On Wednesday 16 May 2007, Sanford Dickert wrote:
> > I vote against this and the reasons are as easy: Google (groups) has
> > nothing to do with Open Source, Data or Standards and their services
> > also have technical problems (I don't want to blame them, but that's the
> > situation).
I would v
Daniel -
On 5/16/07, Daniel Leidert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 16.05.2007, 05:29 -0700 schrieb Tobias Kind:
> Sanford wrote to move the mailing list to google groups.
I vote against this and the reasons are as easy: Google (groups) has
nothing to do with Open Source, Data or
Am Mittwoch, den 16.05.2007, 05:29 -0700 schrieb Tobias Kind:
> Sanford wrote to move the mailing list to google groups.
I vote against this and the reasons are as easy: Google (groups) has
nothing to do with Open Source, Data or Standards and their services
also have technical problems (I don't
Hi,
Sanford wrote to move the mailing list to google groups.
I think thats *very important* to get some fresh air
into the discussions and to invite more people to take part
in certain developments. Easy access is the very first part.
People who are not programmers usually do not have a SF.net
lo
All -
Couple of thoughts:
1. Keeping BO on a school server or on SF is one way, I might also highly
recommend using google groups for the mailing list service and their ongoing
feature growth. With the search capabilities and the chance to reference
the material once again might be a good idea
Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote:
>> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Christoph Steinbeck:
>>> As the owner of the domain "blueobelisk.org" and current host of the BO
>>> sites, I agree with all that has been said.
>>> The most important thing:
Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Christoph Steinbeck:
> Egon already registered bodr.sourceforge.net.
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/bodr
Sure, but this has a different and more limited scope (dr) as the name
implies.
> You should talk with Egon and deci
On Tuesday 08 May 2007, Daniel Leidert wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Christoph Steinbeck:
> > As the owner of the domain "blueobelisk.org" and current host of the BO
> > sites, I agree with all that has been said.
> > The most important thing: We need a stable location.
Am Dienstag, den 08.05.2007, 13:52 +0200 schrieb Christoph Steinbeck:
> As the owner of the domain "blueobelisk.org" and current host of the BO
> sites, I agree with all that has been said.
> The most important thing: We need a stable location.
> My choice would be SourceForge and I've taken the fr
As the owner of the domain "blueobelisk.org" and current host of the BO
sites, I agree with all that has been said.
The most important thing: We need a stable location.
My choice would be SourceForge and I've taken the freedom to register
the project *blueobelisk* at SourceForge.
SF allows us to as
Since nobody is in charge of the Blue Obelisk, and since the community
is very distributed, I think SourceForge is a better choice than to
host it at a particular university or on someone's own hosting
resources. What we lose in performance, we gain in long-time
stability, as the site access will
Hi,
I can provide also hosting at the Department of Chemistry, Strasbourg
University.
Jerome Pansanel
Le mardi 8 mai 2007 02:54, Geoffrey Hutchison a écrit :
> On May 7, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
> > Do others agree? Several universities (e.g. Cambridge) provide Mailman
> > mailing
On May 7, 2007, at 5:39 PM, Noel O'Boyle wrote:
Do others agree? Several universities (e.g. Cambridge) provide Mailman
mailing lists so it shouldn't be difficult to find a suitable location
with zero maintenance required.
I've also offered to host either the mailing lists or whole
blueobeli
Am Montag, den 07.05.2007, 22:39 +0100 schrieb Noel O'Boyle:
> Considering the upcoming closure of CUBIC (as I understand it) could I
> suggest moving the BO mailing list? For a number of months it has been
> impossible to subscribe to the mailing via the web interface, which
> means that we may ha
Considering the upcoming closure of CUBIC (as I understand it) could I
suggest moving the BO mailing list? For a number of months it has been
impossible to subscribe to the mailing via the web interface, which
means that we may have lost a number of potential contributors.
Do others agree? Severa
15 matches
Mail list logo
