Max Battcher wrote:
>Jim Sharkey wrote:
>Pratchett also relies on his fans to keep all his continuity ducks
>in a row, and he still can't always manage it either. :)
>I personally love how he managed to blame it on his own characters
>in Thief of Time. How can he be expected to keep continuity
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2006 2:09 PM
Subject: Re: The Gospel Of Judas
>> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >From: "
- Original Message -
From: "Max Battcher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 11:31 PM
Subject: Re: The Gospel Of Judas
> Robert Seeberger wrote:
>> In terms of morality and ethics *why* one chooses can be
> Robert Seeberger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >> "Robert G. Seeberger" wrote:
> >> Was Judas a villain?
> >> I don't think so myself. If one believes that
> >> Christ was divine and
> >> that God has a plan then Judas was just a part of
> >> the pla
Jim Sharkey wrote:
William T Goodall wrote:
Two millennia of fanwankery hasn't managed to patch up those plot
holes. Elephants on the back of a giant turtle makes more sense.
True, and it's a lot funnier. Although Pratchett also relies on his
fans to keep all his continuity ducks in a row, a
William T Goodall wrote:
>Two millennia of fanwankery hasn't managed to patch up those plot
>holes. Elephants on the back of a giant turtle makes more sense.
True, and it's a lot funnier. Although Pratchett also relies on his
fans to keep all his continuity ducks in a row, and he still can't
Robert Seeberger wrote:
In terms of morality and ethics *why* one chooses can be more
important than *what* one chooses.
Yuck! I know you state "can be" and not the absolute "are", but you
still are positing that "in some cases" "the ends justify the means" and
worse "the intent justify the
- Original Message -
From: "Deborah Harrell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Killer Bs Discussion"
Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2006 4:53 PM
Subject: Re: The Gospel Of Judas
>> "Robert G. Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>
>
On 19 Apr 2006, at 12:56AM, Max Battcher wrote:
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 19/04/2006, at 12:53 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
But I have
problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this makes
Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded schemer.
Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
anot
Charlie Bell wrote:
On 19/04/2006, at 12:53 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
But I have
problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this makes
Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded schemer.
Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
another planned betrayal.
Precisely. It's yet more o
On 19/04/2006, at 12:53 AM, Deborah Harrell wrote:
But I have
problems with the 'planned betrayal,' as this makes
Judas a stool pigeon, and God an underhanded schemer.
Indeed, it brings to mind the entire Garden bit as
another planned betrayal.
Precisely. It's yet more of why this "loving go
> "Robert G. Seeberger" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Was Judas a villain?
>
> I don't think so myself. If one believes that Christ
> was divine and
> that God has a plan then Judas was just a part of
> the plan and cannot
> be faulted for advancing the sacrifice. Indeed,
> advancing the
> sac
This has been on my mind a bit lately. I read the news reports over
the last couple of years and saw the NGEO documentary a couple of
times over the last few weeks.
Today I took a foray over to Pat Mathews blog and read what Pat thinks
(http://idiotgrrl.livejournal.com/). I don't #strongly# dis
13 matches
Mail list logo
