Andreas thanks for taking the time to put all those bits together in
your post. And would like to add that you are not the first developer
stating that there were an artificial barrier for LOOL development and
that is reflected in the lack of contributions back claimed by Lazlo.
/me don't
Hi Andreas, all
Le 25/06/2022 à 00:05, Andreas Mantke a écrit :
Hi all,
FYI: I wrote a short blog post about my work. And for those who like
visuals, I added two ones.
https://amantke.de/2022/06/25/work-on-revival-of-libreoffice-online/
Thanks a lot for your work on this, I really appreciate
Hi all,
FYI: I wrote a short blog post about my work. And for those who like
visuals, I added two ones.
https://amantke.de/2022/06/25/work-on-revival-of-libreoffice-online/
Regards,
Andreas
--
## Free Software Advocate
## Plone add-on developer
## My blog: http://www.amantke.de/blog
--
To
Hi all,
Am 24.06.22 um 20:57 schrieb laszlo.nem...@documentfoundation.org:
> Hi Andreas,
>
> On 2022-06-24 17:51, Andreas Mantke wrote:
> (..)
>>
>> I also have no idea why it's not possible to work on a common ground of
>> LOOL (LibreOffice Online) and why it is/was instead necessary to fork
>>
Hi Andreas,
On 2022-06-24 17:51, Andreas Mantke wrote:
Hi Laszlo, all,
I'm not sure, if you as a former Collabora staff member don't any
potential CoI in the whole topic.
I'd prefer if only community members without potential CoI share their
opinion on this topic.
I'm not only a former
Hi Laszlo, all,
I'm not sure, if you as a former Collabora staff member don't any
potential CoI in the whole topic.
I'd prefer if only community members without potential CoI share their
opinion on this topic.
I also have no idea why it's not possible to work on a common ground of
LOOL
Hi,
On 2022-06-23 17:09, Paolo Vecchi wrote:
Hi Andreas,
thank you for letting us know that you are working on it.
Ideally it would be great to have a few developers working on it,
especially to fix known security issues, and sufficient activity to
make it viable.
It is true that LOOL has
Hi Paolo, all,
no objections. I'd Prüfer that too. But we should make developer life mouch
more easy and also implement tools like the workflows available on github.
Regards,
Andreas
Am 24. Juni 2022 12:37:54 MESZ schrieb Paolo Vecchi
:
>Hi Andreas,
>
>it's great to see this types of
Dear list,
just the occasional reminder, to please:
- be inclusive, and patient - lets have email threads make incremental
progress towards a shared understanding (and stop, once we realize we
need to agree to disagree)
- recognise each other as humans (with our different quirks &
El 22.06.2022 11:49, Paolo Vecchi escribió:
Hi all,
as finally many of the changes requested by other proposals are clear
I've integrated what makes sense to have on a developers recruitment
proposal and added a few items clarifying some aspect in version 2.2
(in ODF format) of this "merged"
Hi Andreas,
it's great to see this types of cooperation offers.
I might be biased but I would prefer to see the project on TDF's
infrastructure and covered by the appropriate agreements so that we can
ensure we invest on a project that will clearly provide long term
benefits for the wider
Hi Paolo, Franklin, all,
it would be great, if we could work together on a process to merge both
branches together and get the community versions in sync. I think this could be
done most easy on Github.
Regards,
Andreas
Am 24. Juni 2022 11:29:16 MESZ schrieb Paolo Vecchi
:
>Hi Franklin,
>
Hi Simon,
thanks for bringing up those points.
On 24/06/2022 11:49, Simon Phipps wrote:
Hi Franklin,.
Why is this better than working with the version Collabora (who
actually contribute to TDF's work) maintain?
I believe that Collabora has been explicitly asked a few time if they
were
Hi Daniel,
thanks for sharing your experience with OxOOL!
We definitely have to look at it in more details.
LOOL is in the agenda for Monday's BoD meeting, please come along to
comment about it.
Ciao
Paolo
On 24/06/2022 12:00, Daniel A. Rodriguez wrote:
As Franklin mentioned, the
As Franklin mentioned, the university where I work (UNAU) is using OxOOL since
2020. And works like a charm have to add.
Would love to have it's features as LOOL base.
El 24 de junio de 2022 1:37:32 a. m. GMT-03:00, Franklin Weng
escribió:
>Hi,
>
>
>Here I have a proposal: to have LOOL
Hi Franklin,.
Why is this better than working with the version Collabora (who actually
contribute to TDF's work) maintain? Why should TDF hire developers to
maintain code for the Taiwanese government?
Sincerely.
Simon
On Fri, Jun 24, 2022 at 5:47 AM Franklin Weng
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
> Here I
Hi Franklin,
thanks for the great proposal.
As the LOOL archival discussion is planned for Monday I'll ask the board
to modify the agenda to start discussing your' and Andreas' proposal.
There is a lot that needs to be evaluated with the community to see if
and in which way we can make LOOL
17 matches
Mail list logo
