Yes, you're right as far as 1.30.0 goes. The problem has been fixed in the
Boost CVS, however, so you can get an update there.
--Beman
At 06:27 PM 6/10/2003, Benjamin Dauvergne wrote:
Try to compile with(this is on a debian):
g++ test-fs-boost.cc -o test-fs-boost /usr/lib/libboost_filesystem.a
At 07:49 AM 6/9/2003, John Maddock wrote:
While putting together bcp (see managing boost dependencies thread), I
found
that some of the boost html files contain relative URL's of that begin
with
./. In order to get filesystem::path to accept these, I had to
manually
strip the ./ off first, so
At 09:12 AM 6/5/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
There've been a fair amount of suggested changes, many of which are
documented on Wiki [1], and since the author himself keeps track of
the issues, I won't reiterate them here - except for stressing the
need for
a)
At 10:48 AM 6/4/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
b) resolving the 'wchar_t' support issue before the library makes into
official Boost distribution.
I'm actually not that happy about solving general issue alone... but let
it
be. I assume I've not asked to implement any
At 01:57 PM 6/8/2003, Gennaro Prota wrote:
On Sun, 8 Jun 2003 15:56:53 +0100, Paul A Bristow
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
If someone would like to do this, I'd be grateful.
(Memories of how to use commandlines and CVS have decayed).
IIUC, the boost sandbox is, so to speak, a more precious resource
At 02:10 AM 6/5/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
On Wednesday, June 4, 2003, at 3:54 PM, Beman Dawes wrote:
Hum... I just had a thought. Is it possible to detect if wchar_t is a
typedef at compile time?
Yes, I think so. Won't boost::is_same unsigned short, wchar_t
::value be true if wchar_t
At 07:58 AM 6/4/2003, John Maddock wrote:
That will certainly work, but you shouldn't have to do that since the
compiler itself defines _WCHAR_T_DEFINED. Since I made the fix earlier
this
afternoon I am able to compile some non-boost code correctly which had
previously be failing.
Just let
At 11:24 AM 6/4/2003, Edward Diener wrote:
I don't know about Intel-Win32 but I brought much of this up regarding
MSVC
7.0+ and most everybody yawned. I am glad that some people have woken up
to
the fact that there is a problem using wide characters with compilers
which
support both the native
This review is based purely on reading the documentation. The code was not
inspected and no tests were run. I also skim read some of the other review
comments.
In general, I like the library and think that it should be accepted by
Boost. But there are a number of issues, and I have the feeling
At 07:02 AM 6/2/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Since I made the fix earlier this afternoon I am able to compile
some non-boost code correctly which had previously be failing.
What fix is that...
Fixes to boost/config/compiler/intel.hpp.
I just did a commit of that file that brings it into sync
At 07:57 PM 6/2/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
I'm going to want to replace the old Boost iterator adaptors
implementation with the new one in the Boost sandbox pretty soon, and
while they are similar in intent and spirit, they have totally
incompatible interfaces. In fact, the new one lives in a
At 10:01 AM 6/2/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
I just checked in changes to the intel-win32-tools.jam file which
enable argument-dependent lookup for all versions, since we were were
incorrectly operating as though it was enabled for v7.1 anyway. I
think we are still out-of-synch with the config,
At 11:12 AM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
I just checked in some improvements to intel-win32 support for
Boost.Build version 1. This includes a hack which works around our
inability to detect wchar_t support for intel6. It also includes
automatic version detection and resulting customization
At 12:09 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Looks much improved, thanks!
Two of the config_info macros look a bit questionable:
I don't know what you mean; I didn't touch the Boost config. All I
did was to edit intel-win32-tools.jam.
Understood. But now
At 02:50 PM 6/1/2003, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm
not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
You may look on test table
http://aspn.activestate.com
At 03:09 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Pavel Vozenilek [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I'll try to trace where BOOST_NO_INTRINSIC_WCHAR_T is being set. I'm
not
so
worried about ADL, at least with VC++ 7.1.
You may look
At 03:08 PM 6/1/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The fresh regression tests are now posted. Here is what changed in the
Intel results, presumably as a result of the intel-win32 changes:
New fails: config/limits_test
integer
C99 has a header fenv.h which provides types, macros, and functions to
provide access to the floating-point environment.
