Jeff Garland [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
I think this is a good addition, but we should probably make the
addition for all Win32 compilers since I think this is actually
part of the Win32 api.
I agree with that. Would it be better to make it a
Russell Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Alisdair Meredith wrote:
Russell Hind wrote:
I agree with that. Would it be better to make it a millisec_clock, or
just use the microsec_clock but the resolution is only milliseconds?
WinAPI Note: we can get a
Russell Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Nilsson wrote:
I might be a bit off here (coming in late into the discussion), but I'd
prefer consistency in my code; using microsec_clock for both Windows and
Unix code - even if the real 'resolution
Russell Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Nilsson wrote:
Can these be used to get an actual date/time though? Or just for high
resolution timing? I've only had a brief look at them, so will read a
bit more.
Yes and yes. But the former (using them
Russell Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Nilsson wrote:
Yes, but why not have both on all platforms?
It would make using it cross-platform easier, but you aren't actually
getting microsecond information under windows, so if your program relies
Russell Hind [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Nilsson wrote:
Perhaps, but one should consider that GetSystemTime promises 1ms
resolution
and delivers 10-15ms (and, IIRC, that GetSystemTimeAsFileTime promises
250ns resolution).
The Platform SDK states
Terje Slettebø [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
082701c2a12f$15c74170$60fb5dd5@pc">news:082701c2a12f$15c74170$60fb5dd5@pc...
From: Eric Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
at76e1$2ro$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:at76e1$2ro$[EMAIL PROTECTE
Eric Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
at7kru$5v7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:at7kru$5v7$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
at76e1$2ro$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:at76e1$2ro$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Eric Woodruff [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in
[I've tried posting this to c.l.c++.m, but to no success. Don't know if it's
due to some of the assert code looking like html markup ;-) or whatever.
Anyway, I thought this might also be a good forum.]
Hi,
this is an experiment I just tried out. I've only tried it with VC7, and it
doesn't work
Terje Slettebø [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
00e001c2a04e$92f9c190$60fb5dd5@pc">news:00e001c2a04e$92f9c190$60fb5dd5@pc...
From: Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The hack makes no 'fixed' assumptions on binary object
layout, rather, it relies on the fact that any polymorphic
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
A rather lengthy example with no comments or explanatory text
describing what it's
David Abrahams [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev i meddelandet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
[cross-posted, but it seemed appropriate]
Hi,
just wanted to bring this one up: I've come across some problems putting
boost source to an
Gennadiy Rozental [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
askekp$fm9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:askekp$fm9$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Johan Nilsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote in message
askatu$v5u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:askatu$v5u$[EMAIL PROTECTED]...
Well,
[snip]
If anyone intere
Darryl Green [EMAIL PROTECTED] skrev i meddelandet
[EMAIL PROTECTED]">news:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
...
[snip]
Note man says regular files - there are lots of interesting special
files that don't always
report ready - I/O devices, pipes etc. Also, I think it would be a bad
idea to assume
that
14 matches
Mail list logo
