Bill Ricker wrote:
> ...we may make that an ongoing exemption from
> moderation of job-posting in boston-pm for perhaps those trustees with
> unmoderated boston-pm-announce privileges, not just Uri -- revocable
> for violations of above 1-3. Discuss.
That sounds fair. The objective of moderation
On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Uri Guttman wrote:
> i sent ronald a job posting but he hasn't forwarded to the list yet. i know
> ronald and bob clancy are the two who approved those. are they both still
> interested in doing this? i wouldn't mind a bit of quicker response as some
> of my
hi all,
i sent ronald a job posting but he hasn't forwarded to the list yet. i
know ronald and bob clancy are the two who approved those. are they both
still interested in doing this? i wouldn't mind a bit of quicker
response as some of my leads are time sensitive. would anyone else want
the
:Per discussion offlist between the Outgoing Facilitator and the
Incoming Facilitator, there is
NO CHANGE
in the Boston.PM Job Posting policy
(previously adopted by vote at a meeting whenver Rondald said it was.)
In particular, the screening address remains Ronald's [EMAIL PROTECTED]
As part of
I can see the potential conflict in interest in having someone who does
recruiting work handling the job postings. Obviously it is a concern to
some of our members.
Very few job postings I received were rejected. I often send them back to
the submitter for additional info. I reformatted most
>>>>> "AL" == Andrew Langmead <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
AL> There are a couple of other ways that an evil headhunter who was in
AL> charge of the boston.pm job postings could use the position to their
AL> own private advantage. (I'm not talking
> "TM" == Tom Metro <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
TM> OK, seems we have three votes for self-moderation...in other matters...
TM> Ben Tilly wrote:
>> ...regularly make a post listing any recent jobs.perl.org offerings
>> in the Boston area. The more I think about it, the better that
> "CD" == Chris Devers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
CD> On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Uri Guttman wrote:
>> if someone else really wants to do it, fine with me but no one has
>> piped up about it.
CD> Oh fer cryin' out loud, how hard can it be?
CD> The conflict of interest here is obvious.
per acquisition is low.
> Unless they are really clued in to Boston.PM, they will not know that
> Uri is a headhunter. If they are clued in, they know enough about Uri
> to not worry. Where is the problem?
There are a couple of other ways that an evil headhunter who was in
charge of the b
On Sun, 29 Jun 2008, Uri Guttman wrote:
> if someone else really wants to do it, fine with me but no one has
> piped up about it.
Oh fer cryin' out loud, how hard can it be?
The conflict of interest here is obvious. Sorry, Uri, but there's no
getting around it. Fox guarding the henhouse and
OK, seems we have three votes for self-moderation...in other matters...
Ben Tilly wrote:
> ...regularly make a post listing any recent jobs.perl.org offerings
> in the Boston area. The more I think about it, the better that option
> looks. Particularly if you can write an automated script to
On Mon, 2008-06-30 at 19:20 -0400, Bob Rogers wrote:
> From: "Ricker, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>Or we could consider a change of policy to just allow posting (with same
>caveat of locality and relevance), thus avoiding the issue entirely.
>
>Bill
>
> That makes much more sense.
From: "Ricker, William" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2008 14:06:25 -0400
> i may be evil but not THAT evil! :)
Uri, it's not about any actual evil. I would really really like to say
Yes to your kind offer. But Sean and I have to worry about the
*perception* of evil
> "RW" == Ricker, William <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
RW> Sorry Uri, but unless you were to swear off taking fees from *all* local
RW> business (which I can neither ask, nor suggest nor expect), I think we
RW> need to have someone else, someone who *appears* *objectively* neutral,
RW>
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:39 AM, Ben Tilly <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
[...]
> Unless they are really clued in to Boston.PM, they will not know that
> Uri is a headhunter. If they are clued in, they know enough about Uri
> to not worry. Where is the problem? I would suggest not worrying
> about
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 02:38:02PM -0400, Tom Metro wrote:
> As long as we provide a contact person that posters can consult with on
> questionable items, self-moderation will probably be fine.
I support this model. It seems fairly simple. Given that the purpose of
moderation is to avoid abuse,
William Ricker wrote:
> Or we could consider a change of policy to just allow posting (with same
> caveat of locality and relevance), thus avoiding the issue entirely.
Practically speaking, the list isn't moderated, so any job poster who is
conscientious enough to read the list policy and
ppear.
Greg London
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] on behalf of Ben Tilly
Sent: Mon 6/30/2008 2:39 PM
To: Ricker, William
Cc: boston-pm@mail.pm.org; Sean Quinlan; Uri Guttman
Subject: Re: [Boston.pm] job postings
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ricker, Willi
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 11:06 AM, Ricker, William
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> i may be evil but not THAT evil! :)
>
> Uri, it's not about any actual evil. I would really really like to say
> Yes to your kind offer. But Sean and I have to worry about the
> *perception* of evil even where it
> i may be evil but not THAT evil! :)
Uri, it's not about any actual evil. I would really really like to say
Yes to your kind offer. But Sean and I have to worry about the
*perception* of evil even where it isn't.
Local companies, some of whom sponsor Boston.PM, expect postings to the
list
> "BR" == Bob Rogers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
BR>From: Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
BR>Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:22:22 -0400
BR>Uri, as you offer professional recruiting services, I'm afraid this
BR>might be a significant conflict of interests.
BR>-Sean
From: Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Sun, 29 Jun 2008 11:22:22 -0400
Uri, as you offer professional recruiting services, I'm afraid this
might be a significant conflict of interests.
-Sean
This thought occurred to me, too, but I tend to agree with Uri. The
only real
> "SQ" == Sean Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
SQ> Uri, as you offer professional recruiting services, I'm afraid this
SQ> might be a significant conflict of interests.
i would disagree. i don't compete with other listings nor do i care. the
more listings the better is my view. i
Uri, as you offer professional recruiting services, I'm afraid this
might be a significant conflict of interests.
-Sean
On Thu, 2008-06-26 at 16:53 -0400, Uri Guttman wrote:
> hi all,
>
> now that ronald has retired, one of his jobs that needs to be filled is
> handling job postings here. i
hi all,
now that ronald has retired, one of his jobs that needs to be filled is
handling job postings here. i would like to volunteer for that task
especially as i am already in that business. i will adhere to the same
rules which is that the jobs must be perl-centric and in the boston area
and
25 matches
Mail list logo