Some Boost code in the Interval Library uses this header, or has to do
workarounds if not present. Metrowerks, GCC, and Dinkumware currently ship
the header, but many others
At 07:15 AM 5/30/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
IMO it's worth to step back and try to answer a couple of big picture
questions:
Yes, that's a good idea.
1) What are the target audiences for the regression test results?
2) What kind of information these audiences are looking to find in
there?
At 12:37 PM 5/28/2003, Stefan Seefeld wrote:
hi there,
I'm trying to load a plugin from the same directory the application was
run from, so I'm doing the following:
int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
//...
fs::path path(argv[0]);
fs::path dir(path.branch_path());
//...
but as soon
At 03:29 PM 5/28/2003, Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test
sources included in regresssion testing? I know some tests are missing
and
some are perhaps as robust as they might be, but it seems some testing is
better than no testing.
At 08:19 PM 5/28/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Eric Friedman wrote:
I apologize if this has already been asked, but why aren't the
libs/mpl/test sources included in regresssion testing? I know some
tests are missing and some are perhaps as robust as they might be,
but it seems some testing is
At 07:04 PM 5/25/2003, Scott Woods wrote:
Is anyone interested in a persistence mechanism?
It isn't clear from you post if you are aware of all the work (including a
formal review) that has already gone into persistence and/or serialization
at Boost. See the archives at
At 11:44 AM 5/27/2003, Peter Dimov wrote:
Chuck Messenger wrote:
For convenience, logical continuity, and consistency with other Boost
libraries, you should be able to include all the smart_ptr pieces with
#include boost/smart_ptr.hpp
Currently, only 4 are included:
#include
Take a look at the new version of
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/. I think the meaning of the
percentages is much clearer now.
Thanks to those who provided suggestions, and to Rene Rivera for the
implementation.
--Beman
___
At 05:04 AM 5/26/2003, Toon Knapen wrote:
The number of warnings also provides valuable information but indeed it's
not as important as the Pass/Fail categories so this needs to be
communicated to the viewers as well. But how ?
I support the suggestion of Greg indicating something like:
Pass:
At 07:31 AM 5/22/2003, John Maddock wrote:
- Detects some regex problems that previously only Metrowerks was
detecting.
Working on it.
Looks like you're making some progress - today's regex tests for Comeau are
looking better:-)
* Shows what looks like a Boost config problem
A last_write_time() function has been added to
boost/filesystem/operations.hpp
It is based on suggestions from Richard Fanta, Ben Hutchings, and Peter
Dimov,
CVS has been updated.
--Beman
___
Unsubscribe other changes:
... various backup suggestions
SourceForge already makes the entire Boost CVS tarball available every
night, and several Boosters download it daily.
(At least I hope they do - I have no way of telling if they are still
running their cron jobs.)
That is supposed to protect us from total
At 11:11 AM 5/8/2003, Darin Adler wrote:
On Thursday, May 8, 2003, at 07:04 AM, Beman Dawes wrote:
A 2-3% timing difference probably isn't reliably repeatable in real
code.
How code and data happens to land in hardware caches can easily swamp
out such a small difference. The version
At 03:21 AM 4/25/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
Beman, if that's fine with you, I'll code them.
Yes, go ahead. Although the concept of extension may be foreign on
some
operating systems, I think the idea is widespread enough to be worth
including. If I understand your
At 12:14 AM 4/27/2003, Trevor Taylor wrote:
So it sounds to me like the :blat is *not* part of the extension. It
sounds like the NT file name is made up of three parts: name, extension
and stream.
In which case I think it is fine to have functions extension() and
change_extension() - they just
At 10:08 AM 4/27/2003, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
Trevor Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So it sounds to me like the :blat is *not* part of the extension. It
sounds like the NT file name is made up of three parts: name, extension
and stream.
In which case I think
At 06:40 PM 4/29/2003, Vaclav Vesely wrote:
This patch allows to compile regression tools with MSVC 6.
First, thanks for going to the effort to work through the various issues.
I have very mixed feelings about the patch. Obviously it is great to extend
the regression reporting tools to work
At 06:10 AM 4/16/2003, Thomas Witt wrote:
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Thomas Witt wrote:
|
| Hi,
|
| When compiling code using iterator_adaptors with vc7.1 I often get
| errors like the following
|
| c\graphmanager_detail.cpp(76) : error C2061: syntax error : identifier
|
At 09:15 AM 4/21/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
Jason House wrote:
Vladimir Prus wrote:
Does those alternate streams belong to filesystem library at all?
