Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: MessagePort.onclose

Also, can you tick the review boxes in your Chrome status entry to kick off security, privacy and other reviews? On Wed, Nov 29, 2023 at 6:22 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > I ran into a Chromium-internal case where having a `close` signal would've > helped me reduce complexity significan

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype and Ship: MessagePort.onclose

I ran into a Chromium-internal case where having a `close` signal would've helped me reduce complexity significantly. So I'm very excited about this work. I also believe there's an equivalent mechanism in Electron. Might be worthwhile

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: VideoEncoderConfig.contentHint

LGTM2 On Tue, Nov 28, 2023 at 7:50 AM Rick Byers wrote: > All the other gates are now approved. I see there's a larger TAG review > open which includes > this feature, but it sounds like this generic (not codec-specific) feature > is the dire

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Storage Buckets API

hese hurdles. > > We hope that both sides of the risk/reward equation improve: adoption > risks come down as other vendors implement, and we're able to keep adding > useful functionality that justifies the investment to migrate. > > -- Evan Stade > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 202

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU default entry points to shader modules

LGTM3 On Saturday, November 25, 2023 at 7:08:21 PM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 11/24/23 8:53 AM, Rick Byers wrote: > > Thanks, good enough for me! LGTM1 > > On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 8:32 AM François Beaufort > wrote: > >> >> >> On Fri, Nov 24, 2023 at 1:46 AM Rick Byers wrote: >> >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-palette property animation

LGTM1 assuming there aren't any surprises on that front. Thanks!! On Thu, Nov 23, 2023 at 2:33 PM Dominik Röttsches wrote: > Hi Yoav, > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:46 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646 >&

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document rules, response header, eagerness

LGTM1 These all seem like useful improvements! :) On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 8:14 PM Jeremy Roman wrote: > > > On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 11:10 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Jeremy Roman >> wrote: >> >>> No

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS font-palette property animation

https://github.com/w3c/csswg-drafts/issues/8922#issuecomment-1720930646 indicates that some parts of this were resolved and other parts are still to be bikeshedded. Can you expand on that? What's the issue around color space interpolation? On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 4:02:34 PM UTC+1 moo..

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: View Transitions: transition types

LGTM1 On Thursday, November 9, 2023 at 7:05:57 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: On Thu, Nov 9, 2023, 12:54 Mike Taylor wrote: On 11/8/23 3:53 PM, Vladimir Levin wrote: Contact emails vmp...@chromium.org, nrosent...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/vmpstr/web-proposals/blob/main/ expl

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Document rules, response header, eagerness

On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:33 AM Jeremy Roman wrote: > Note: This intent email spans three Chromestatus entries for different > sub-features that we experimented with together and would like permission > to ship together in M121. > > Contact emailsjbro...@chromium.org, adith...@chromium.org, > is

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Storage Buckets API

On Tuesday, November 14, 2023 at 9:38:55 PM UTC+1 Evan Stade wrote: Contact emails est...@chromium.org, a...@chromium.org, ajayrahate...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/WICG/storage-buckets/blob/main/explainer.md Specification https://wicg.github.io/storage-buckets Summary Stora

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS supports() condition for @import

LGTM1 While I'm not excited about @import in general and think no one should use it, this restricts it in potentially useful ways. On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 3:28:48 PM UTC+1 Daniil Sakhapov wrote: > Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org > > Specificationhttps://www.w3.org/TR/css-cascade-

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Document picture-in-picture: require user gesture for resize APIs

On Friday, November 17, 2023 at 8:47:34 PM UTC+1 Tommy Steimel wrote: Contact emailsstei...@chromium.org, liber...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://github.com/WICG/document-picture-in-picture/pull/104 Summary This adds a user gesture requirement for the resizeBy() and resizeTo

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Lazy load scroll margin

Thanks, that sounds like a strict improvement. On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 6:25 AM Traian Captan wrote: > Yes, that's correct. > > > On Tue, Nov 21, 2023 at 9:18 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> Do I understand correctly that currently lazy-loaded images in CSS >> scroll

