William T Goodall wrote:
Religion is about crazy people blowing stuff up.
Sorry, can't agree.
*Intolerance* and *fanaticism* often involve crazy people blowing stuff
up, not religion. To insist on equating religion with violence is a
form of intolerance in itself, and to have a statement like
> From: Dave Land <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> William T Goodall wrote:
>
> > Religion is about crazy people blowing stuff up.
>
> Sorry, can't agree.
>
> *Intolerance* and *fanaticism* often involve crazy people blowing stuff
> up, not religion. To insist on equating religion with violence is a
On Fri, Mar 12, 2004 at 02:27:25AM -0600, The Fool wrote:
> Religion is a disease that destroys critical thinking abilities. Frex
> JDG.
While I tend to agree about JDG, I can't help but wonder what disease
destroyed your critical thinking abilities?
--
Erik Reuter http://www.erikreuter.net
At 02:27 AM 3/12/04, The Fool wrote:
Genocide after Genocide, war, dog killing people for thought crimes, dog
killing people for every reason, [...] Tribalism/Religion inspires
people to commit genocide and conspiracies to commit genocide. It
inspires them to amass so much power that they are cap
ype
for real this time?The topic of program emulation is not something
that will light a fire in many peoples hearts, or put a spark in
their eyes. But run the topic by IT professionals and youll likely
see a glimmer of hopefollowed by a dismissive wave. Theyre enchanted
by the promise of the tec
Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
http://www.click2houston.com/technology/3741612/detail.html?treets=hou&tml=hou_digs&ts=T&tmi=hou_digs_1_03150110042004
http://tinyurl.com/3l93o
...Quick Transit, that it claims “allows software applications compiled for one processor and operating system to run on anothe
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
> Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
>
>>
http://www.click2houston.com/technology/3741612/detail.html?treets=hou&tml=hou_digs&ts=T&tmi=hou_digs_1_03150110042004
>>
>>
>> http://tinyurl.com/3l93o
>>
>>
>> ...Quick Transit, that it claims allows software applications
>> co
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sonja van Baardwijk-Holten wrote:
Robert G. Seeberger wrote:
http://www.click2houston.com/technology/3741612/detail.html?treets=hou&tml=hou_digs&ts=T&tmi=hou_digs_1_03150110042004
http://tinyurl.com/3l93o
...Quick Transit, that it claims "allows software applica
> "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Rather than talk about the human morality of killing
> humans, I am
> curious how many on this list think that it is
> morally good to emulate a `higher being'?
That depends on whether the 'higher being' _is_
morally goodMost of the reason
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, March 16, 2004 4:57 PM
Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> > Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTEC
On 11 Mar 2004, at 10:06 pm, Deborah Harrell wrote:
"Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Rather than talk about the human morality of killing
humans, I am
curious how many on this list think that it is
morally good to emulate a `higher being'?
That depends on whether the 'higher being
From: William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 01:23:03 +
On 11 Mar 2004, at 10:06 pm, Deborah Harrell
> William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >> "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Rather than talk about the human morality of
> >>killing humans, I am
> >> curious how many on this list think that it is
> >> morally good to emulate a `higher
At 03:25 PM 3/12/04, Deborah Harrell wrote:
> William T Goodall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Deborah Harrell wrote:
> >> "Robert J. Chassell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >> Rather than talk about the human morality of
> >>killing humans, I am
> >> curious how many on this list think that it
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:25 PM
Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> Democrats 'sex-crazed
> pantywa
Robert Seeberger wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 3:25 PM
> Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amend
- Original Message -
From: "Julia Thompson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, March 12, 2004 9:26 PM
Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
> >
> >
From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendment)
Date: Fri, 12 Mar 2004 21:43:28 -0600
- Original Messag
Jon Gabriel wrote:
>
> >From: "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >Subject: Re: Emulation (was: Federal Marriage Amendmen
> From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> Then there's the trick where you remove your underwear
> without removing
> the shorts you're wearing over them. If you're not wearing
underwear,
> you can't do that trick. :)
I've seen that one with a bra but not with underwear. How does
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 04:21:38PM -0600, Horn, John wrote:
> From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Then there's the trick where you remove your underwear without
> > removing the shorts you're wearing over them. If you're not wearing
> > underwear, you can't do that trick. :)
> I'v
"Horn, John" wrote:
>
> > From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Then there's the trick where you remove your underwear
> > without removing
> > the shorts you're wearing over them. If you're not wearing
> underwear,
> > you can't do that trick. :)
>
> I've seen that one with a
> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > From: "Deborah Harrell"
> > Democrats 'sex-crazed pantywaists.' :P
> Shouldn't the "sex crazed" have their panties 'round
> their knees? At the least?
Ro-BER-er-ert!
Now that's taking snippage too far! You've given some
brand-new brineller th
On 3/16/04 8:12 PM, "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now you know why the leading causes of teen pregnancy are bathrooms
> and open windows, and why younger neoconservatives resemble older
> progressives. Its also why Ann Coulter is so mean. If you had to get a
> full wax every othe
Matthew and Julie Bos wrote:
>
> On 3/16/04 8:12 PM, "Robert Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Now you know why the leading causes of teen pregnancy are bathrooms
> > and open windows, and why younger neoconservatives resemble older
> > progressives. Its also why Ann Coulter is so mean.
full of attitude too.
> > And _boy_ did this thread sink to the gutter
> > fast...that really was _not_ my intention... :P
> No, it was mine. You are absolved. Dominus vobiscum.
Well, I actually *was* interested in hearing other
opinions on the emulation bit...you thread-hijacker!
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, March 17, 2004 6:44 PM
Subject: Re: Sex Crazed Pantywaists (was:Re: Emulation)
> > Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTE
"Horn, John" wrote:
>
> > From: Julia Thompson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > Then there's the trick where you remove your underwear
> > without removing
> > the shorts you're wearing over them. If you're not wearing
> underwear,
> > you can't do that trick. :)
>
> I've seen that one with a
On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 05:05:27PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
> I'd put my bare foot up to my butt, work the underwear down around the
> foot, and then pull down to get it over the knee. Getting the second
> leg out was then a fairly trivial exercise.
Hmm, I don't think my underwear or my leg
Erik Reuter wrote:
>
> On Sat, Mar 13, 2004 at 05:05:27PM -0600, Julia Thompson wrote:
>
> > I'd put my bare foot up to my butt, work the underwear down around the
> > foot, and then pull down to get it over the knee. Getting the second
> > leg out was then a fairly trivial exercise.
>
> Hmm, I
30 matches
Mail list logo
