2022 at 7:02 PM Ari Chivukula wrote:
> Gecko: Neutral
I don't think I should claim to speak for Gecko anymore, but that
comment of mine was not neutral. We keep adding mutable policies (and
I include one-off no policy -> policy transitions in this) on the
basis that it makes
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 9:22 PM Vivek Sekhar wrote:
>> This particular technique has been discussed before, but there's a
>> flaw which wasn't mentioned in this email. The idea assumes that all
>> end users can access the same websites and also that all end users
>> visit similar websites.
On Tue, Apr 26, 2022 at 1:59 PM Daisuke Enomoto wrote:
> Explainer
>
> https://docs.google.com/document/d/1pvaMg7J5beBXD7trzHJH_MDULc_wRHLx40MFYAmjknE/edit
This document isn't public.
This particular technique has been discussed before, but there's a
flaw which wasn't mentioned in this email.
On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 8:16 PM Etienne Pierre-doray
wrote:
> As an example, this change breaks the assumption that setTimeout(0) causes
> micro tasks to run in at least one case in Chrome tests (crbug.com/1302309).
This is something you plan to fix, right? setTimeout no longer
adhering to task
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 11:54 PM Kenichi Ishibashi wrote:
> We plan to start working on the spec issue in this quarter.
That's great to hear, appreciate the update!
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"blink-dev" group.
To unsubscribe from this group
On Thu, Oct 7, 2021 at 8:39 AM Kenichi Ishibashi wrote:
> Specification
>
> https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc8297
When do you expect to make progress on
https://github.com/whatwg/fetch/issues/1225? The RFC doesn't fully
define this feature.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed
On Tue, Oct 19, 2021 at 5:57 PM Fernando Serboncini wrote:
> Regarding adding the mitigation to the spec, we didn't do it as it does look
> more like an implementation detail (even in our case, we discussed multiple
> potential solutions that were satisfactory). I think sticking this to spec
>
On Fri, Oct 1, 2021 at 12:35 PM Yoav Weiss wrote:
> Thanks Anne and Thomas for the cross-browser context.
>
> Anupam - looking at the issue Anne posted, it seems Firefox explicitly did
> not implement this.
> I think it'd be interesting to get their opinions as to why, and whether we
> should
On Wed, Sep 29, 2021 at 7:31 PM 'Anupam Snigdha' via blink-dev
wrote:
> The ClipboardItem [...] This API has been standardized and implemented in
> Chromium & Safari.
I wouldn't call it standardized. Yes, the specification contains some
IDL, but nowhere is it defined what the associated
On Fri, Aug 13, 2021 at 7:04 PM 'Ionel Popescu' via blink-dev
wrote:
> https://wicg.github.io/eyedropper-api/
It seems some security issues were opened against this document post
LGTMs. And after these issues were raised there hasn't been a lot of
activity on the repository which makes me wonder
10 matches
Mail list logo