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Lazy load scroll margin

Do I understand correctly that currently lazy-loaded images in CSS scrollers have suboptimal behavior and this would improve that without potentially harming other cases? On Wed, Nov 22, 2023 at 1:55 AM Traian Captan wrote: > Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specification

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: fetchLater API

trial doesn't require any approvals. Please revive this thread when you're ready to request an OT. > > Also, can you kick off the other review checks in your chromestatus entry? > > Yes, we have kicked off Security and Privacy reviews. > > > On Thu, Nov 16, 2023 at 12:42

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience - Do Not Disable Cookie Setting in ReportEvent until 3PCD (Chrome - 120)

away at the point of third-party cookie > deprecation. We have also documented > <https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/884> that these cookies will > only be sent with automatic beacons when third-party cookies are enabled. > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 4:15 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: &

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience - Do Not Disable Cookie Setting in ReportEvent until 3PCD (Chrome - 120)

On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 10:23 PM 'Garrett Tanzer' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > They should all be requested now. > > Thanks > > On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 3:45 PM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> Hi Garrett, >> >> Would you mind requesting each of the review gates in the chromestatus >>

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

for me. And it will still be controllable by a > finch flag. > > LGTM1 dependent on there being a published document outlining the options > for web developers (i.e. the document you are already working on). > > /Daniel > On 2023-11-10 09:45, Fergal Daly wrote: > > On Fr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: Interoperable Pointer and Mouse boundary events after DOM changes

LGTM1 I agree that the compat risk here seems low, and the interop win more than makes up for it. On Monday, November 13, 2023 at 4:04:02 PM UTC+1 Mustaq Ahmed wrote: > Hi Chris: > > The other 5 review categories are now green, the last one was marked a few > hours ago. > > Please let me know

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: fetchLater API

Also, can you kick off the other review checks in your chromestatus entry? On Wednesday, November 15, 2023 at 10:40:08 AM UTC+1 Yoav Weiss wrote: > What milestones do you want to run the experiment in? > > On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 8:10 AM Jesugbamigbe Daniel Fadipe < > jdanielf

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: fetchLater API

What milestones do you want to run the experiment in? On Wed, Nov 15, 2023 at 8:10 AM Jesugbamigbe Daniel Fadipe < jdanielfad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Many thanks, > > J Daniel Fadipe > 07412666868 > > > On Wed, 15 Nov 2023 at 08:09, Ming-Ying Chung wrote: > >> Contact emailsm...@chromium.org, d

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: MediaStreamTrack Stats (Audio)

On Mon, Nov 13, 2023 at 4:04 PM Henrik Boström wrote: > Contact emails > h...@chromium.org, o...@chromium.org, h...@chromium.org > > Specification > > https://w3c.github.io/mediacapture-extensions/#the-mediastreamtrackaudiostats-interface > > Summary > > The `track.stats` API allows an applicatio

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: Honoring Android OS-Level bold text setting

On Tue, Nov 14, 2023 at 2:13 AM 'Mark Schillaci' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emailsmschill...@google.com > > Explainer > https://docs.google.com/document/d/12K06qDhiJo9inhDIfj3rOCY54xQjgUpv2Y5gaIhjCqE/edit?usp=sharing&resourcekey=0-ZNiuGN9gAy_nXte_11_G7A > Can you ple

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Deprecate & Remove: Third-Party Cookies

LGTM1 I cannot imagine a more thorough and thoughtful approach than the one the Privacy Sandbox team has taken to tackle this significant change to the web's privacy model while minimizing breakage and providing replacement APIs. Thanks for pushing this important work through!! On Mon, Nov 13, 20

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: No-Vary-Search support in navigation prefetch cache

re that won't be a hurdle this feature would run into further down that same road. On Fri, Nov 10, 2023 at 9:44 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > 2023年11月10日(金) 17:14 Yoav Weiss : > >> >> >> On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 2:46 AM Domenic Denicola >> wrot

