Hi,
2016-01-20 18:42 GMT+01:00 moeller0 :
> Hi Etienne,
>
> I could be out to lunch, but I always assumed for virtual interfaces the
> txque does not matter as packets are immediate passed to the real interface.
>
This was not the case in the past (I remember losing quite some time on
this some
Hi Etienne,
I could be out to lunch, but I always assumed for virtual interfaces the txque
does not matter as packets are immediate passed to the real interface.
Best Regards
Sebastian
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 18:09 , Etienne Champetier
> wrote:
>
>
>
> 2016-01-20 17:54 GMT+01:00 Bran
Hi Brandon,
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 17:10 , Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> I’m getting more confused as I go on :)
>
> So I’ve rebooted and the tc classes seem to have come back. Since this is
> Ubuntu 12.04 - it doesn NOT have systemd. I mention this because I see there
> is a systemd config i
Last I looked at this you can attach a qdisc to a virtual interface, but
there is no backpressure, since the interface is virtual and the real
interface it feeds will never 'stop' accepting packets (since you are
really feeding into another qdisc).
So you can do things like rate pacing, loggin
2016-01-20 17:54 GMT+01:00 Brandon Applegate :
>
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Etienne Champetier <
> champetier.etie...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
> e quickly read the thread (maybe too quickly),
>
> from what i remember for virtual interface txqueuelen is 0 by default, so
> nothing wo
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:47 AM, Etienne Champetier
> wrote:
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
> e quickly read the thread (maybe too quickly),
> from what i remember for virtual interface txqueuelen is 0 by default, so
> nothing work as expected
> can you check the txqueuelen with ip -a ?
> (i've found no re
Hi Brandon,
2016-01-20 17:34 GMT+01:00 Brandon Applegate :
>
>
> > On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Brandon Applegate
> wrote:
> >
> > I’m getting more confused as I go on :)
> >
> > So I’ve rebooted and the tc classes seem to have come back. Since this
> is Ubuntu 12.04 - it doesn NOT have system
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:10 AM, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> I’m getting more confused as I go on :)
>
> So I’ve rebooted and the tc classes seem to have come back. Since this is
> Ubuntu 12.04 - it doesn NOT have systemd. I mention this because I see there
> is a systemd config in the sqm
On 20/01/16 16:10, Brandon Applegate wrote:
I’m getting more confused as I go on :)
So I’ve rebooted and the tc classes seem to have come back. Since this is
Ubuntu 12.04 - it doesn NOT have systemd. I mention this because I see there
is a systemd config in the sqm-scripts package.
I have n
I’m getting more confused as I go on :)
So I’ve rebooted and the tc classes seem to have come back. Since this is
Ubuntu 12.04 - it doesn NOT have systemd. I mention this because I see there
is a systemd config in the sqm-scripts package.
I have not added any hooks to run 'sqm start’ - nevert
Hi Brandon,
First, thanks a lot.
On January 20, 2016 4:30:25 PM GMT+01:00, Brandon Applegate
wrote:
>I’ll try to tackle what I can for now below inline.
>
>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:30 AM, moeller0 wrote:
>>
>> Hi Brandon,
>>
>>
>>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 00:33 , Brandon Applegate
>wrote:
>>>
Okay so at least the egress uplinks seems okay, maybe a bit too generous, at
5Mbps contracted speed, maybe 4500Kbps would be a more cautious starting point.
But in essence this looks good, I fail to see the ingress ifb4eth0.666, so can
offer any opinion on that.
On January 20, 2016 4:15:35 PM G
I’ll try to tackle what I can for now below inline.
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 6:30 AM, moeller0 wrote:
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
>
>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 00:33 , Brandon Applegate wrote:
>>
>> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
>> This is specifically about the sq
Here’s the output to check the rates.
root@ice:/etc/sqm# head -2 eth0.666.iface.conf
UPLINK=5000
DOWNLINK=3
root@ice:/etc/sqm# tc class show dev eth0.666
class htb 1:11 parent 1:1 leaf 110: prio 1 rate 128000bit ceil 1666Kbit burst
1600b cburst 1599b
class htb 1:1 root rate 5000Kbit ceil 500
Hi Brandon,
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 15:51 , Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Alan Jenkins
>> wrote:
>>
>>
>> No offense to your work on sqm-scripts.
>>
>>
>> 1) It's just in case the problem is *outside* of sqm-scripts, it could be
>> useful to try the minimum
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:06 AM, Alan Jenkins
> wrote:
>
>
> No offense to your work on sqm-scripts.
>
>
> 1) It's just in case the problem is *outside* of sqm-scripts, it could be
> useful to try the minimum commands necessary to demonstrate the problem.
> Maybe it's unfair but I assumed r
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 7:37 AM, Rich Brown wrote:
>
> Hi Brandon,
>
> One more (very) simple test - what are your speeds *without* any SQM/shaping?
> I didn't see it mentioned in your report, and let's be sure that you're
> shaping the traffic to the actual achievable link speeds...
>
> I rece
Hi Brandon,
One more (very) simple test - what are your speeds *without* any SQM/shaping? I
didn't see it mentioned in your report, and let's be sure that you're shaping
the traffic to the actual achievable link speeds...
I recently helped a friend whose "15 mbps/1mbps" DSL just wouldn't get ab
Hi Alan,
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 13:06 , Alan Jenkins
> wrote:
> [...]
> No offense to your work on sqm-scripts.
None taken ;) I really just want to use the opportunity to a) get
Brandon up and running and b) fix any short-comings on sqm-scripts on the way.
>
>
> 1) It's just in case
On 20/01/16 11:43, moeller0 wrote:
On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:12 , Alan Jenkins
wrote:
On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote:
Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
Hello,
I’ve been reading all I can on th
Hi Alan, hi Brandon:
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:15 , Alan Jenkins
> wrote:
>
> On 20/01/2016, Alan Jenkins wrote:
>> On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>>> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
>>> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
>>>
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 11:12 , Alan Jenkins
> wrote:
>
> On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
>> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferblo
Hi Brandon,
> On Jan 20, 2016, at 00:33 , Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
>
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferbloat website and also trying to
>
On 20/01/2016, Alan Jenkins wrote:
> On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
>> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
>>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferbloat website and also tryi
On 19/01/2016, Brandon Applegate wrote:
> Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know.
> This is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
>
> Hello,
>
> I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferbloat website and also trying to
> understand the evolution of the vari
> On 20 Jan, 2016, at 02:14, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> It seems to have the same effect ether I’m operating on eth0 or eth0.666.
> Here’s the requested output when I’m operating on eth0.666.
Is that after running a bandwidth test? It looks like most of the traffic is
on eth0.
- Jonatha
> On Jan 19, 2016, at 7:09 PM, Jonathan Morton wrote:
>
> I’m not sure whether a qdisc can be attached to a virtualised interface in
> this way. Can you run ‘tc -s qdisc’ and show us the output?
>
It seems to have the same effect ether I’m operating on eth0 or eth0.666.
Here’s the requeste
> On 20 Jan, 2016, at 01:33, Brandon Applegate wrote:
>
> My topology is ‘on a stick’. I have one gig interface to a managed switch,
> on which are eth0.666 (outside/wan) and eth0.10 (inside).
>
> No matter what I do - my bandwidth is 10% of what it should be. I get
> approx. 3/4mbit down +
Disclaimer: if this is the wrong list for such a question - let me know. This
is specifically about the sqm-scripts package...
Hello,
I’ve been reading all I can on the bufferbloat website and also trying to
understand the evolution of the various scripts (debloat, sqm, etc).
I managed to get
29 matches
Mail list logo