For one thing, the ':' symbols is not allowed anywhere except for
root
name. For another thing, on all systems but NTFS, bar.baz.blip:blat
At 10:37 PM 4/20/2003, Edward Diener wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
The idea is that rather than directory iteration returning iterators
for
all path entries, it would only return those which passed a predicate
which was driven by the pattern. For some uses, the pattern might
more flexibly
At 02:28 PM 4/19/2003, Pavel Vozenilek wrote:
b7- ability to distinguish different types of the same dimension (e.g.
width of image and width of screen)
Other examples: It should be an error to try to add gallons of gasoline to
gallons of propane. Not to mention trying to add gallons of
At 02:17 PM 4/20/2003, Edward Diener wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 08:22 AM 4/9/2003, Christian Engström wrote:
In my application I need to handle paths that contain wildcards,
such as for example foo/chapter?.txt or bar/*/index.html.
I think that your need is both valid and commonplace
At 04:01 AM 4/2/2003, k.t. wrote:
And in translating, we found some incorrect expressions in boost
document. We want to report them for feedback, then is it no problem to
report them here? Is boost users mailing list better for it?
This list is probably the best place.
Thanks,
-- Beman
At 09:46 AM 3/29/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I think Alisdair's raised some good points. While I'm not sure
regression testers will want to put a lot of effort into back tests, I
think it would be good if from here on out we segregated current from
past
At 06:30 PM 3/30/2003, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
is it possible to add Comeau to the automatic daily regression testing?
I'm
willing to go through the bugs and prepare patches as needed to fix
compatibility with it.
I've got an action item for the C++ committee meeting next week to corner
Greg
At 04:10 PM 3/28/2003, Rene Rivera wrote:
[2003-03-28] Alisdair Meredith wrote:
For boost 1_29 the Linux regression logs were preserved. For boost 1_30
we have the logs for many more platforms. However, this means that
almost half the logs on the testing page are never going to be updated
and
At 01:28 PM 3/27/2003, Marshall Clow wrote:
On Monday, I attempted to run the Darwin regression tests off the main
branch.
The tools failed to build - specifically process_jam_log failed to
build,
because the filesystem library failed to compile.
In particular,
Kirill wrote:
Given that boost.random does not have an active maintainer, who could
take
a look into this?
There has been some private discussion going on in the background.
Hopefully there will be an announcement within a day or two.
In the meantime, keep posting any fixes here - they are
At 08:04 AM 3/24/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Russell Hind wrote:
I agree with that. Would it be better to make it a millisec_clock, or
just use the microsec_clock but the resolution is only milliseconds?
WinAPI Note: we can get a higher resolution using the
QueryPerformanceCounter API (and
Russell Hind wrote:
Does this help?
I've just run this quickly on my PIII 800 running Win2K SP3 and worse
case for 1,000,000 calls to QueryPerformanceCounter was 1.92seconds,
usually between 1.55 and 1.65 seconds (10 runs).
LARGE_INTEGER Start, End, Temp;
QueryPerformanceCounter(Start);
In many ways the preparation Boost 1.30.0 went very well, and the resulting
release seems very high quality to me.
There were rough edges of course, and we'll try to make some improvements
in coming months. Mostly just procedural stuff like making sure we have an
active maintainer for all
Russell Hind wrote:
I've just run this quickly on my PIII 800 running Win2K SP3 and worse
case for 1,000,000 calls to QueryPerformanceCounter was 1.92seconds,
usually between 1.55 and 1.65 seconds (10 runs).
I tied it on a 1.8 giga-hertz Pentium 4M, running XP Pro, with very similar
results:
At 05:47 PM 3/24/2003, Lapshin, Kirill wrote:
The interesting part that it fails to compile even when there is no
instantiation of the template.
In random library this assertion is within #ifndef
BOOST_NO_LIMITS_COMPILE_TIME_CONSTANTS #endif directives.
That makes no sense. That macro is
At 01:11 PM 3/21/2003, Neal D. Becker wrote:
I have built SRPMS for RH8 for boost1.30.0. They required just minor
modifications to the spec files. Where should I upload them?
