On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 14:10, Larry Underhill wrote:
> Worth noting that my perl version on RHEL 3.0 is 5.8.0 (with a pile o'
> patches -- makes sense). Haven't checked out RHEL 4 yet, but I would
> assume that they are running a more recent version since the Fedora Core
> 3 box I am typing this
Worth noting that my perl version on RHEL 3.0 is 5.8.0 (with a pile o'
patches -- makes sense). Haven't checked out RHEL 4 yet, but I would
assume that they are running a more recent version since the Fedora Core
3 box I am typing this from uses perl 5.8.5.
Oh, and the real way to answer your
On Fri, May 20, 2005 at 01:05:22PM -0400, Aaron Sherman wrote:
> On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:27, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
> > I seem to recall that the perl5.8.1 that comes with Red Hat is not the same
> > as the official release of perl5.8.1. Anyone know where I can find out
> > more information
On Fri, 2005-05-20 at 10:27, Ronald J Kimball wrote:
> I seem to recall that the perl5.8.1 that comes with Red Hat is not the same
> as the official release of perl5.8.1. Anyone know where I can find out
> more information about this?
Well, for starters, you might want to narrow down what you
I seem to recall that the perl5.8.1 that comes with Red Hat is not the same
as the official release of perl5.8.1. Anyone know where I can find out
more information about this?
thanks,
Ronald
P.S. Sorry for not having a tech meeting in May. I'm coordinating with
Sean to schedule one for June.
5 matches
Mail list logo
