Tks =)
2011/8/13 Florian Effenberger
> Hi,
>
> Paulo de Souza Lima wrote on 2011-08-13 16:54:
>
> Just a question I'd like to ask:
>>
>> I SC private and Core@ the same list or not?
>>
>
> yes.
>
> Florian
>
> --
> Florian Effenberger
> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Fo
Hi,
Paulo de Souza Lima wrote on 2011-08-13 16:54:
Just a question I'd like to ask:
I SC private and Core@ the same list or not?
yes.
Florian
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: fl
2011/8/12 Charles-H. Schulz
> Hello David,
>
> Afaict I list the following ones:
> SC private
>
Just a question I'd like to ask:
I SC private and Core@ the same list or not?
Cheers.
--
Paulo de Souza Lima
Técnico em Eletrônica e Administrador
http://www.pasl.net.br
http://almalivre.wordpress
+1.
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> +1 :)
>
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 18:46:
>
>> Thank you Drew.
>>
>
> --
> Florian Effenberger
> Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
> Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
> Skype: floeff | Twitter/Ident
+1 :)
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 18:46:
Thank you Drew.
--
Florian Effenberger
Steering Committee and Founding Member of The Document Foundation
Tel: +49 8341 99660880 | Mobile: +49 151 14424108
Skype: floeff | Twitter/Identi.ca: @floeff
--
Unsubscribe instructions: E-mail to stee
2011/8/12 drew
> On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:08 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52:
> > > Is it exhaustive?
> >
> > I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference
> > jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 18:08 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52:
> > Is it exhaustive?
>
> I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference
> jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to.
> Everyone had a chance to
Hi,
drew wrote on 2011-08-12 17:52:
Is it exhaustive?
I just checked the mailing list system. There still is the conference
jury mailing list, where all paper submissions are being sent to.
Everyone had a chance to join the jury, we made a public call. Jury
discussions are not meant to be a
On Fri, 2011-08-12 at 17:48 +0200, Florian Effenberger wrote:
> Hi,
>
> yep, your list is correct.
Is it exhaustive?
Tanks,
Drew
> Some details:
>
> Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 16:20:
>
> > SC private
>
> Contains of steering committee plus deputies, plus a few people who have
>
Hi,
yep, your list is correct. Some details:
Charles-H. Schulz wrote on 2011-08-12 16:20:
SC private
Contains of steering committee plus deputies, plus a few people who have
been involved in the discussion of setting up a foundation, even before
TDF was born. Recipient list should be re-de
arly no-one here has
bad intentions.
Regards from
Tom :)
From: Paulo de Souza Lima
To: steering-discuss@documentfoundation.org
Sent: Fri, 12 August, 2011 15:27:28
Subject: Re: [steering-discuss] List discussion & purpose
2011/8/12 David Nelson
>
2011/8/12 David Nelson
> Hi Florian,
>
> On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Florian Effenberger
> wrote:
> > I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a
> private
> > list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there are
> > private phone calls sometimes
Hello David,
Afaict I list the following ones:
SC private
AB private
Web infrastructure
Security
Marketing private (for pr drafting and readiness)
As I am personally not subscribed to all of them I might have missed one or
taken one as private while it is public.
Best,
Charles.
Le 12 août 2011 1
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> Hi,
>
>
>
> I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a
> private list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there
> are private phone calls sometimes.
>
> We never planned to have things in secret, so sorry if that i
Hi Florian,
On Fri, Aug 12, 2011 at 4:46 PM, Florian Effenberger
wrote:
> I think it has been discussed in public rather often that there is a private
> list where all the steering committee members are on, and that there are
> private phone calls sometimes.
>
> We never planned to have things in
Hi,
Paulo de Souza Lima wrote on 2011-08-12 14:09:
I do agree to what Charles said, but I have some things to say on that:
There should have a public note, somewhere, explaining that private lists do
exist and showing the requirements for a member to be accepted in those
lists. What I think is
2011/8/12 Charles-H. Schulz
> Hello,
>
> 2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
>
> To second Florian's point about the private list, and to answer Drew's
> requests, it is actually rather simple. There is no decision by principle
> taken privately on the private mailing list. In fact the steering-discus
Hello,
2011/8/12 Florian Effenberger
> Hello,
>
> let me jump in quickly with a few thoughts:
>
> - The set-up of this list was discussed in one of last year's steering
> commitee public conference calls, and if I remember correctly, it was even a
> demand by the community, not by the steering c
Hello,
let me jump in quickly with a few thoughts:
- The set-up of this list was discussed in one of last year's steering
commitee public conference calls, and if I remember correctly, it was
even a demand by the community, not by the steering committee. (Which
does not mean we do not conside
I fully agree with Drew.
Maintaining closed lists is a (bad) behavior from the times of
OpenOffice.org and should be abandoned if you want to have a good and clear
relationship with the community as a whole. Closed lists caused a lot of
problems and distrust in brazillian community. Actually we ha
Hi,
I find this list to be a very useful point of contact with the SC. If
people avoid using it for other purposes than discussions in which
there is a genuine utility in involving the SC then SC members will be
encouraged to read it regularly and properly, and the list will indeed
serve its true
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 20:28 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Hi Drew,
>
> While there's a list for confidential matters
and it would be good to:
1- Disclose _all_ private lists used by TDF, along with who in the
community is on those lists. To do otherwise is to have both private and
secret li
Hi Drew,
While there's a list for confidential matters we intend and want to have a
dexision making process that's transparent. This list was designed with the
notion that it'd be both a formal tool (voting, opinions of the BoD
members, etc.) and a communication tool for important an urgent matter
On Thu, 2011-08-11 at 14:10 +0200, Charles-H. Schulz wrote:
> Hi,
>
> This is a short reminder about the purpose of this list. It has been setup
> to serve as the SC / BoD primary communication channel. Therefore it
> accomodates SC members & requests from project members. While we do
> appreciate
Hi,
This is a short reminder about the purpose of this list. It has been setup
to serve as the SC / BoD primary communication channel. Therefore it
accomodates SC members & requests from project members. While we do
appreciate everyone's input we'd like to keep non-essential content on other
lists
25 matches
Mail list logo