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

rity issues. > > On Friday, October 13, 2023 at 7:14:46 AM UTC-7 vmp...@chromium.org wrote: > > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 12:00 AM 'Fergal Daly' via blink-dev < > blin...@chromium.org> wrote: > > On Thu, 12 Oct 2023 at 23:05, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: No-Vary-Search support in navigation prefetch cache

On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 2:46 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > On Thu, Nov 9, 2023 at 12:44 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> Thanks for working on this, as I'm enthusiastically supportive of >> tackling this use case! >> >> One thing I wish y'all have

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: checkVisibility: contentVisibilityAuto, opacityProperty, and visibilityProperty

LGTM1 On Monday, November 6, 2023 at 9:21:34 PM UTC+1 Vladimir Levin wrote: > Contact emailsvmp...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > > Specification > https://drafts.csswg.org/cssom-view/#dom-element-checkvisibility > > Summary > > This feature adds three more values to the checkVisibility ( > htt

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audience clearOriginJoinedAdInterestGroups() & interest group limit changes & kAnonStatus

LGTM1 On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 8:11:02 PM UTC+1 or...@google.com wrote: > Sorry for the delay in response. All of the PRs have since landed. > > Regarding your question on the interest group limit changes, these limits > are intended to be guardrails against exceptional behavior, and no

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: No-Vary-Search support in navigation prefetch cache

Thanks for working on this, as I'm enthusiastically supportive of tackling this use case! One thing I wish y'all have done, and that I haven't seen any evidence of (but please correct me if I'm wrong) is discuss this design with the HTTPWG at the IETF. That is feedback that I believe you got at TP

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Highlight Inheritance

gt; >> >> >> On Wed, Nov 1, 2023 at 11:11 AM Stephen Chenney >> wrote: >> >>> Answers inline. Regarding Ander's comment on the current base_feature >>> setting: I'll fix that. >>> >>> Cheers, >>> Stephen. >&g

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS spelling and grammar features

LGTM3 On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 4:24 PM Daniel Bratell wrote: > LGTM2 > > This one could use a ping in the mozilla standards position issue like > that other one. > > /Daniel > On 2023-11-07 01:58, Mike Taylor wrote: > > Thanks - LGTM1 > On 11/6/23 7:27 PM, Stephen Chenney wrote: > > Thanks Mike. >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebCodecs support for enabling AV1 screen content coding tools

LGTM1 - seems like a simple and useful addition to the API surface. On Wednesday, November 1, 2023 at 3:07:22 PM UTC+1 philipp...@googlemail.com wrote: > Am Mi., 25. Okt. 2023 um 18:40 Uhr schrieb Mike Taylor < > miketa...@chromium.org>: > >> On 10/20/23 2:27 PM, 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (further gating for trigger verbose debug reports)

LGTM2 On Tuesday, November 7, 2023 at 2:44:47 AM UTC+1 Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks Akash. > > LGTM1 % sending out an email to the > attribution-reporting-api-...@chromium.org group. > On 11/6/23 4:52 PM, Akash Nadan wrote: > > Hi Mike, > > I've spot checked some popular publisher sites, and can

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU timestamp queries

LGTM1 Thanks for working through this issue!! On Wed, Nov 8, 2023 at 2:34 AM Domenic Denicola wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 7, 2023 at 5:42 PM François Beaufort > wrote: > >> >> >> On Mon, Oct 30, 2023 at 7:39 PM Mike Taylor >> wrote: >> >>> On 10/30/23 12:59 PM, Corentin Wallez wrote: >>> >>> On

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FedCM extensions: Error API and Auto-Selected Flag API

;>>> to IdP or RP, we could share with them the outcome such that they can >>>>>> better understand the flow and handle things differently. e.g. for >>>>>> metrics >>>>>> purposes they could know how many transactions were do

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS spelling and grammar features

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 1:37 AM Stephen Chenney wrote: > The CSS Spelling and Grammar feature has been active behind experimental > web platform features since M89! There are no open bugs. I would like to > turn it on at last for M120. > > Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org, dazab...@igalia.com

