The boost::variant library, currently available at
Sourceforge/boost-sandbox, is ready for a formal review. We expect the
final version to be ready within a day or two, at which point we will place
a zipped package at the Boost's File section.
The formal review (scheduled by Thomas Witt) will
At 09:01 AM 2/10/2003, Toon Knapen wrote:
I think the traffic-light colors should suffice. I find adding black
confusing.
I agree. The traffic-light metaphor falls apart when you add black.
--Beman
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
At 10:07 PM 2/7/2003, Dave Gomboc wrote:
I suggest adding another boost defect: BOOST_BROKEN_ADL (or similar)
How about BOOST_LIBRARY_IMPL_VULNERABLE_TO_ADL? It's not that the
compiler's ADL implementation is broken, it's that the library
implementation isn't protected against ADL lookups where
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
[...]
Well in fact, the following assignment could be verified at
compile-time
with some smart_ptr checking policy:
class A { char c; };
class B { char c; };
class C : public A, public B { char c; };
smart_ptrC pC = new C;
smart_ptrA pA = pC;// Ok.
Hi!
I just updated the regression tests for AIX for both Visual Age 5 and
Visual Age 6 and I will try to update at least once a week until Toon
gets access to another maching.
On a side note, how do the compiler version numbers get into the
status tables? They don't show up for AIX and the
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 01:08 am, Lin Xu wrote:
Yeah, I guess it would. The syntax I had before was limited by my lack of
knowledge about how to extract the arguments and return type from a
classtype. But I can use function_traits right? But that requires partial
template specialization.
Hello boosters,
I've justed stumbled across a problem when using the BOOST_CLASS_TEST_CASE
macro in a special way.
I am using class based test cases and want to run every testcase from a
clean environment, i.e. I need to create a new instance of my test class
for every test case.
To keep the
Alexander Terekhov wrote:
Peter Dimov wrote:
[...]
You are missing the fact that nobody (even Google) has a clue as to what
pthread_refcount_enroll_one is/does. ;-)
Ah. Sorry. Basically it's a rather simple CAS- [compare-and-swap]
or LL/SC- [load-locked/store-conditional] based operation;
On 2003-02-12 5:56 AM, Philippe A. Bouchard [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
Jon Kalb wrote:
I wonder if it wouldn't be better to have a compile time error in this
situation rather than to create a trap for the unsuspecting. It does
put an additional burden on the user to ensure that the types are
Hello all,
We've noticed that normal_distribution using polar
method, rather then Box-Muller.
Is there a particular reason for not using Box-Muller?
Looks to me like a quite an easy way to improve performance.
The method with source code is described in Numerical Recipes.
Changing
[2003-02-11] Beman Dawes wrote:
At 09:01 AM 2/10/2003, Toon Knapen wrote:
I think the traffic-light colors should suffice. I find adding black
confusing.
I agree. The traffic-light metaphor falls apart when you add black.
Yea, but black is used in the regresion tests themselves. How does it
At 05:07 AM 2/11/2003, Paul A. Bristow wrote:
As for spell checking, MS FrontPage astonishingly doesn't appear to
include
a spelling checker ...
MS FrontPage has had a spell checker for years. Select tools menu, click
page options..., and select the spelling options you prefer.
HTH,
--Beman
At 12:48 PM 2/6/2003, Dave Abrahams wrote:
It looks like the intel compiler still supports long long when used
with
the -ansi option. I searched around for good specs, but could find no
definitive outline of what other restrictions it adds. So at least as
far
as long long is concerned,
Sorry for late reply... had a hard disk problem that prevented accessing
e-mail.
Peter Dimov said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
How about this compromise:
template typename R
class async_call
{
public:
template typename F
explicit async_call(const F f)
: m_func(f)
{
Peter Dimov said:
William E. Kempf wrote:
It's not just the efficiencies that concern me with dynamic
allocation. It's the additional points of failure that occur in this
case as well. For instance, check out the article on embedded coding
in the most recent CUJ (sorry, don't have the
Attached is a small patch for function_base.hpp. On line 302, there is
a T missing.
