Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Anchor Positioning

2024-05-02 Thread Florian Rivoal
On 2024/05/03 5:43, Mason Freed wrote: I stand by what I said - we will definitely be open to well-justified changes after we ship! More inline below. Despite the best intents, the "well-justified" part of this is going to be a very quickly raising bar. The same intent was declared [1]

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS headline balancing

2023-03-21 Thread Florian Rivoal
I am very supportive of this feature being worked on, but I am very puzzled by Google's intent to ship something that is different from the spec. It doesn't seem that you have expressed any disagreement with what the spec says, or asked for it to be changed. If you think the spec's design is

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS "overflow" media features

2023-03-03 Thread Florian Rivoal
> On 4Mar 2023, at 5:59, Alex Russell wrote: > > Our process does not pay much mind to arbitrary standards gates when others > have not already shipped. If WebKit had (has?) implemented, that would > shortcut our analysis, otherwise, it's still worth asking. The point is not about what the

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Initial Letters

2023-01-26 Thread Florian Rivoal
Sorry for the very late feedback. > On 22Nov 2022, at 17:19, Yoshifumi Inoue wrote: > > > Here is Web Developers demand, I was put into the wrong box in the tool. > It’s implemented only in Safari, but the usage is high. > * 40.2% usage ratio according to CSS2021 Usage Overview >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Custom Highlight API

2021-08-18 Thread Florian Rivoal
> On Aug 19, 2021, at 1:15, Delan Azabani wrote: > > I’m also excited to see this feature ship, as it’s pretty relevant to our > work at Igalia, but I feel I must share and expand on Florian’s concerns > about our current behaviour. > > On Wednesday, August 18, 2021 at 12:27:04 AM UTC+8