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Highlight Inheritance

On Tue, Oct 31, 2023 at 1:45 PM Stephen Chenney wrote: > Contact emailsschen...@chromium.org > > Specificationhttps://drafts.csswg.org/css-pseudo-4/#highlight-cascade > > Summary > > With CSS Highlight Inheritance, the CSS Highlight pseudo classes, such as > ::selection and ::highlight, inherit t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU on Android

LGTM3 On Fri, Oct 27, 2023 at 11:12 PM 'Brandon Jones' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Thanks! It was unclear what the procedure was here since this isn't a new > feature, just enabling it on a new platform. I'll make sure they are > updated appropriately. > > --Brandon > > On Fr

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API: aggregation coordinator selection

LGTM3 On Friday, October 27, 2023 at 11:35:52 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/27/23 5:13 PM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Fri, Oct 20, 2023 at 9:44 AM Alex Turner wrote: > >> Contact emails >> >> ale...@chromium.org >> >> Explainer >> https://github.com/patcg-individual-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Array.fromAsync

LGTM2 % administrative shenanigans regarding the review gates On Thu, Oct 26, 2023 at 2:16 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > Sorry, we're still learning this new chromestatus process (and a similar > concern came up in our API OWNERs meeting earlier today). My understanding > is that we should have _somet

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to ship: The Login Status API and its use in FedCM

LGTM3 On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 8:44 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/25/23 2:39 PM, 'Rick Byers' via blink-dev wrote: > > FWIW since the PR has landed, the correct link to reference the spec is > https://fedidcg.github.io/FedCM/#browser-api-login-status. Since WebKit > has expressed some int

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Permissions policy violation reports

t 8:42 AM Ian Clelland > wrote: > >> >> >> On Wed, Oct 25, 2023 at 4:35 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:24 PM Ian Clelland >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Contact emails iclell...@chromium.org

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: MediaCapabilities: Query HDR support with decodingInfo()

On Thursday, October 19, 2023 at 1:18:44 AM UTC+2 blink-dev wrote: Contact emailsv...@microsoft.com, gw...@microsoft.com, gur...@microsoft.com , dalecur...@chromium.org Explainerhttps://github.com/w3c/media-capabilities/blob/main/ explainer.md#decode-capabilities Specificationhttps://www.w3.or

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebAssembly Multi-Memory

LGTM1 On Wednesday, October 25, 2023 at 4:24:04 PM UTC+2 Clemens Backes wrote: > There has not been an update on this ITS in 8 days. What's the expected > timeline to get the LGTMs? > > As the M120 branch cut is around the corner, I'll go ahead and prepare the > launch, given that this is a fea

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Fenced Frame - Functionality Updates

Can you kick off the review on the 5 other review categories in the chromestatus entry? On Friday, October 20, 2023 at 10:37:37 PM UTC+2 blink-dev wrote: > Contact emails > > shivani...@chromium.org jkar...@chromium.org lbr...@google.com > Explainer(s) > > Send Automatic Beacons To All Register

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: FedCM extensions: Error API and Auto-Selected Flag API

On Monday, October 23, 2023 at 3:03:59 PM UTC+2 blink-dev wrote: Contact emails y...@chromium.org Explainer https://github.com/fedidcg/FedCM/issues/488 It'd be useful to write a short (inline?) explainer here outlining what this does and how it'd look like. Specifically, would we start thr

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate and remove Theora support.

