It doesn't get my vote.
...
way. Surely a team that finishes top 32 at tour 1 and then takes the rest
of the year off isn't really worth a place at nationals?
Probably true - but one could offer places at nationals based on total tour
points (i.e. you have to earn it), and then do seeding of
> One solution could be to decide the seeding based on AVERAGE points per
> tour, rather than total?
Get's my vote.
Dean.
It doesn't get my vote.
I think teams should be encouraged to attend all tours where possible,
though obviously circumstances sometimes dictate that it can't be done.
I