Markus
Index: function_base.hpp
===
RCS file: /cvsroot/boost/boost/boost/function/function_base.hpp,v
retrieving revision 1.57
diff -c -r1.57
Jon Kalb wrote:
[...]
I'm afraid that I don't see your point. How is this relevant?
It will prevent you to encounter this situation (if peak_of() is used only
with smart_ptrs). peak_of() won't have to deal with it.
It would also be possible to assert the parameter of peak_of() is valid, but
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:37 pm, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Attached is a small patch for function_base.hpp. On line 302, there is
a T missing.
Markus
Thanks. Applied.
Doug
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 12:41 pm, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Attached is a small patch for signals/trackable.hpp. According to
7.1.1(8), the mutable keyword cannot be applied on reference members
and Visual Age flags this as an error. I just removed the mutable
keyword an it compiles fine
Anyone who was working on it - what's the current state of play? The
flurry of mail on here a while back seemed to fizzle out. Is that
because development has stalled?
If I can help out with what limited time and knowledge of the subject
I have I will. I really want to see this library in
Thanks - I couldn't find 'spell' or 'spelling' in the Frontpage 'help'!
Paul
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]On Behalf Of Beman Dawes
Sent: Wednesday, February 12, 2003 4:31 PM
To: Boost mailing list; Boost mailing list
Subject: RE: [boost] Re:
At 09:48 AM 2/12/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
I just updated the regression tests for AIX for both Visual Age 5 and
Visual Age 6 and I will try to update at least once a week until Toon
gets access to another maching.
Thanks!
On a side note, how do the compiler version numbers get into the
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I've gone ahead and committed the change to CVS, but wonder if this is
really the option Ron wanted?. Intel's docs say:
-Qansi_alias directs the compiler to assume the following:
Arrays are not accessed out of bounds.
Pointers are not cast to
We've discussed making boost::ref/boost::cref work for arbitrary functions
objects before. I just committed a version of ref.hpp that supports this
ability to the sandbox. With this code, you can write:
std::transform(c.begin(), c.end(), out, boost::ref(f));
or, if you don't want the return
Once I heard there was a generic socket library in development, I thought I'd add
a quick feature request. I would like to see the ability to have multiple
streams through the same socket.
Having had recent issues with a game and a proxy/firewall, I thought that I might
try and see if I can do
Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've discussed making boost::ref/boost::cref work for arbitrary functions
objects before. I just committed a version of ref.hpp that supports this
ability to the sandbox. With this code, you can write:
std::transform(c.begin(), c.end(), out,
Hm...
- Functionvoid (A::*)(),A::Setz if the compiler supports PTS;
- If not, then the user would have to type in something like:
Function0void,A,A::Setz.
Looks good. Another (slightly offtopic) thing. I attempted to use
function_traits with a member function type. GCC spat out errors, and
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 07:15 pm, David Abrahams wrote:
Douglas Gregor [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
We've discussed making boost::ref/boost::cref work for arbitrary
functions objects before. I just committed a version of ref.hpp that
supports this ability to the sandbox. With this code,
On Wednesday 12 February 2003 09:11 pm, Lin Xu wrote:
Hm...
- Functionvoid (A::*)(),A::Setz if the compiler supports PTS;
- If not, then the user would have to type in something like:
Function0void,A,A::Setz.
Looks good. Another (slightly offtopic) thing. I attempted to use
function_traits
Sure. Fixed.
Gennadiy.
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Can you elaborate as to what the difference between Box-Muller and the implemented method is? As far as I understand Box-Muller it is just the implemented algorithm.
On Wednesday, February 12, 2003, at 09:30 AM, Lapshin, Kirill wrote:
Hello all,
We've noticed that normal_distribution using
Attached is a prelimary replacement for function_traits.hpp. (When should I
use the files section on yahoo? When should I attach? copy and paste code
inline?)
I added specializations for member function pointers, and for those
specializations, a typedef class_type which is the class type of
On Wed, 12 Feb 2003 18:37:51 +0100, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Attached is a small patch for function_base.hpp. On line 302, there is a
T missing.
Just a stupid question: Why is it missing? What is this patch supposed
to fix?
Regards, Daniel
___
33 matches
Mail list logo
