RE: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-02-19 Thread Nick Lidster
Fred and Barney should be banned because they are virtually inseparable, are never seen wearing pants and live together in the suggestively-named town of Bedrock, complains a conservative activist http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/6934878/site/newsweek The ongoing campaign against alleged gay icons

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-02-19 Thread Robert Seeberger
Nick Lidster wrote: > > LOL seriously how many people here are uncomfortable with > homosexuality? Some of these people would get a rude awakening if one > of their kids were gay though they would cite the "Flintstones" > as being the cause of their child's preference.. LOL > There may be one

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-02-19 Thread Medievalbk
In a message dated 2/19/2005 8:30:03 A.M. US Mountain Standard Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Fred and Barney should be banned because they are virtually inseparable, are never seen wearing pants and live together in the suggestively-named town of Bedrock, complains a conservative activist

RE: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-02-19 Thread Julia Thompson
On Sat, 19 Feb 2005, Nick Lidster wrote: > I guess if a time machine existed, he would demand that police officers > go back in time and give tickets to persons that were naked, for > indecent exposure .. when everyone is naked.LOL. The Live in a > Town called bed rock h perhaps

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-02-19 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Feb 19, 2005, at 9:21 AM, Robert Seeberger wrote: As I see things, fear of homosexuals is a function of a lack of sexual self confidence. A guy hears other fellows bragging about their [purported] sexual conquests and feats, and knowing he has not himself accomplished as much in the sexual arena

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-10 Thread Deborah Harrell
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > >Fred and Barney should be banned because they are > >virtually > >inseparable, are never seen wearing pants and live > >together in the > >suggestively-named town of Bedrock, complains a > >conservative activist... > And everybody si

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Gary Denton
On Thu, 10 Mar 2005 14:14:35 -0800 (PST), Deborah Harrell <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > >Fred and Barney should be banned because they are > > >virtually > > >inseparable, are never seen wearing pants and live > > >together in the > >

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Mar 11, 2005, at 2:46 PM, Gary Denton wrote: I actually have some pictures of the Flintstones and the Rubbles swinging. This is so vastly into the realm of "oversharing" that it's actually downright spooky. -- Warren Ockrassa, Publisher/Editor, nightwares Books http://books.nightwares.com/ Cu

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread David Hobby
A search for Flintstone's porn reveala little in gay themes but quite a lot of other. (What would we do without search engines?) Gary Denton You know, I never would have thought to look. ---David What would we do WITH search engines?

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
On Fri, 11 Mar 2005, David Hobby wrote: > > > A search for Flintstone's porn reveala little in gay themes but quite > > a lot of other. > > > > (What would we do without search engines?) > > > > Gary Denton > > You know, I never would have thought to look. > > ---David

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:19 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Also, attempt to find menus for Chinese restaurants. (I didn't realize the restaurant reviewer's page for the restaurant was likely the only place that linked to an on-line copy of the menu until someone pointed it out to me. And now I'm debatin

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:19 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Also, attempt to find menus for Chinese restaurants. (I didn't realize the restaurant reviewer's page for the restaurant was likely the only place that linked to an on-line copy of the menu until someone pointed it out to me

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Mar 11, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:19 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Also, attempt to find menus for Chinese restaurants. (I didn't realize the restaurant reviewer's page for the restaurant was likely the only place that linked to an on-line

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Mar 11, 2005, at 9:17 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Mar 11, 2005, at 8:19 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Also, attempt to find menus for Chinese restaurants. (I didn't realize the restaurant reviewer's page for the restaurant was likely the only place tha

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Warren Ockrassa
On Mar 11, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Hard to go wrong with veggie fried rice. :D Depends on the veggies. :) Strewth. My point was more that most veggies didn't start out life with tentacles and blastocysts. (I'm not too much of a squeamish goon; I'll try most things once. Tentacle

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-11 Thread Julia Thompson
Warren Ockrassa wrote: On Mar 11, 2005, at 10:01 PM, Julia Thompson wrote: Hard to go wrong with veggie fried rice. :D Depends on the veggies. :) Strewth. My point was more that most veggies didn't start out life with tentacles and blastocysts. (I'm not too much of a squeamish goon; I'll try m

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-13 Thread Jim Sharkey
Gary Denton wrote: >(What would we do without search engines?) I don't know about you, but I'd probably sleep a lot better at night. :) I mean, the amount "Diznee" porn alone is staggering. Jim Some scary stuff out there Maru ___ Join Excite! - http

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-13 Thread Jim Sharkey
Warren Ockrassa wrote: >When East meets West, gustatory shocks cannot be too far behind. The same is true of when South meets North. When I was in college, my fraternity was about 30% Latino. I worked at a restaurant that had a Sunday buffet, and I would scavenge for food at the end of it. One

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-13 Thread Jim Sharkey
I wrote: >Some peopel just can't handle their brown gravy Maru Clearly, some "people" can't handle spelling either. D'oh! Jim ___ Join Excite! - http://www.excite.com The most personalized portal on the Web! __

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:33 AM Sunday 3/13/2005, Jim Sharkey wrote: One fine day, I appropriated a large amount of Swedish Meatballs. Rich, from Ecuador, decided to try a plateful. It...didn't work out well for him. Sort of a Montezuma's Revenge in reverse. :) The "sucks" instead of the "runs"? Vacuum Cleaner Ana

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-13 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:45 AM Sunday 3/13/2005, Jim Sharkey wrote: I wrote: >Some peopel just can't handle their brown gravy Maru Clearly, some "people" can't handle spelling either. D'oh! Oh, you're just having a rough spell today . . . --Ronn! :) ___ http://www.mccmedi

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-13 Thread Jim Sharkey
Ronn!Blankenship wrote: >Jim Sharkey wrote: >>Clearly, some "people" can't handle spelling either. D'oh!>Oh, you're just >>having a rough spell today . . . You know, if puns could kill, one would have to have a license to post on Brin-L. Jim ___ Jo

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-15 Thread Mauro Diotallevi
On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:38:18 -0600, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, fish & seafood are on the allergen list for me, so I don't touch > any of them anyway. So no "Trout Ice Cream with Eyeball" for you? If you don't get it, then apparently you don't watch enough Iron Chef or Ir

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-15 Thread Mauro Diotallevi
On Sun, 13 Mar 2005 23:07:27 -0500 (EST), Jim Sharkey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Ronn!Blankenship wrote: > >Jim Sharkey wrote: > >>Clearly, some "people" can't handle spelling either. D'oh!>Oh, you're just > >>having a rough spell today . . . > > You know, if puns could kill, one would have

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-16 Thread Ronn!Blankenship
At 07:10 PM Tuesday 3/15/2005, Mauro Diotallevi wrote: On Sat, 12 Mar 2005 00:38:18 -0600, Julia Thompson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, fish & seafood are on the allergen list for me, so I don't touch > any of them anyway. So no "Trout Ice Cream with Eyeball" for you? If you don't get it, then

Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay

2005-03-20 Thread Travis Edmunds
From: David Hobby <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: Killer Bs Discussion To: Killer Bs Discussion Subject: Re: [Satire] Flintstones Are Way Too Gay Date: Fri, 11 Mar 2005 22:06:03 -0500 A search for Flintstone's porn reveala little in gay themes but quite a lot of other. (What would we