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:05 PM Dale Curtis wrote: > WMF has long switched away from Theora (to VP9) per prior discussions with > them and seconded by this comment: > https://phabricator.wikimedia.org/T329258#9275042 > > Switching to H264+MP4 is not necessary to avoid this deprecation. VP9

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Permissions policy violation reports

On Tue, Oct 24, 2023 at 7:24 PM Ian Clelland wrote: > Contact emailsiclell...@chromium.org > > Explainer > https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-permissions-policy/blob/main/reporting.md > > Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/webappsec-permissions-policy/#reporting > > Design docs > https://github.com

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: WebGPU maxBindGroupsPlusVertexBuffers limit

LGTM1 On Tuesday, October 24, 2023 at 3:32:23 PM UTC+2 blink-dev wrote: Contact emails fbeauf...@google.com, cwal...@google.com Specification https://gpuweb.github.io/gpuweb/#dom-gpusupportedlimits- maxbindgroupsplusvertexbuffers Summary The WebGPU maxBindGroupsPlusVertexBuffers limit is the

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Scrollbars: scrollbar-color, scrollbar-width

LGTM1 On Mon, Oct 23, 2023 at 10:14 AM Luke wrote: > > I'm guessing we're missing ways to test if the styles were applied. Is > that correct? > > If so, can you file relevant WPT bugs to make sure we'd be able to > expand coverage in the future? > > Yeah I'll take a look into filing those bugs,

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Scrollbars: scrollbar-color, scrollbar-width

Thanks for working on this!! On Sat, Oct 21, 2023 at 4:58 AM Luke wrote: > Yes, it will work on all Scrollbars on all platforms including overlay on > macOS. :) > > On Sat, 21 Oct 2023, 03:56 Šime Vidas, wrote: > >> Will scrollbar-color work on overlay scrollbars on macOS? It does in >> Firefox

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Experiment: IP Protection Phase 0

I think it makes sense to file a TAG review as FYI in the future (non-blocking for this experiment) just to let the TAG know that this is happening, as it changes things significantly when it comes to fingerprinting data (by making other avenues of fingerprinting data more valuable than they curren

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

; > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 1:59 AM Domenic Denicola > wrote: > >> >> >> On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 12:51 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>> >>> >>> On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:34:21 AM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote: >>> >>>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Re-implement and Ship: CSS Font Loading API - FontFaceSet: check() method

are due to other factors (e.g., pixel mismatches), not > FontFaceSet::check(). Sub-tests on the check() method have passed. > > [1] https://caniuse.com/mdn-api_fontfaceset_check > > -- > ChangSeok > > > On Oct 17, 2023, at 4:29 AM, Yoav Weiss wrote: > > > > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

Great! My LGTM stands, but please wait for the relevant reviews to complete before starting the experiment. On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 6:43 PM Lutz Vahl wrote: > Clarified with Jason offline. Thanks again! > Reviews are triggered now. PTAL. > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 8:44 AM Yoav

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:45 PM Lutz Vahl wrote: > I've adjusted the stage to 'Origin Trial' and added the OT milestones. > Does this trigger the relevant reviews? > It does not.. +Jason Robbins - can you assist? > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 4:35 AM Yoav Weiss w

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

Oops! Can you start the reviews for privacy, security and debuggability in the new status entry? On Tuesday, October 17, 2023 at 1:34:44 PM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > LGTM to experiment M120 to M121 > > On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 2:25:00 PM UTC+2 Michael Lippautz wrote: > >&

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

LGTM to experiment M120 to M121 On Monday, October 16, 2023 at 2:25:00 PM UTC+2 Michael Lippautz wrote: > On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 3:58 PM Michael Lippautz > wrote: > >> Thanks! >> >> On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:52 AM Yoav Weiss >> wrote: >> >>&

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: WebGPU f16 support

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 1:56 AM Ken Russell wrote: > Got it - thanks Chris. > > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 4:54 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> I don't think you need to do anything else. We'll re-review this intent >> at our next meeting Wednesday morning PDT. >> >> The securit

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Re-implement and Ship: CSS Font Loading API - FontFaceSet: check() method

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 8:15 PM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/16/23 1:35 PM, Alex Russell wrote: > > LGTM1 > > On Sun, Oct 15, 2023 at 1:01 PM ChangSeok Oh wrote: > >> Contact emails >> changseok...@bytedance.com, shivami...@gmail.com >> >> Specification >> https://drafts.csswg.org/css-font

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Fenced Frame - Functionality Updates

