Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with Robin Hood.

2009-08-10 Thread tshipley
- From: Matt Grimaldi Date: Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:22:29 To: Killer Bs \(David Brin et al\) Discussion Subject: Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with Robin Hood. That falls in with IAAMOAC. There are dues to pay when you are a member. -- Matt

Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with Robin Hood.

2009-08-07 Thread Matt Grimaldi
That falls in with IAAMOAC. There are dues to pay when you are a member. -- Matt - Original Message From: David Hobby To: Killer Bs (David Brin et al) Discussion Sent: Friday, August 7, 2009 5:11:02 PM Subject: Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with

Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with Robin Hood.

2009-08-07 Thread David Hobby
Trent Shipley wrote: ... The moral principle that "taxes are theft" suffers from a similar limitation. Logically taxes ARE theft. Newspeak! I stand behind this. When theft is understood as any taking, except as punishment, then taxes are logically a form of theft. It's a logical

Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with Robin Hood.

2009-08-07 Thread Trent Shipley
While writing this I tried to imagine how a certain kind of libertarian thought about the world. It is a shallow exercise in participant observation. To appreciate what I wrote you must at least partially empathize with our libertarian subject. Nick Arnett wrote: > On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:42 P

Re: Br!n: Libertarian Morality--Up with good King John, down with Robin Hood.

2009-08-07 Thread Nick Arnett
On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 7:42 PM, Trent Shipley wrote: > > It started me thinking about the bases of libertarianism and American > conservatism. Previously when I had thought of libertarianism, I had > not thought of it as particularly based in a moral principle. Good for you... it's not, IMO.