Should that be part of the regular Boost distribution, and thus live in
CVS? If so, would you be willing to maintain
At 01:58 PM 3/21/2003, William E. Kempf wrote:
Until we have a more formal installation solution, I think the SRPM's
spec
file should reside in CVS. It would also be nice to have other
installation options as well, such as Debian packages (sorrry, not
totally
familiar with the terminology to
At 05:58 AM 3/20/2003, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
- Original Message -
From: David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: Boost mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 20, 2003 4:06 AM
Subject: Re: [boost] Boost::format, MSVC, BOOST_TESTED_AT
Great! Why don't you check in a
Boost version 1.30.0 has been released. The highlights include:
* Filesystem Library added - Portable paths, iteration over directories,
and other useful filesystem operations, from Beman Dawes.
* Optional Library added - A discriminated-union wrapper for optional
values, from Fernando
At 01:06 PM 3/20/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Boost version 1.30.0 has been released. The highlights include:
snip no mention of Boost.Python
What did I do wrong? I established a news page in my docs; I thought
that was the way to go these days
At 02:21 PM 3/20/2003, Rozental, Gennadiy wrote:
Date-Time Change History is missing
It isn't in CVS either. And if it isn't in CVS, it doesn't go in the
release. The release is really just an export of CVS as of
the release tag.
Nothing gets added, nothing gets subtracted.
--Beman
My
At 03:13 AM 3/19/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
Ok, it seems we may have to exclude wide character support for
lexical_cast
on MSVC 6, to avoid breaking Date/Time. I suggest something like:
#if defined(BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM) || \
defined(BOOST_NO_STD_WSTRING) || \
At 08:06 AM 3/19/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Russell Hind wrote:
Does anybody know if this needs fixing, or is it my mistake. If it
needs fixing, is someone able to do it before 1.30.0 is released?
Yes, I think it needs fixing!
Unless others disagree strongly, this should be held for the
At 08:54 AM 3/19/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
I don't know how close the release schedule is now, but if we could at
least change the version check from 0x0561 to 0x0564 that would be
extrely useful.
This would make the difference between our being able to use boost 1_30
'out-the-box' (as I
Please speak up now if you have any uncommitted RC_1_30_0 changes or other
problems.
Otherwise we will tag for release at 3 PM US Eastern Time (20:00 UTC).
--Beman
___
Unsubscribe other changes: http://lists.boost.org/mailman/listinfo.cgi/boost
At 09:35 AM 3/19/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Alisdair Meredith wrote:
I am currently doing a search for other places where borland v 0x0561
is
assumed, as I don't think the latest patch fixed any issues that would
affect boost and it would be a shame to have to choose between boost
and
At 12:52 PM 3/19/2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
Please speak up now if you have any uncommitted RC_1_30_0 changes or
other
problems.
Otherwise we will tag for release at 3 PM US Eastern Time (20:00 UTC).
Currently holding waiting for resolution of Boost.Python link problem.
Also, CVS is running so
At 04:35 PM 3/19/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
I see from the CVS that the above has only been put in the header, not
the
test, as well. It needs to be in both. If it's just in the header, it'll
try
the wide character tests - on a header that has wide character
conversions
disabled - a recipe for
At 04:36 PM 3/19/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Beman Dawes [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At 12:52 PM 3/19/2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
Please speak up now if you have any uncommitted RC_1_30_0 changes or
other
problems.
Otherwise we will tag for release at 3 PM US Eastern Time (20:00
UTC
At 05:40 PM 3/19/2003, Joel de Guzman wrote:
Spirit version 1.5.2 will also have to be bumped to 1.6.0 (the
final release version). By convention, odd numbered minor
versions are developmental. The final release will have the
version change. The patches do not affect the code.
Unless there is
At 07:25 AM 3/18/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
At 07:17 AM 3/17/2003, Thomas Witt wrote:
the library name is still fs. I was under the impression that this
was
only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
boost_filesystem before release. From
At 09:48 AM 3/18/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
it seems to me that these aren't actually legal specializations
(though I've never specialized functions before so I could be wrong).
Shouldn't that be:
template
inline type_info
At 03:48 PM 3/18/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Terje Slettebø [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
- With wide character support in lexical_cast enabled for MSVC 6, three
tests (of 137) fail. These are omitted for that compiler version, using
BOOST_WORKAROUND and BOOST_TESTED_AT.
