Reid Sweatman wrote:
>> > Another option might be: "create_directory_and_parents"
>> > That name is longer than "create_directories" although it better
>> > describes the function.
>>
>> I like "create_directory_path"
> That one's good, and captures the essential distinction well. Other
> possib
David Abrahams wrote:
> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Jeremy Siek <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> I seem to remember the named parameters mechanism being fragile
>>> under VC6.
>>
>> After a painstaking binary search in recent CVS states for the ICE, I
>> narrowed it down to:
David Abrahams wrote:
> The documentation for create_directories makes no sense. It says
> only:
>
> void create_directories( const path & ph );
>
> Precondition: ph.empty() ||
> forall p: p == ph || is_parent(p, ph): is_directory(p) || !exists( p )
>
> Postcondition: exists(ph
awhile ago I tried to compile this simple program:
#include
int main (){
return 0;
}
and Borland C++ Builder 6 refuse to compile.
I have track the problem and it seemed that Borland C++ builder has problem with template partial specialization with constant. The program below also refus
brock wrote:
[...]
>> Is it possible to associate widget instances with functions?
>
> Like with boost::bind?
>
>button b;
>edit e;
>
>button.set_on_pushed(boost::bind(&edit::disable_window, &e));
>
> (This is not how my library class names looks now, but how they will
> when rewritte
- Original Message -
From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 9:33 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI template library
> brock wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > What do you mean by "official macros"? The only ma
brock wrote:
[...]
> What do you mean by "official macros"? The only macros in my code
> are in
> the implementation, you shouldn't see any in user code.
Sorry I guess I have misinterpreted BEGIN_MESSAGE_MAP() in
boost_gui_test.cpp.
> I'm pretty
> sure
> they use macros in similar situations i
- Original Message -
From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 8:40 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI template library
[...]
> Find a way not to rely on "official macros". Those are false hopes.
What do
brock wrote:
[...]
>> - "boost_gui_test/dialog.cpp" is pretty cool... I like it for its
>> simplicity but the syntax could be even more elegant. Try some
>> operator << instead
> of
>> a macro defined number of parameters. Nobody likes this idea.
>
> Probably true, I think I was just looking fo
Thomas Witt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I'de like to get away from create. As I understand it, what we really
> want is to make sure a directory path actually exists without
> necessarily creating any directories. To me calling a create function
> for something that already exists should be an e
- Original Message -
From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sunday, August 03, 2003 8:04 PM
Subject: [boost] Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: Re: GUI/GDI template library
> brock wrote:
>
> [...]
>
> > Having a library with an interface that
> > leverages the a
brock wrote:
[...]
> Having a library with an interface that
> leverages the advantages of modern C++ saves me a lot more time than
> what I spent making the library.
That is true. Maintenance is important also.
[...]
> I've been proposing, something like:
>
>gui_manager app = row( "name"
Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
[...]
> emit (a.sigdone)(99);
Let's call it the placement "emit" operator ;)
Just joking...
Philippe
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
Personally I would much rather start from scratch. I want something that is
boost from the ground up, not a project that has a code so old it supports
MSVC 4.0. Who knows if the folks at wxWindows or elsewhere have the same
goals as boost. Don't they have an open source license? Developing a GU
Rene Rivera wrote:
> [2003-08-03] Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
>
>> WxWindows don't have any intermediate compiler but the end user
>> syntax is not attractive for the signal / slot mechanism (macros).
>
> Yes, and no. You can use the macros if you like that sort of stuff.
> But the signal/slot meca
Trying to continue GUI libraries review ( FLTK, WxWin )
Any ideas about VCF ( visual component framework ) sourceforge
project ?
Its original idea was taken from Borland C++ Builder.
Unfortunately, this IDE and VCL (pascal GUI library used
by Delphi and c++ builder) doesn't allow to use c++
fe
How about this one:
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
struct Object
{
};
template
struct signal : vector< pair >
{
typedef typename vector< pair >::value_type
value_type;
template
void connect(Object & o, T U::* s)
{
push_back(value_type(& o, static_cast(s)
David Abrahams wrote:
Dave Gomboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Ah, naming again. My favourite. :-)
It's not my favourite, but it matters.