On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 9:42 PM 'Liam Brady' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Contact emails > > shivani...@chromium.org d...@chromium.org jkar...@chromium.org > lbr...@google.com > Explainer(s) > > Send Automatic Beacons To All Registered Destinations > > https://github.com/WICG/t

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Attribution Reporting API feature (aggregation coordinator selection)

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:05 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 10/16/23 7:48 AM, Nan Lin wrote: > > Thanks Mike, please see the inline comment. > > On Mon, Oct 16, 2023 at 10:41 AM Mike Taylor > wrote: > >> >> Interoperability and Compatibility >> >> The change is backwards compatible,

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: PointerEvent.deviceId for Mult-Pen Inking

On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 12:42 AM Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 > On 10/15/23 11:07 AM, 'Sahir Vellani' via blink-dev wrote: > > Thanks for the feedback, I wasn't aware they were mandatory. The steps > have been started, just awaiting feedback from Security and Privacy > reviewers. I've received LGTM

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: CSS Exponential Functions

LGTM2 On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 11:53 AM Philip Jägenstedt wrote: > LGTM1, when Gecko and WebKit have already shipped there isn't much to > discuss :) > > On Tue, Oct 17, 2023 at 10:00 AM Daniil Sakhapov > wrote: > >> Contact emailssakha...@chromium.org, seo...@chromium.org >> >> Specification >>

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Unrestricted access to performance.measureUserAgentSpecificMemory()

This is exciting! Thanks for working on this!! On Fri, Oct 13, 2023 at 10:42 AM Michael Lippautz wrote: > Contact emails > > v...@chromium.org, mlippa...@chromium.org > > Explainer > > https://github.com/WICG/performance-measure-memory > > Specification > > https://github.com/WICG/performance-me

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

ks to handle credential revocation with BFCache and his concerns with the snippet suggested upthread. It'd be great to address that. > Thanks! > vmpstr > > On Thu, Oct 12, 2023 at 2:32 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> I just discussed this with Fergal offline: >> &g

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: HTTPS pages with Cache-control: no-store and Back/Forward Cache

I just discussed this with Fergal offline: - The risky scenario is one where revocation of sensitive info (logout, access revoked) happens on the server-side only without a client-side update. - In such a scenario on a shared computer, someone could back-button their way into someon

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

LGTM1 On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:26 PM Tommy Steimel wrote: > > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 7:43 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> >> On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:55:09 AM UTC+2 chri...@google.com wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> Please update

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

w, the plan is to > experiment in 120. > > On Wed, Oct 11, 2023 at 11:04 AM Yoav Weiss > wrote: > >> One last question: what milestones are you planning to run this >> experiment on? >> >> On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 7:02:51 PM UTC+2 Patrick Meenan wr

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

LGTM2 On Thursday, October 5, 2023 at 7:50:14 AM UTC+2 Yoav Weiss wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 10:27 PM Traian Captan > wrote: > >> Hi Yoav, >> >> I don't know of Gecko's and WebKit's concrete implementation plans for >> Intersection Ob

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Close requests for CloseWatcher, , and popover=""

On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:34:21 AM UTC+2 Chris Harrelson wrote: Hi, While Alex's concerns are totally valid to consider from a feature design perspective, I think they are better to be discussed on the WHATWG issues for this feature. I chatted offline with Alex and he agreed about that

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

One last question: what milestones are you planning to run this experiment on? On Tuesday, October 10, 2023 at 7:02:51 PM UTC+2 Patrick Meenan wrote: On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 3:18 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: Can you briefly describe what the header parts are good for, and how would developers use

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Media Session API: enterpictureinpicture action

On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 12:55:09 AM UTC+2 chri...@google.com wrote: Hi, Please update your chromestatus entry to trigger the other 5 review categories for this intent. I think it's probably the case that you ended up with the wrong feature category and need to update it, sorry for any

Re: [blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: CSS Syntax for registered Custom Properties

LGTM3 On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:08:02 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2 > On 10/11/23 7:06 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > LGTM1 > > (Privacy and Security steps in Chromestatus are not completed but they are > unlikely to affect anything) > > /Daniel > On 2023-10-04 12:23, Rune Lillesv