You shouldn't be using
At 04:42 PM 3/18/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(lexical_castint( 123), boost::bad_lexical_cast);
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(lexical_castint(std::string( 123)),
boost::bad_lexical_cast);
BOOST_CHECK_THROW(lexical_castbool(123), boost::bad_lexical_cast);
If these are omitted for g++ 2.95.x,
A fresh version of the Win32 regression tests has just been posted. See
http://boost.sourceforge.net/regression-logs/cs-win32-RC_1_30_0-diff.html
There are seven new fails in date_time tests; presumably all caused by
lexical_cast.hpp problems. See typical error message below.
--Beman
At 01:38 AM 3/17/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
I finally got simple_ls to compile and link.
The build now correctly builds two libraries (one release, one debug) and
if you point to the right place (shouldn't there be some way to marshall
the libraries instead of leaving them scattered
At 10:40 PM 3/16/2003, Giovanni Bajo wrote:
Could this patch be accepted in time for 1.30.0? I asked yesterday for a
fix to array.hpp that allows it to be used when exceptions are disabled,
and this looks legit to me.
The change looks innocuous to me. Would anyone object if I go ahead an
apply
At 07:14 AM 3/17/2003, John Maddock wrote:
* [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
Awaiting response from John Maddock.
(Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
for it.)
That one will have to wait - gcc 3.3 hasn't been
At 08:16 AM 3/17/2003, David Abrahams wrote:
Still looks broken over here:
http://cci.lbl.gov/boost/results/1047901021/dailylog_win32_vc60
We are still waiting for SourceForge to clear an errant lock. It can't be
fixed until then.
--Beman
___
At 07:17 AM 3/17/2003, Thomas Witt wrote:
the library name is still fs. I was under the impression that this was
only temporary and should be changed to a more boost compatible
boost_filesystem before release. From a pratical point of view fs
seems like begging for a nameclash.
Good point.
OK,
At 12:27 PM 3/17/2003, Joaquín Mª López Muñoz wrote:
Jeff Garland ha escrito:
OK, so how I ask for preliminary review? Posting a mail here?
Yes, you can just ask for preliminary feedback on this list.
Another thing you can do is put the code in the boost-sandbox.
This helps get things
At 03:40 PM 3/17/2003, Terje Slettebø wrote:
Well, I think this reinforces the suggestion to define
BOOST_NO_STRINGSTREAM
for 2.95.x. Comments?
Either that, or to have some way to detect where
std::basic_stringstream
is not supported, and turn off wide character support for that, in
At 06:51 PM 3/17/2003, Malcolm Smith wrote:
I just compiled the regex library under C++Builder 5.
I've tried to compile an application and it complains about not being
able
to find STLPMT.LIB - I can find no information on this LIB.
That's not a Boost library. It's a Borland library. On my
At 09:50 AM 3/14/2003, Keith Burton wrote:
Please see http://www.boost.org/more/download.html#CVS
From this page :
free GUI clients are also available for Windows, Mac, and other systems
from CvsGui.org.
The link to cvsgui.org goes to somewhere that appears to be not longer
valid
Yes, a
At 09:30 AM 3/14/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
I appreciate the difficulties in getting a release out.
I _am_ puzzled about what behavior you wish people (who use (all | any)
of
boost regularly) to use in validating problems they may encounter (most
of
the time boost is in a constant state
At 07:00 AM 3/16/2003, John Maddock wrote:
My sincere apologies over the is_class fiasco: those changes were never
meant to be checked in. I've being trying all morning to revert to the
earlier version, but all I'm seeing is:
cvs server: [03:56:46] waiting for johnmaddock's lock in
At 01:57 AM 3/16/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
Ok, I finally got all the junk straightened out. got a clean update for
the RC instead of the mainline, and guess what?
It looks like it cannot find ANY functions that purportedly are defined
in
filesystem.
oh, compilerVC7.1
--
At 06:13 PM 3/16/2003, Andreas Huber wrote:
Beman John,
Both the main trunk and RC_1_30_0 are working fine for me as of Sunday
6PM
US Eastern time.
Douglas Gregor has already fixed the is_class.hpp problem, please see
http://lists.boost.org/MailArchives/boost/msg45230.php
Today's Win32
Here is the current list. The second and third items look to me like
showstoppers.
--Beman
* [Boost.Regex] [PATCH] Fix GCC 3.3 warnings from Lars Gullik Bjønnes.
Awaiting response from John Maddock.
(Since this one just eliminates warnings, the release won't be held
for it.)
