Grant,
In section 4.2, the /Firmware directory is mentioned. What are the reasons why
this new hierarchy of directories are created? Can we not use the existing /EFI
hierarchy as shown at http://www.uefi.org/registry? I may have missed the
rational when discussed.
If we do need to create a new
On 09/07/2018 18:54, Dong Wei wrote:
Grant,
In section 4.2, the /Firmware directory is mentioned. What are the reasons why
this new hierarchy of directories are created? Can we not use the existing /EFI
hierarchy as shown at http://www.uefi.org/registry? I may have missed the
rational when di
ikely
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 11:17 AM
To: Dong Wei ; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org;
arm.ebbr-discuss
Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss] EBBR v0.6-pre1 Released
On 09/07/2018 18:54, Dong Wei wrote:
> Grant,
>
> In section 4.2, the /Firmware directory is mentioned. What are the reaso
Hi Grant
Few comments
1/ 1.1 Introduction
>For example, an Arm A-class embedded networking platform
to
>For example, an Arm A-class embedded platform
2/ 1.2 Guiding Principals
>EBBR as a specification defines requirements
to
>EBBR as a specification define requirements
3.1/ 1.3 Scope
Pleas
he request is legit. Sometimes vendors may
need to change the proposed name if it collides with the existing one.
- DW
-
-Original Message-
From: Grant Likely
Sent: Monday, July 9, 2018 11:17 AM
To: Dong Wei ; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org; arm.ebbr-discuss
Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-dis
On 11/07/2018 06:33, Udit Kumar wrote:
Hi Grant
Few comments
1/ 1.1 Introduction
For example, an Arm A-class embedded networking platform
to
For example, an Arm A-class embedded platform
done
2/ 1.2 Guiding Principals
EBBR as a specification defines requirements
to
EBBR as a specif
> -Original Message-
> From: Grant Likely [mailto:grant.lik...@arm.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 12, 2018 1:33 AM
> To: Udit Kumar ; boot-architecture@lists.linaro.org;
> arm.ebbr-discuss
> Cc: Ben Eckermann ; Varun Sethi
>
> Subject: Re: [Arm.ebbr-discuss]