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

LGTM3 once the PR lands :) On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 4:06:35 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM2, same condition. > On 10/11/23 7:16 AM, Daniel Bratell wrote: > > LGTM1 (dependent on the PR landing) > > Looks like the spec text is more or less complete with no remaining > possible showst

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

LGTM1 Thanks for the compat analysis! :) On Wednesday, October 11, 2023 at 3:28:03 AM UTC+2 David Baron wrote: > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:30 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:04 PM David Baron wrote: >> >>> Summary >>> >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Shared Storage API Enhancements

LGTM1 On Friday, October 6, 2023 at 4:41:48 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > Thanks Jason! > > And yes, Cammie (and team), please request approval bits in Chromestatus - > API OWNERs will wait on that (not approvals, just beginning the process for > each) before approving. > > thanks, > Mike > On

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

On Tue, Oct 10, 2023 at 8:27 AM Alex Russell wrote: > Why has this not been sent to the TAG? > There's no TAG requirement for an I2E, and this is defined as part of the IETF, so outside of the TAG's "jurisdiction". > > On Mon, Oct 9, 2023, 1:40 PM Patrick Meenan wrote: > >> Contact emailspmee

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: 'priority' HTTP request header

Thanks for adding that support! On Mon, Oct 9, 2023 at 10:40 PM Patrick Meenan wrote: > Contact emailspmee...@google.com > > ExplainerNone > Can you briefly describe what the header parts are good for, and how would developers use them? > > > Specificationhttps://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/rfc9

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to implement and ship: Media query support for video elements

LGTM1 Thanks for correcting this historical mistake! On Thu, Oct 5, 2023, 21:11 Dale Curtis wrote: > Contact emailsdalecur...@chromium.org > > ExplainerNone > We could almost use MDN as the explainer, other than my comment below. > > Specification > https://html.spec.whatwg.org/multipage/med

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

, > Traian > > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 3:46 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> >> >> On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:10:34 AM UTC+2 Traian Captan wrote: >> >> Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org >> >> ExplainerNone >> >> Sp

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

e a mailing list to broadcast these kinds of updates > more generally. Given that, we feel confident the impact will be minimal to > those testing the API. > > Alex > > On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 6:50 AM Yoav Weiss wrote: > >> Am I right to assume that the API is still

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Protected Audiences Negative Targeting

LGTM2 with the same conditions On Monday, October 2, 2023 at 11:00:07 PM UTC+2 Mike Taylor wrote: > LGTM1 % landing https://github.com/WICG/turtledove/pull/796. Please > follow up with the WPTs as well. > On 9/27/23 11:56 AM, Chris Harrelson wrote: > > Please fill out the other chromestatus revi

Re: [EXTERNAL] Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Implement and Ship: Feature detection for supported clipboard formats

Thanks for working on this! This seems like a welcome addition, and the example code of the current status quo is definitely something we need to solve! On Wednesday, September 20, 2023 at 6:50:40 PM UTC+2 snianu wrote: Thanks Chris for the clarification! Filed TAG review: https://github.com/w3

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

! > Alex > > On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 12:02 PM Chris Harrelson > wrote: > >> Please also fill out the other chromestatus review categories for this >> Intent, in particular for Privacy and Security, thanks. >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 11:14 PM Yo

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Intersection Observer Scroll Margin

On Tuesday, September 26, 2023 at 1:10:34 AM UTC+2 Traian Captan wrote: Contact emailstcap...@chromium.org ExplainerNone Specificationhttps://w3c.github.io/IntersectionObserver/#dom- intersectionobserver-scrollmargin Summary Intersection Observer scrollMargin allows developers to observe tar

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Experiment: Open popups as fullscreen windows

Personally, I'd love to see the Privacy and Security boxes in chromestatus turn to green before approving this, as this seems like a potentially risky feature. Bonus point for pointers to public notes from that review :) On Wednesday, October 4, 2023 at 6:25:58 AM UTC+2 ajayra...@google.com wro