I like create_path_and_directory. I prefer this order of the two terms
because logically the path exists before the directory itself does.
create_full_path
... or the following with the "emit" keyword defined as the only macro. The
function connect() could be simplified but I won't go further because it is
not pure C++. You take the decisions from here:
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
struct Object
{
};
template
struct si
Here is a better example. I am breaking standards when upcasting a pointer
to member though ((void (B::*)(int) -> (void (Object::*)(int))). This is
why I never proposed it ;)
#include
#include
#include
using namespace std;
struct Object
{
};
template
struct signal : list< pair >
{
Terje Slettebø wrote:
[...]
> It's also possible to do the signal/slot without macros on wxWindows.
> See here (http://www.wxwindows.org/hworld2.txt) for an example. It's
> all done in standard C++, without any macros.
It is a lot better this way, I was not aware of this new syntax. But it
seem
>From: "Philippe A. Bouchard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> WxWindows don't have any intermediate compiler but the end user syntax is
> not attractive for the signal / slot mechanism (macros).
It's also possible to do the signal/slot without macros on wxWindows. See
here (http://www.wxwindows.org/hworld2
[2003-08-03] Philippe A. Bouchard wrote:
>WxWindows don't have any intermediate compiler but the end user syntax is
>not attractive for the signal / slot mechanism (macros).
Yes, and no. You can use the macros if you like that sort of stuff. But the
signal/slot mecahnism is just as easilly avai
E. Gladyshev wrote:
> --- Rainer Deyke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> For a GUI library to be useful to me, it would need
>> to support custom
>> physical GUI layers. I would then write my own
> [...]
>> full-screen multimedia. I
>> realize that my needs are unusual, and boost::gui
>> may be unabl
Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
[...]
> Here is interesting review of five GUI toolkits, including wxWindows:
> http://freshmeat.net/articles/view/928/
For the Qt toolkit, they kinda forgot to mention that they work in parallel
with the KDE project (http://kde.org) so they have a huge open source
suppor
Dave Gomboc <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Ah, naming again. My favourite. :-)
>
> I like create_path_and_directory. I prefer this order of the two terms
> because logically the path exists before the directory itself does.
create_full_path(path, 'd')
create_full_path(path, 'f')
??
--
Dave Ab
>I've applied the first two; I'm not comfortable applying the regex
>patches myself; it takes someone who knows the library to verify that
>they're OK. John can do it, though, as far as I'm concerned.
done,
John.
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http
Misha Bergal <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "Misha Bergal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
>> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>> >
>> > Thanks. The hyperlinks to test failure logs don't ever scroll to the
>> > appropriate section of the output on IE6.
"Terje Slettebø" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Make no mistake - this is a lot of work, too. However, it may be much less
> work than creating one from scratch. What do we want - vaporware of a
Boost
> GUI library coming "real soon now", perhaps not appearing for ma
> > > > create_directory
> > > > and
> > > > create_directories
> > >
> > > Another option might be: "create_directory_and_parents"
> > > That name is longer than "create_directories" although it better
> > > describes the function.
> >
> > I like "create_directory_path"
>
> That one's good, and c
>From: "Rob & Lori" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> E. Gladyshev wrote:
>
> >--- Edward Diener <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >>As you have pointed out in the rest of your post, it
> >>may prove more
> >>worthwhile to work with the developers which already
> >>exist for a free
> >>cross-platform framework
>From: "Edward Diener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Terje Slettebø wrote:
> >> From: "Edward Diener" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >
> >> Add to this the fact that nearly every C++ programmer already works
> >> with a framework library depending on his implementation of choice.
> >> On Windows alone I know of WT
David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I am slightly concerned about the number of unexpected failures with
> intel7.1-stlport. Is there a configuration problem?
Yes, there is. The main trunks intel-win32-tools.jam,1.28 enables
wchar_t for our configuration but RC_1_30_0 intel-win32-tools
"Misha Bergal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> "David Abrahams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Thanks. The hyperlinks to test failure logs don't ever scroll to the
> > appropriate section of the output on IE6.
Fixed
> The compiler_status changes from main tru
34 matches
Mail list logo
