En réponse à Jeff Garland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:31:05 -0400, Jeremy B. Maitin-Shepard wrote
>
> > > Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think
> > > merge_inclusive is fine.
> >
> > How about "maximize" or "maximize_duration" or just "max" or
> > "max_durati
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 23:31:05 -0400, Jeremy B. Maitin-Shepard wrote
> > Yes, of course, it is not really a union either. I think
> > merge_inclusive is fine.
>
> How about "maximize" or "maximize_duration" or just "max" or
> "max_duration"?
Thx for the ideas, but...
I'm leary of these b/c this i
>>>
May I come with a bit of scepticism? There's already XUL (see
http://xulplanet.com for a start, and
http://www.mozilla.org/catalog/architecture/xul/ for more details).
I think Mozilla folks put some effort into it, so I wonder if XMLUI
offers
something new/better?
<<<
The main implementation
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 12:28:57 +1000 "Chris Trengove"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> "Jeff Garland" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in message
> news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > I don't think the it is technically a union because the result draws
> > in points in the time period that aren't part of either of the
Misha Bergal wrote:
> * there are still some failures on meta-intel-7.1-stlport
I remember I have recompiled the STLPort without wchat_t support for
RC_1_30_0. One of the failure will be resolved if I recompile STLPort with
wchar_t support. What I don't understand is why other tests pass.
--
M
David Abrahams wrote:
> Okay, I fixed that one. Nobody breathe... I'm going to tag it for
> release.
Our results are available now.
Looking at it:
* "static_assert" library name got somehow replaced with "libs".
* there are still some failures on meta-intel-7.1-stlport
--
Misha Bergal
MetaCo
David Abrahams wrote:
> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the
> RC_1_30_0 branch, though recent test updates at
>
> Would testers for the 1.30.2 release please be sure they're updating to
> RC_1_30_0 and post new results?
Dave,
I believe our results will be ready by 6:00pm
> >"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am not sure that it should be the responsibility of the path class to
>> enforce some notion of portability.
I haven't been following this whole discussion, but I'll chime in here b/c
I believe some of this might be partially due to comments I m
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
David Abrahams wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
"utility"-section seems t
At 02:10 PM 8/15/2003, Douglas Paul Gregor wrote:
>The test case libs/integer/cstdint_test.cpp includes and
> _before_ it defines __STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS. This means that on
>a platform that (a) supports defining the C99 macros in when
>__STDC_CONSTANT_MACROS is defined and (b) uses somewhere in
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> David Abrahams wrote:
>> > http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
>> > contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
>>
>> Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
>
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>> I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
>> branch, though recent test updates at
>> http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
>> contradict that. I find that very strange because I s
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
> > http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
> > contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
>
> Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
> "utility"-section seems to have di
David Abrahams wrote:
I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
branch, though recent test updates at
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
reproduced those problems and addressed them
David Abrahams wrote:
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
Also the latter run (Win32) stops after "type_traits". The
"utility"-section seems to have disappeared. Misha, can you have a look,
please?
Regards,
I believe I have now eliminated all the regressions in the RC_1_30_0
branch, though recent test updates at
http://tinyurl.com/k7vl and http://tinyurl.com/jtpd seem to
contradict that. I find that very strange because I specifically
reproduced those problems and addressed them on my machine, and
At 04:23 PM 8/15/2003, Peter Dimov wrote:
>Beman Dawes wrote:
>> At 01:40 PM 8/14/2003, Peter Dimov wrote:
>> >
>> >I am not sure that it should be the responsibility of the path
>> class to >enforce some notion of portability. Wouldn't it be more
>> appropriate to >defer the portability check,
At 08:46 PM 8/14/2003, Walter Landry wrote:
>"Peter Dimov" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> I am not sure that it should be the responsibility of the path class to
>> enforce some notion of portability. Wouldn't it be more appropriate to
>> defer the portability check, if any, to the point where the
Howard Hinnant <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 8:06 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>>> Thanks. I'll keep my fingers crossed...
>>
>> Still no joy :(
>
> Could you elaborate? Perhaps I could help.
Oh, just miscellaneous other regressions which are stopping the
release.
On Saturday, August 16, 2003, at 8:06 AM, David Abrahams wrote:
Thanks. I'll keep my fingers crossed...
Still no joy :(
Could you elaborate? Perhaps I could help.
-Howard
___
Unsubscribe & other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boo
"Mohamed Iqbal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Hi...
>
> Instead of downloading the complete Boost every time something has changed,
> why don't you consider 1.30.0 as a standard from subsequent releases until
> you reach 1.4.0 and so that we can only download only the modified
> libraries?
You ca
Dave Gomboc wrote:
> For example, while it is possible to think of all drives on an MS
> Windows machine as being part of a single filesystem, an individual
> using NTFS on
> C:, FAT32 on D:, FAT16 on E:, and FAT12 on A: reasonably would not.
Not only do I think of these drives as a single concept
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
>> as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
>> testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
>> instant you're fini
Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:11:09 +0200, David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>>
Hi Dave,
I checked in a fix for checked_delete.hpp for the Metrowerks CW8 to
C
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
>> I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
>> as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
>> testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
>> instant you're fini
Hi...
Instead of downloading the complete Boost every time something has changed,
why don't you consider 1.30.0 as a standard from subsequent releases until
you reach 1.4.0 and so that we can only download only the modified
libraries?
Mohammed
___
Martin Wille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> David Abrahams wrote:
>
> > I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
> > as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
> > testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
> > instant you're
David Abrahams wrote:
I have fixed the last regression (the one with crc_test) in CVS, so
as soon as you've made your patch and we've had one more round of
testing, I'm going to tag it for release. Please let me know the
instant you're finished.
Bad news, there is a new problem: One test uses
an
On Sat, 16 Aug 2003 04:11:09 +0200, David Abrahams wrote:
> David Abrahams <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> Daniel Frey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>> Hi Dave,
>>>
>>> I checked in a fix for checked_delete.hpp for the Metrowerks CW8 to
>>> CVS HEAD. It was created in cooperation with Howard a
Hi Paul,
Paul Hamilton wrote:
>> Is there a URL available for samples we could look at? Talking about
>> an XML
>> user interface description isn't something I can do in the abstract.
>
> No URL yet. I'll setup a SourceForge project for it and post the
> whitepaper. It's really not in a state wh
Hi Neal,
Neal D. Becker wrote:
> I'm lost with trying to use the (unreleased) program_options lib.
>
> I have no problem to use with just command line, but I'd like to have both
> command line and config file.
>
> Here's what I tried:
>
> try {
> options_description desc("Allowed options
Neal D. Becker wrote:
> I just found that program_options (from yahoo "files") has a serious
> defect. The value of an option cannot start with the character '-', or it
> will be interpreted as an option.
>
> Obviously, this makes it difficult to enter a negative number as the
> option value.
Hi
32 matches
Mail list logo