*
At 08:17 PM 3/16/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
Agreed, something is amiss. I've read the docs several times and all
they
seem to say is everything is in the template includes.
Filesystem Library components are supplied by several headers, all in
directory boost/filesystem:
my #includes
At 09:20 PM 3/16/2003, Aleksey Gurtovoy wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
Both the main trunk and RC_1_30_0 are working fine for me as
of Sunday 6PM US Eastern time.
I was unclear; the CVS lock problem was cleared, not the is_class problems.
Today's Win32 RC_1_30_0 regression tests (just posted
At 11:00 PM 3/13/2003, Victor A. Wagner, Jr. wrote:
for the past 3 hours I've been getting:
...failed updating 300 targets...
...skipped 117 targets...
...updated 8 targets...
when trying to make the latest CVS update:
date /T update.log
time /t update.log
cvs -z3 update -A -P -d update.log
At 04:02 AM 3/13/2003, Vladimir Prus wrote:
I believe that Malte Starostik is the right person for dealing with this
issue. I'm pretty sure the different is naming is difference between
Mandrake and Redhat, but have no idea how to fix it.
And, while we're on it, I think it would be much better
At 10:51 AM 3/12/2003, Jaakko Jarvi wrote:
On Wed, 12 Mar 2003, Beman Dawes wrote:
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if
we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
* tuples::apply
Did this every get resolved? Aleksey? Jaakko?
Aleksey's message
At 02:24 AM 3/13/2003, Daryle Walker wrote:
4. My testing was with a stock Boost 1.29.0 from a zip file. If the
CVS version of Boost already has fixes for CW-DS and/or CWP8.3, I'll
switch to that and apologize for wasting everyone's time.
Daryle, with all the current focus on 1.30.0, I'm not
At 11:52 AM 3/12/2003, Alisdair Meredith wrote:
I have also reported and not seen rejected:
(easily lost in the volume surrounding a release)
[2 Random fixes also required for Graph]
===
RCS file:
At 11:42 AM 3/12/2003, Sam Partington wrote:
Daniel Frey wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
* Possible addition to operators library from Sam Partington
Daniel Frey and Sam discussing changes.
We need some discussion of it and I would like to see it in CVS and
thus in the regression tests
At 07:59 AM 3/13/2003, John Maddock wrote:
* Regex make boost work better patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Maddock will investigate once new machine working
should be done soon.
OK.
* PRB with type_traits::is_member_function_pointer
Would prefer John Maddock or someone else more
Here is the current list:
* lexical_cast problems.
Hold changes for next release?
* Regex make boost work better patch from Lars Gullik Bjønnes
John Maddock says he will apply soon.
* [status/Jamfile] Jamfile patches for Borland
Dave says factor commonality out into template.
Too late
At 10:58 AM 3/13/2003, Daniel Frey wrote:
Beman Dawes wrote:
* Daniel Frey: provided a fix for some warnings in the type-traits
(is_class/is_enum IIRC), John Maddock is aware of it AFAIK.
Just to remove any doubts: This should not be a show-stopper. The
warnings are in there for quite some
Kevlin has done an update that incorporates the overloading fix and is
less permissive about which platforms will get wide character support.
The Win32 tests are now looking as good or better than with the old 1.29.0
version. See
Here is my list of outstanding patches and fixes. It would be great if we
could resolve the bulk of these for 1.30.0.
If you resolve any of these issues, please let me know so I can clear it
off the list.
Thanks,
--Beman
* lexical_cast changes
Kevlin and Terje doing final tests on changes.
At 11:19 PM 3/11/2003, Douglas Gregor wrote:
As it stands, the system itself is in good shape, and the documentation
for
libraries I've redocumented in BoostBook is quite reasonably. I still
think
a BoostBook overview/tutorial at Oxford would be beneficial.
Let's plan on it. Would Sunday
At 07:41 AM 2/13/2003, Fredrik Blomqvist wrote:
boost::is_polymorphic documentation is written in a slightly larger font
than the rest of the items and there's also a spelling error
('magority')
in the following text.
Fixed. Thanks!
--Beman
___
At 07:11 AM 3/12/2003, Markus Schöpflin wrote:
Markus Schöpflin wrote:
currently the constructors test of the multi array library fails for
VACPP6. This is due to the fact that the test uses an unsigned int
where
a size_type should be used.
The attached patch replaces the unsigned int with
201 - 300 of 535 matches
Mail list logo