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Deprecate and Remove: Same-origin blanket enforcement in CSPEE

LGTM1 Usage seems low enough to make this safe still. On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 2:24:11 AM UTC+2 Jun Kokatsu wrote: > Contact emails > > jkoka...@google.com > > Explainer > > None > > Specification > > https://github.com/w3c/webappsec-cspee/pull/28/files > > Summary > > Removes a special

[blink-dev] Re: Intent to Ship: Deprecate old CSS custom state syntax

On Friday, September 29, 2023 at 9:32:16 PM UTC+2 Alex Russell wrote: hrm, this is another instance of bikeshedding after shipping, and I'm not inclined to approve. Perhaps we can discuss at next week's API OWNERs meeting? We should definitely discuss this broader subject! Adding others

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Accordion pattern using name attribute on elements

On Fri, Sep 29, 2023 at 11:04 PM David Baron wrote: > Contact emailsdba...@chromium.org > > Explainerhttps://open-ui.org/components/accordion.explainer > > Specificationhttps://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9400 > > Summary > > This feature adds the ability to construct exclusive accordions using a

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

Thanks for clarifying and verifying! :) My LGTM still stands. On Wed, Oct 4, 2023 at 11:48 AM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > > > On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 8:46 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud > wrote: > >> On Tue, Oct 3, 2023 at 3:14 PM Yoav Weiss wrote: >> >>> LGT

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: HTMLSelectElement showPicker()

On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 4:40 AM Luke wrote: > Contact emails > lukewarlow...@gmail.com, l...@warlow.dev > > Explainer > https://github.com/whatwg/html/pull/9754 > Thanks for the explainer! :) What's preventing us from landing the PR? +Chris Harrelson - Can we mark Chromium as positive for WHAT

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Relaxed CSS Nesting

LGTM1 Thanks for evaluating the compat risk for this. While non-zero, it seems manageable given Mozilla already shipping this, with Safari likely to follow, given the landed implementation. On Mon, Oct 2, 2023 at 1:30 PM Anders Hartvoll Ruud wrote: > Contact emails > > andr...@chromium.org > >

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Prototype: 'firstrender' event

This is exciting!! (also as a scheduling primitive - e.g. as a way to start loading or executing certain scripts only after the first render) Are you planning to have the event first more or less at a similar time to when first paint is reported? I'm guessing that we want that event to run after re

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 11:50 AM Philipp Hancke < philipp.han...@googlemail.com> wrote: > Am Mi., 27. Sept. 2023 um 08:07 Uhr schrieb Yoav Weiss < > yoavwe...@chromium.org>: > >> >> >> On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:47 PM 'David Adrian'

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Unprefix -webkit-background-clip for "text" and make it an alias

LGTM1 On Wed, Sep 27, 2023 at 2:38 AM 一丝 wrote: > I think the correct specification address would be > https://drafts.csswg.org/css-backgrounds-4/#typedef-bg-clip > > In css-backgrounds-4 also added `border` value, should we support it when > removing the prefix? Maybe this needs to be discussed

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: Private Aggregation API bundled enhancements

On Mon, Sep 25, 2023 at 11:52 PM Alex Turner wrote: > Contact emailsale...@chromium.org > > Specification > >- > >Null report fixes: >https://github.com/patcg-individual-drafts/private-aggregation-api/pull/91 >- > >Debug mode eligibility changes: >https://github.com/patcg-

Re: [blink-dev] Intent to Ship: DTLS ClientHello extension permutation (WebRTC)

On Tue, Sep 26, 2023 at 9:47 PM 'David Adrian' via blink-dev < blink-dev@chromium.org> wrote: > Great follow up to > https://groups.google.com/a/chromium.org/g/blink-dev/c/bYZK81WxYBo/m/lKLrZ_P2BwAJ. > Big fan! > > On Fri, Sep 22, 2023 at 12:00 AM 'Philipp Hancke' via blink-dev < > blink-dev@chrom

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >